Conducting density-sampled case-control studies using survey data with complex sampling designs: A simulation study.
Case-control studies
complex survey sampling
density sampling
risk-set sampling
simulation
Journal
Annals of epidemiology
ISSN: 1873-2585
Titre abrégé: Ann Epidemiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9100013
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
04
02
2021
revised:
29
05
2021
accepted:
24
06
2021
pubmed:
4
7
2021
medline:
22
3
2022
entrez:
3
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Population-based surveys are possible sources from which to draw representative control data for case-control studies. However, these surveys involve complex sampling that could lead to biased estimates of measures of association if not properly accounted for in analyses. Approaches to incorporating complex-sampled controls in density-sampled case-control designs have not been examined. We used a simulation study to evaluate the performance of different approaches to estimating incidence density ratios (IDR) from case-control studies with controls drawn from complex survey data using risk-set sampling. In simulated population data, we applied four survey sampling approaches, with varying survey sizes, and assessed the performance of four analysis methods for incorporating survey-based controls. Estimates of the IDR were unbiased for methods that conducted risk-set sampling with probability of selection proportional to survey weights. Estimates of the IDR were biased when sampling weights were not incorporated, or only included in regression modeling. The unbiased analysis methods performed comparably and produced estimates with variance comparable to biased methods. Variance increased and confidence interval coverage decreased as survey size decreased. Unbiased estimates are obtainable in risk-set sampled case-control studies using controls drawn from complex survey data when weights are properly incorporated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34216780
pii: S1047-2797(21)00204-0
doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.06.019
pmc: PMC8962511
mid: NIHMS1773247
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109-115Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : DP2 HD080350
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL129982
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 May 1;135(9):1042-50
pubmed: 1595690
Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29(1):67-75
pubmed: 29068838
Stat Med. 2007 Apr 15;26(8):1675-87
pubmed: 17278183
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 May 1;135(9):1019-28
pubmed: 1595688
Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Feb;103(2):226-35
pubmed: 1251836
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Sep;116(3):547-53
pubmed: 7124721
Epidemiology. 1994 May;5(3):356-9
pubmed: 8038254
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 28;189(2):81-90
pubmed: 31165875
Epidemiology. 2018 Sep;29(5):697-706
pubmed: 29889134
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 May 1;135(9):1029-41
pubmed: 1595689
Stat Methods Med Res. 1996 Sep;5(3):239-61
pubmed: 8931195
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 30;32(2):347-60
pubmed: 22833421
Biometrics. 1946 Jun;2(3):47-53
pubmed: 21001024
Biometrics. 2000 Mar;56(1):190-8
pubmed: 10783795
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jun;41(6):771-82
pubmed: 12764330
Biometrics. 1989 Dec;45(4):1053-71
pubmed: 2611317
J Chronic Dis. 1983;36(10):685-97
pubmed: 6630405
Biometrics. 1984 Mar;40(1):63-75
pubmed: 6375751
JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1351-2
pubmed: 23549579
Biostatistics. 2001 Mar;2(1):63-84
pubmed: 12933557