Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016.

Contraception United States demography family planning

Journal

F&S reports
ISSN: 2666-3341
Titre abrégé: F S Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101766618

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 15 04 2020
revised: 23 06 2020
accepted: 26 06 2020
entrez: 5 7 2021
pubmed: 6 7 2021
medline: 6 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To examine current levels, correlates of, and changes in contraceptive use among reproductive-age women in the United States between 2014 and 2016. We conducted simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify associations between user characteristics and contraceptive use, with specific attention to methods requiring a visit to a health care provider. Not applicable. All self-identified female respondents to the surveys. Secondary analysis of two rounds of the National Survey of Family Growth, an in-home, nationally representative survey of people ages 15-44 years (2013-2015) and 15-49 years (2015-2017). None. Current use of a contraceptive method, including use of individual methods and grouped method use in 2016, and change in use from 2014. Contraceptive use remained steady between 2014 and 2016 among sexually active females not seeking pregnancy (88%). Among users, use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods increased from 14% to 18%, as use of short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods fell from 32% to 28%. Implant use among 15- to 19-year-olds rose from 6% to 16% and represents one of the largest increases observed. Access to sexual and reproductive health care was strongly associated with use of all LARC and SARC methods except for the implant (adjusted odds ratios ranged from 3.21 to 13.53). Contraceptive users are shifting primarily among the most and moderately effective method groups, and not from contraceptive nonuse to use. Reductions in access to sexual and reproductive health care could have implications for individuals' ability to use their preferred contraceptive methods.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34223223
doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.06.006
pii: S2666-3341(20)30038-6
pmc: PMC8244260
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

83-93

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author(s).

Références

Demography. 2011 Nov;48(4):1451-72
pubmed: 21887582
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Sep;48(3):119-27
pubmed: 27490460
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;239:112531
pubmed: 31513932
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e1244-56
pubmed: 25266430
Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):493-8
pubmed: 22018123
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81(3):349-54
pubmed: 20837389
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Sep;44(3):194-200
pubmed: 22958664
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):915-916
pubmed: 26444119
Contraception. 2020 Feb;101(2):79-85
pubmed: 31805265
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 28;(7):CD001777
pubmed: 25101364
Adv Data. 2004 Dec 10;(350):1-36
pubmed: 15633582
Natl Health Stat Report. 2013 Feb 14;(62):1-15
pubmed: 24988816
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):597.e1-597.e7
pubmed: 29577915
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1932-1937
pubmed: 27631741
Contracept X. 2019 Nov 15;2:100014
pubmed: 32550529
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):14-21
pubmed: 29038071
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):343-351
pubmed: 30661886
Contraception. 2017 Oct;96(4):221-226
pubmed: 28756187
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013 Apr;26(2):86-95
pubmed: 23287602
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):171-5
pubmed: 24861029
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Oct;47(4):374-80
pubmed: 20864007
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011 Apr;24(2):79-84
pubmed: 21126893
Contraception. 2008 Sep;78(3):197-200
pubmed: 18692608

Auteurs

Megan L Kavanaugh (ML)

Guttmacher Institute, Research Division, New York, New York.

Emma Pliskin (E)

Guttmacher Institute, Research Division, New York, New York.

Classifications MeSH