Dorsally displaced distal radius fractures: introduction of Pacetti's line as radiological measurement to predict dorsal fracture displacement.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2021
01 07 2021
Historique:
received:
24
02
2021
accepted:
29
03
2021
entrez:
2
7
2021
pubmed:
3
7
2021
medline:
13
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the best of our knowledge there is not yet in the literature a measurement able to assess post reduction stability of distal radius fractures. to study the relationship between our newly introduced Pacetti's line, anatomical reduction of DRFs and post-reduction stability of fractures. Patients/Participants: 230 patients (122men, 108women) who sustained a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture. Close reduction procedures attempted; below elbow cast applied. Pacetti's line used on true AP and lateral view xrays after reduction and casting (T0) and at 7-14 days (T1-T2). Assessment and prediction of early displacement of DRFs. The Pacetti's line intersected the lunate bone in 162 cases (70.4%) after anatomical reduction, of which 20.4% (N=33) lost anatomical reduction. Cramer's V test: significant relationship between transition of Pacetti's line through the semilunar bone and stability of anatomical reduction at T0 follow-up (p<0.001, Cramer's value=0.83). The Pacetti's line intersected the lunate bone in 119 cases (51.7%) at 7-14 days follow-up. None of patients lost anatomical reduction. Cramer's V test: significant relationship between transition of Pacetti's line through the semilunar bone and stability anatomical reduction at T1 and T2 follow-up (p<0.001, Cramer's value=0.73). We strongly recommend the use of the Pacetti's line as it seems to provide reliable prediction of further fracture displacement and consequently of definitive management. The Pacetti's line seems to represent a very useful tool providing simple, feasible, efficient and reliable information on DRFs characteristics and natural course.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK
In the best of our knowledge there is not yet in the literature a measurement able to assess post reduction stability of distal radius fractures.
AIM
to study the relationship between our newly introduced Pacetti's line, anatomical reduction of DRFs and post-reduction stability of fractures.
METHODS
Patients/Participants: 230 patients (122men, 108women) who sustained a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture. Close reduction procedures attempted; below elbow cast applied.
FOLLOW-UP
Pacetti's line used on true AP and lateral view xrays after reduction and casting (T0) and at 7-14 days (T1-T2).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS
Assessment and prediction of early displacement of DRFs.
RESULTS
The Pacetti's line intersected the lunate bone in 162 cases (70.4%) after anatomical reduction, of which 20.4% (N=33) lost anatomical reduction. Cramer's V test: significant relationship between transition of Pacetti's line through the semilunar bone and stability of anatomical reduction at T0 follow-up (p<0.001, Cramer's value=0.83). The Pacetti's line intersected the lunate bone in 119 cases (51.7%) at 7-14 days follow-up. None of patients lost anatomical reduction. Cramer's V test: significant relationship between transition of Pacetti's line through the semilunar bone and stability anatomical reduction at T1 and T2 follow-up (p<0.001, Cramer's value=0.73).
CONCLUSIONS
We strongly recommend the use of the Pacetti's line as it seems to provide reliable prediction of further fracture displacement and consequently of definitive management. The Pacetti's line seems to represent a very useful tool providing simple, feasible, efficient and reliable information on DRFs characteristics and natural course.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34212906
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i3.11392
pmc: PMC8343761
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2021200Références
J Family Med Prim Care. 2014 Oct-Dec;3(4):325-32
pubmed: 25657938
Bone Joint J. 2016 Aug;98-B(8):1069-73
pubmed: 27482019
Hand (N Y). 2014 Dec;9(4):488-93
pubmed: 25414610
Radiology. 2001 Apr;219(1):11-28
pubmed: 11274530
Trials. 2018 Feb 02;19(1):84
pubmed: 29394904
BMC Med Imaging. 2016 Jul 22;16(1):44
pubmed: 27443373
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Mar;32(3):e97-e101
pubmed: 28906304
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):RC09-RC12
pubmed: 28274010
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):534-539
pubmed: 29388485
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Apr;105(1):69-74
pubmed: 32036564
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013 Feb 19;133(4):411-4
pubmed: 23423207
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Mar;95 Suppl 3:S75-80
pubmed: 22619891
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Mar;32(3):e92-e96
pubmed: 29315197
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Aug;43(8):710-719.e5
pubmed: 29908929
Postgrad Med J. 2018 May;94(1111):305-307
pubmed: 29540450
Med Arch. 2018 Oct;72(4):253-256
pubmed: 30514989
Chin J Traumatol. 2018 Apr;21(2):113-117
pubmed: 29395430
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 18;18(1):401
pubmed: 28923035
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Oct;400(7):767-79
pubmed: 26318178
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Jun;41(5):501-15
pubmed: 26420817