Key elements in selection of pre-dialysis patients for home dialysis.

Home dialysis modality selection pre-dialysis programme social worker treatment modality education

Journal

Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
ISSN: 1718-4304
Titre abrégé: Perit Dial Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904033

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 6 7 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
entrez: 5 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Most pre-dialysis patients are medically eligible for home dialysis, and home dialysis has several advantages over incentre dialysis. However, accurately selecting patients for home dialysis appears to be difficult, since uptake of home dialysis remains low. The aim of this study was to investigate which medical or psychosocial elements contribute most to the selection of patients eligible for home dialysis. All patients from a Dutch teaching hospital, who received treatment modality education and subsequently started dialysis treatment, were included. The pre-dialysis programme consisted of questionnaires for the patient, nephrologist and social worker, followed by an assessment of eligibility for home dialysis by a multidisciplinary team. Clinimetric assessment and logistic regression were used to identify domains and questions associated with home dialysis treatment. A total of 135 patients were included, of whom 40 were treated with home dialysis and 95 with incentre haemodialysis. The key elements associated with long-term home dialysis treatment were part of the domains 'suitability of the housing', 'self-care', 'social support' and 'patient capacity', with adjusted odds ratios ranging from 0.13 for negative to 18.3 for positive associations. The assessment of contraindications by a nephrologist followed by the assessment of possibilities by a social worker or dialysis nurse who investigates four key elements, ideally during a home visit, and subsequent detailed education offered by specialized nurses is an optimal way to select patients for home dialysis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Most pre-dialysis patients are medically eligible for home dialysis, and home dialysis has several advantages over incentre dialysis. However, accurately selecting patients for home dialysis appears to be difficult, since uptake of home dialysis remains low. The aim of this study was to investigate which medical or psychosocial elements contribute most to the selection of patients eligible for home dialysis.
METHODS METHODS
All patients from a Dutch teaching hospital, who received treatment modality education and subsequently started dialysis treatment, were included. The pre-dialysis programme consisted of questionnaires for the patient, nephrologist and social worker, followed by an assessment of eligibility for home dialysis by a multidisciplinary team. Clinimetric assessment and logistic regression were used to identify domains and questions associated with home dialysis treatment.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 135 patients were included, of whom 40 were treated with home dialysis and 95 with incentre haemodialysis. The key elements associated with long-term home dialysis treatment were part of the domains 'suitability of the housing', 'self-care', 'social support' and 'patient capacity', with adjusted odds ratios ranging from 0.13 for negative to 18.3 for positive associations.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The assessment of contraindications by a nephrologist followed by the assessment of possibilities by a social worker or dialysis nurse who investigates four key elements, ideally during a home visit, and subsequent detailed education offered by specialized nurses is an optimal way to select patients for home dialysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34219552
doi: 10.1177/08968608211023263
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

494-501

Auteurs

Anna A Bonenkamp (AA)

Department of Nephrology, 522567Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Research Institute Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, The Netherlands.

Tom D Y Reijnders (TDY)

Department of Internal Medicine, 1170Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

Anita van Eck van der Sluijs (A)

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, 8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.

E Christiaan Hagen (EC)

Department of Internal Medicine, 1170Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Medworq B.V., Medworq, Zeist, The Netherlands.

Alferso C Abrahams (AC)

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, 8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Frans J van Ittersum (FJ)

Department of Nephrology, 522567Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Research Institute Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, The Netherlands.

Brigit C van Jaarsveld (BC)

Department of Nephrology, 522567Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Research Institute Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH