Modelling the links between farm characteristics, respiratory health and pig production traits.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 07 2021
02 07 2021
Historique:
received:
30
07
2020
accepted:
08
06
2021
entrez:
3
7
2021
pubmed:
4
7
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sustainable livestock production requires links between farm characteristics, animal performance and animal health to be recognised and understood. In the pig industry, respiratory disease is prevalent, and has negative health, welfare and economic consequences. We used national-level carcass inspection data from the Food Standards Agency to identify associations between pig respiratory disease, farm characteristics (housing type and number of source farms), and pig performance (mortality, average daily weight gain, back fat and carcass weight) from 49 all in/all out grow-to-finish farms. We took a confirmatory approach by pre-registering our hypotheses and used Bayesian multi-level modelling to quantify the uncertainty in our estimates. The study findings showed that acquiring growing pigs from multiple sources was associated with higher respiratory condition prevalence. Higher prevalence of respiratory conditions was linked with higher mortality, and lower average daily weight gain, back fat and pig carcass weight. Our results support previous literature using a range of data sources. In conclusion, we find that meat inspection data are more valuable at a finer resolution than has been previously indicated and could be a useful tool in monitoring batch-level pig health in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34215759
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93027-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-93027-9
pmc: PMC8253804
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13789Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/N020790/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
PLoS One. 2015 May 28;10(5):e0128137
pubmed: 26020635
Vet J. 2012 Jul;193(1):234-9
pubmed: 22182431
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Mar 06;5:41
pubmed: 29560358
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Oct 1;146:34-43
pubmed: 28992926
BMC Vet Res. 2011 Dec 30;7:82
pubmed: 22208847
Vet J. 2010 Jun;184(3):326-33
pubmed: 19527939
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1999 Jun;46(5):341-52
pubmed: 10416368
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66
pubmed: 22006061
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8
pubmed: 20110467
J Agric Saf Health. 2000 Nov;6(4):261-74
pubmed: 11217691
Meat Sci. 2015 Oct;108:106-8
pubmed: 26072730
Vet J. 2011 Mar;187(3):388-92
pubmed: 20122861
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Apr;65(2):381-398
pubmed: 29124908
Vet Rec. 2019 Mar 16;184(11):349
pubmed: 30635452
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e29655
pubmed: 22363407
N Z Vet J. 1995 Aug;43(4):146-8
pubmed: 16031835
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161990
pubmed: 27564417
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Apr 1;104(1-2):65-73
pubmed: 22154250
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Aug 31;8:151
pubmed: 22937883
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 9;13(3):e0194013
pubmed: 29522574
Ir Vet J. 2012 Jun 27;65(1):11
pubmed: 22738170
Prev Vet Med. 2002 Aug 30;54(4):337-49
pubmed: 12163250
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8
pubmed: 26168122
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525
pubmed: 30305731
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Jun 25;10:140
pubmed: 24965915
Animal. 2014 Aug;8(8):1312-8
pubmed: 24229728
Prev Vet Med. 2012 May 1;104(3-4):271-80
pubmed: 22196500
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Feb 23;2(1):50-61
pubmed: 32289106
N Z Vet J. 1998 Feb;46(1):3-10
pubmed: 16032003
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 09;7:556674
pubmed: 33240946
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 1;159:106-114
pubmed: 30314772