Minimum 2-Year Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Capsular Autograft Hip Labral Reconstruction.

acetabular labral repair acetabular labrum reconstruction capsular autograft labral reconstruction hip arthroscopy

Journal

The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 3 7 2021
medline: 10 8 2021
entrez: 2 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is a paucity of literature on arthroscopic capsular autograft labral reconstruction. To report midterm functional outcomes for patients undergoing acetabular labral repair with capsular autograft labral reconstruction. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. This is a retrospective case series of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent arthroscopic acetabular labral repair by the senior surgeon between March 2013 and August 2018. The inclusion criteria for this study were adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for arthroscopic capsular autograft labral reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were <2 years of postoperative follow-up, elective disenrollment from study before 2-year follow-up, or repeat ipsilateral hip surgery before 2-year follow-up. Intraoperatively, patients underwent capsular autograft hip labral reconstruction if they were found to have a labrum with hypoplastic tissue (width <5 mm), complex tearing, or frank degeneration of native tissue. Clinical outcome data consisted of patient-reported outcome measures. A total of 97 hips (94 patients) met the inclusion criteria with a mean final follow-up of 28.2 months (95% CI, 26.0-30.4). Patients had a mean age of 39.0 years (95% CI, 36.8-41.2) with a mean body mass index of 25.8 (95% CI, 24.9-26.7). When compared with baseline (40.4 [95% CI, 36.7-44.2]), the mean international Hip-Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores were significantly greater at 3-month (60.9 [95% CI, 56.8-64.9]; In this study of 97 hips undergoing arthroscopic labral repair with capsular autograft labral reconstruction, we found favorable outcomes that exceeded the MCID thresholds in the majority of patients at a mean 28.2 months' follow-up. Future studies should compare outcomes between this technique and other methods of autograft and allograft reconstruction to determine differences in patient-reported outcomes, donor-site morbidity, and complications.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is a paucity of literature on arthroscopic capsular autograft labral reconstruction.
PURPOSE
To report midterm functional outcomes for patients undergoing acetabular labral repair with capsular autograft labral reconstruction.
STUDY DESIGN
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
This is a retrospective case series of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent arthroscopic acetabular labral repair by the senior surgeon between March 2013 and August 2018. The inclusion criteria for this study were adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for arthroscopic capsular autograft labral reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were <2 years of postoperative follow-up, elective disenrollment from study before 2-year follow-up, or repeat ipsilateral hip surgery before 2-year follow-up. Intraoperatively, patients underwent capsular autograft hip labral reconstruction if they were found to have a labrum with hypoplastic tissue (width <5 mm), complex tearing, or frank degeneration of native tissue. Clinical outcome data consisted of patient-reported outcome measures.
RESULTS
A total of 97 hips (94 patients) met the inclusion criteria with a mean final follow-up of 28.2 months (95% CI, 26.0-30.4). Patients had a mean age of 39.0 years (95% CI, 36.8-41.2) with a mean body mass index of 25.8 (95% CI, 24.9-26.7). When compared with baseline (40.4 [95% CI, 36.7-44.2]), the mean international Hip-Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores were significantly greater at 3-month (60.9 [95% CI, 56.8-64.9];
CONCLUSIONS
In this study of 97 hips undergoing arthroscopic labral repair with capsular autograft labral reconstruction, we found favorable outcomes that exceeded the MCID thresholds in the majority of patients at a mean 28.2 months' follow-up. Future studies should compare outcomes between this technique and other methods of autograft and allograft reconstruction to determine differences in patient-reported outcomes, donor-site morbidity, and complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34213975
doi: 10.1177/03635465211026666
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2659-2667

Auteurs

Michael P Kucharik (MP)

Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Paul F Abraham (PF)

Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Mark R Nazal (MR)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Nathan H Varady (NH)

Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Wendy M Meek (WM)

Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Scott D Martin (SD)

Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH