SABCS 2020: update on triple-negative and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.
Conference report
Highlights
Metastatic HER-positive breast cancer
Review
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2020
Triple-negative breast cancer
Journal
Memo
ISSN: 1865-5041
Titre abrégé: Memo
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 101467972
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
17
04
2021
accepted:
26
05
2021
pubmed:
6
7
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
5
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One year into the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) was another large congress held in a virtual format. Despite these circumstances, clinically relevant data were presented, and this short review focuses on developments in the fields of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. A quality-of-life (QoL) analysis from IMPassion031 showed that adding atezolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a detrimental effect on QoL, while the burden of treatment-induced side effects increased with each cycle of neoadjuvant therapy in both treatment arms. KEYNOTE-355 evaluated the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment in metastatic TNBC (mTNBC); a significant improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) was reported in the pembrolizumab arm. At the 2020 SABCS, results with respect to different chemotherapy backbones were reported and the benefit of pembrolizumab was maintained irrespective of the type of taxane. Disappointingly, the phase III IPATunity130 study could not confirm a PFS improvement with the AKT inhibitor ipatasertib when added to paclitaxel as first-line treatment in mTNBC. A biomarker analysis from the phase III ASCENT study showed that the antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan was superior to chemotherapy by investigator's choice independent of Trop‑2 expression and
Identifiants
pubmed: 34221179
doi: 10.1007/s12254-021-00722-4
pii: 722
pmc: PMC8240615
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
247-251Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestR. Bartsch: Advisory Role: Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Puma, Roche, Seagen; Lecture Honoraria: Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Seagen; Research Support: Daiichi, MSD, Novartis, Roche.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):610-621
pubmed: 31825192
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2108-2121
pubmed: 30345906
Ann Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1148-1156
pubmed: 34116144
Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1817-1828
pubmed: 33278935
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;36(28):2826-2835
pubmed: 30106636
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1090-1100
pubmed: 32966830
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 10;38(23):2610-2619
pubmed: 32468955
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;48(9):855-859
pubmed: 30020510
Ann Oncol. 2021 Aug;32(8):994-1004
pubmed: 34219000
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):597-609
pubmed: 31825569
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1360-1372
pubmed: 28800861