Imaging striae distensae: a comparison between PS-OCT and digital dermoscopy.
Journal
Biomedical optics express
ISSN: 2156-7085
Titre abrégé: Biomed Opt Express
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101540630
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2021
01 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
18
12
2020
revised:
26
03
2021
accepted:
02
04
2021
entrez:
5
7
2021
pubmed:
6
7
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stretch marks or striae distensae (SD) cause emotional distress and negatively affect the psychological well-being of patients. We investigate and compare two methods for quantifying the severity of SD: visual scoring of images captured using a clinical visible-light dermatological camera (C-Cube, Pixience Inc) and measuring the local birefringence of skin using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT). Data on skin visually affected by SD and visually normal skin were collected from 19 human volunteers. Our results show a weak correlation between visual scores of the C-Cube images and the birefringence values obtained from the PS-OCT system. SD datasets have a significantly larger birefringence values compared to visually normal datasets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34221661
doi: 10.1364/BOE.417084
pii: 417084
pmc: PMC8221947
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3296-3311Informations de copyright
Published by The Optical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Stephen J. Matcher, Simon G. Danby and Michael J. Cork disclose that they are in receipt of funding from Pfizer Inc., LEO Pharma A/S and Sanofi S.A.
Références
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Oct;20(9):1108-13
pubmed: 16987267
Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:673706
pubmed: 22203840
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Feb 18;5(3):752-62
pubmed: 24688811
Opt Express. 2001 Dec 17;9(13):780-90
pubmed: 19424315
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Aug 21;5:450
pubmed: 22905939
Dermatol Surg. 2014 May;40(5):537-44
pubmed: 24612027
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994 Jul;19(4):285-8
pubmed: 7955466
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Feb;30(2):211-22
pubmed: 26486318
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 Dec;15(4):393-398
pubmed: 27090205
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Dec;22(12):1-8
pubmed: 29264892
J Biomed Opt. 2014 Dec;19(12):126014
pubmed: 25539060
Br J Dermatol. 1985 Feb;112(2):185-93
pubmed: 3970840
Int J Dermatol. 2010 Jan;49(1):30-2
pubmed: 20465607
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Dec;22(12):1-17
pubmed: 29264891
Biomed Opt Express. 2019 Jul 24;10(8):4179-4189
pubmed: 31453003
Adv Ther. 2001 Jul-Aug;18(4):181-6
pubmed: 11697021
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1979;59(85):161-9
pubmed: 294092
Opt Express. 2008 Oct 13;16(21):16410-22
pubmed: 18852747
J Biomed Opt. 2013 Jun;18(6):066005
pubmed: 23733021
Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1178-81
pubmed: 1957169
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011 Nov;30(6):431-51
pubmed: 21729763
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016 Jun;17(3):239-56
pubmed: 26923916
Opt Express. 2007 Dec 24;15(26):18033-49
pubmed: 19551101
Opt Express. 2008 Aug 18;16(17):13032-41
pubmed: 18711542
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Sep;77(3):559-568.e18
pubmed: 28551068
Opt Lett. 1998 Feb 1;23(3):228-30
pubmed: 18084468
J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Sep;123(3):458-63
pubmed: 15304083
Skin Res Technol. 2019 May;25(3):283-288
pubmed: 30345576
Opt Express. 2010 Jan 18;18(2):854-76
pubmed: 20173907