Physician associate/assistant contributions to cancer diagnosis in primary care: a rapid systematic review.
Early Detection of Cancer
General Practice
Physician assistants
Primary Care
primary care physicians
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jul 2021
03 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
06
01
2021
accepted:
16
06
2021
entrez:
4
7
2021
pubmed:
5
7
2021
medline:
7
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Symptom recognition and timely referral in primary care are crucial for the early diagnosis of cancer. Physician assistants or associates (PAs) have been introduced in 18 healthcare systems across the world, with numbers increasing in some cases to address primary care physician shortages. Little is known about their impact on suspected cancer recognition and referral. This review sought to summarise findings from observational studies conducted in high income countries on PAs' competence and performance on processes concerned with the quality of recognition and referral of suspected cancer in primary care. A rapid systematic review of international peer-reviewed literature was performed. Searches were undertaken on OVID, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases (2009-2019). Studies were eligible if they reported on PA skills, processes and outcomes relevant to suspected cancer recognition and referral. Title and abstract screening was followed by full paper review and data extraction. Synthesis of qualitative and quantitative findings was undertaken on three themes: deployment, competence, and performance. Preliminary findings were discussed with an expert advisory group to inform interpretation. From 883 references, 15 eligible papers were identified, of which 13 were from the USA. Seven studies reported on general clinical processes in primary care that would support cancer diagnosis, most commonly ordering of diagnostic tests (n = 6) and referrals to specialists (n = 4). Fewer papers reported on consultation processes, such as examinations or history taking (n = 3) Six papers considered PAs' competence and performance on cancer screening. PAs performed similarly to primary care physicians on rates of diagnostic tests ordered, referrals and patient outcomes (satisfaction, malpractice, emergency visits). No studies reported on the timeliness of cancer diagnosis. This review of peer-reviewed literature combined with advisory group interpretation suggests the introduction of PAs into primary care may maintain the quality of referrals and diagnostic tests needed to support cancer diagnosis. It also highlights the lack of research on several aspects of PAs' roles, including outcomes of the diagnostic process.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Symptom recognition and timely referral in primary care are crucial for the early diagnosis of cancer. Physician assistants or associates (PAs) have been introduced in 18 healthcare systems across the world, with numbers increasing in some cases to address primary care physician shortages. Little is known about their impact on suspected cancer recognition and referral. This review sought to summarise findings from observational studies conducted in high income countries on PAs' competence and performance on processes concerned with the quality of recognition and referral of suspected cancer in primary care.
METHOD
METHODS
A rapid systematic review of international peer-reviewed literature was performed. Searches were undertaken on OVID, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases (2009-2019). Studies were eligible if they reported on PA skills, processes and outcomes relevant to suspected cancer recognition and referral. Title and abstract screening was followed by full paper review and data extraction. Synthesis of qualitative and quantitative findings was undertaken on three themes: deployment, competence, and performance. Preliminary findings were discussed with an expert advisory group to inform interpretation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From 883 references, 15 eligible papers were identified, of which 13 were from the USA. Seven studies reported on general clinical processes in primary care that would support cancer diagnosis, most commonly ordering of diagnostic tests (n = 6) and referrals to specialists (n = 4). Fewer papers reported on consultation processes, such as examinations or history taking (n = 3) Six papers considered PAs' competence and performance on cancer screening. PAs performed similarly to primary care physicians on rates of diagnostic tests ordered, referrals and patient outcomes (satisfaction, malpractice, emergency visits). No studies reported on the timeliness of cancer diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This review of peer-reviewed literature combined with advisory group interpretation suggests the introduction of PAs into primary care may maintain the quality of referrals and diagnostic tests needed to support cancer diagnosis. It also highlights the lack of research on several aspects of PAs' roles, including outcomes of the diagnostic process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34217265
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06667-y
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06667-y
pmc: PMC8254243
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
644Références
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e489-e498
pubmed: 31160367
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):1011-1019
pubmed: 28429886
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 18;13:223
pubmed: 23773235
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):256-88
pubmed: 21676023
Med Care. 2017 Jan;55(1):12-18
pubmed: 27367866
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jan;29(1):91-99
pubmed: 31314684
Anthropol Med. 2019 Aug;26(2):213-227
pubmed: 28758798
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 16;165(4):290-1
pubmed: 27322738
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;41:149-164
pubmed: 31358248
Med Care. 2017 Jun;55(6):615-622
pubmed: 28234756
Health Commun. 2009 Jun;24(4):304-15
pubmed: 19499424
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:239-45
pubmed: 25625230
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jun;32(6):1135-42
pubmed: 23733989
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 May;29(5):686-692
pubmed: 31433260
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Oct;142:187-199
pubmed: 31445441
J Physician Assist Educ. 2014;25(1):4-11
pubmed: 24765804
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):101-7
pubmed: 25419763
BMC Cancer. 2014 Mar 31;14:233
pubmed: 24685149
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 16;13:224
pubmed: 26377409
Lancet. 2019 Jul 27;394(10195):273
pubmed: 31354125
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):365
pubmed: 32349738
JAAPA. 2017 Apr;30(4):1-8
pubmed: 28350738
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Mar;25(3):255-62
pubmed: 26540622
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Oct;74(5):613-624
pubmed: 27457425
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2019 Jan 2;80(1):12-17
pubmed: 30592669
JAAPA. 2020 Dec;33(12):43-45
pubmed: 33234895
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0160902
pubmed: 27560179
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 May 1;176(5):654-61
pubmed: 27042937
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 16;165(4):237-44
pubmed: 27322541
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2020 Mar/Apr;43(2):156-163
pubmed: 32251217
Br J Cancer. 2014 Oct 14;111(8):1490-9
pubmed: 25072256
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jan;68(666):e63-e72
pubmed: 29255111
Am J Med. 2019 Nov;132(11):e778-e785
pubmed: 31145882
BMJ. 2002 Aug 31;325(7362):485-7
pubmed: 12202333
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):e344-50
pubmed: 25918339