Use of briefing and debriefing in neonatal resuscitation, a scoping review.
Neonatal CPR
Neonatal advanced life support
Neonatal basic life support
Neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Neonatal resuscitation
Scoping review
Journal
Resuscitation plus
ISSN: 2666-5204
Titre abrégé: Resusc Plus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101774410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
09
09
2020
revised:
22
10
2020
accepted:
28
11
2020
entrez:
5
7
2021
pubmed:
6
7
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To review the literature on briefing and debriefing in neonatal resuscitation using International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) methodology to see if a formal systematic review is justified. This scoping review was undertaken by an ILCOR Newborn Life Support scoping review team and guided by the ILCOR methodological framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed, compared briefing/debriefing of healthcare professionals who had completed a neonatal resuscitation or simulated resuscitation and reported outcomes for infants, families or staff. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched. This review included four studies that reported on three briefing/debriefing interventions: video debriefing, the use of checklists with a briefing/debriefing component and rapid cycle deliberate practice. Video debriefing was associated with improvements in the process of care and adherence to resuscitation guidelines. Use of checklists was associated with improvements in short term clinical outcomes and a reduction in communication problems. Rapid cycle deliberate practice may lead to short but not sustained improvements in algorithm compliance and timely completion of resuscitation steps. This scoping review did not identify sufficient new evidence to justify conducting new systematic reviews or review of current resuscitation guidelines. Improvements in the process of care, short term clinical outcomes and reduction in communication problems were associated with briefing/debriefing supported by video, checklists or rapid, cycle deliberate practice. It highlights knowledge gaps, including the need to consider briefing/debriefing separately from other interventions, the effect of briefing/debriefing on short- and long-term clinical outcomes and the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice on resuscitation training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34223331
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100059
pii: S2666-5204(20)30060-6
pmc: PMC8244473
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
100059Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Références
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):e1739-44
pubmed: 17074839
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 21;6:37397
pubmed: 27869210
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Apr;10(2):192-197
pubmed: 29686759
J Perinatol. 2016 Jun;36(6):415-9
pubmed: 27031321
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Mar;62(3):394-403
pubmed: 29315458
Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84(11):1552-7
pubmed: 23810750
Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):212-21
pubmed: 16987590
Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S516-38
pubmed: 20956259