Characteristics and outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with the emphasis on workplaces: an observational study from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Location
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Public place
Register
Utstein style
Workplace
Journal
Resuscitation plus
ISSN: 2666-5204
Titre abrégé: Resusc Plus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101774410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
28
09
2020
revised:
17
12
2020
accepted:
25
01
2021
entrez:
5
7
2021
pubmed:
6
7
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Characteristics and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurring at workplaces is sparsely studied. To describe (1) the characteristics and 30-day survival of OHCAs occurring at workplaces in comparison to OHCAs at other places and (2) factors associated with survival after OHCAs at workplaces. Data on OHCAs were obtained from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Characteristics and factors associated with survival were analysed with emphasis on the location of OHCAs. Among 47,685 OHCAs, 529 cases (1%) occurred at workplaces. Overall, in the fully adjusted model, all locations of OHCA, with the exception of crowded public places, displayed significantly lower probability of survival than workplaces. Exhibiting a shockable rhythm was the strongest predictor of survival among patients with OHCAs at workplaces; odds ratio (95% CI) 5.80 (2.92-12.31). Odds ratio for survival for women was 2.08 (95% CI 1.07-4.03), compared with men. At workplaces other than private offices, odds ratio for survival was 0.41 (95% CI 0.16-0.95) for cases who did not receive bystander CPR, as compared to those who did receive CPR. Among patients who were found in a shockable rhythm were 23% defibrillated before arrival of ambulance, which was more frequent than in any other location. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring at workplaces and crowded public places display the highest probability of survival, as compared with other places outside hospital. An initial shockable cardiac rhythm was the strongest predictor of survival for OHCA at workplaces.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Characteristics and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurring at workplaces is sparsely studied.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To describe (1) the characteristics and 30-day survival of OHCAs occurring at workplaces in comparison to OHCAs at other places and (2) factors associated with survival after OHCAs at workplaces.
METHODS
METHODS
Data on OHCAs were obtained from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Characteristics and factors associated with survival were analysed with emphasis on the location of OHCAs.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 47,685 OHCAs, 529 cases (1%) occurred at workplaces. Overall, in the fully adjusted model, all locations of OHCA, with the exception of crowded public places, displayed significantly lower probability of survival than workplaces. Exhibiting a shockable rhythm was the strongest predictor of survival among patients with OHCAs at workplaces; odds ratio (95% CI) 5.80 (2.92-12.31). Odds ratio for survival for women was 2.08 (95% CI 1.07-4.03), compared with men. At workplaces other than private offices, odds ratio for survival was 0.41 (95% CI 0.16-0.95) for cases who did not receive bystander CPR, as compared to those who did receive CPR. Among patients who were found in a shockable rhythm were 23% defibrillated before arrival of ambulance, which was more frequent than in any other location.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring at workplaces and crowded public places display the highest probability of survival, as compared with other places outside hospital. An initial shockable cardiac rhythm was the strongest predictor of survival for OHCA at workplaces.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34223355
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100090
pii: S2666-5204(21)00015-1
pmc: PMC8244450
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100090Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Références
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:328-40
pubmed: 25438254
J Cardiol. 2020 Jan;75(1):97-104
pubmed: 31350130
Resuscitation. 2015 Jun;91:1-7
pubmed: 25771499
Resuscitation. 2010 Nov;81(11):1479-87
pubmed: 20828914
Resuscitation. 2018 Sep;130:73-80
pubmed: 30017862
Heart. 2018 Dec;104(23):1929-1936
pubmed: 29903805
N Engl J Med. 2000 Oct 26;343(17):1206-9
pubmed: 11071670
Circulation. 2015 Sep 29;132(13):1286-300
pubmed: 25391522
Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:218-226
pubmed: 32027980
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596
pubmed: 31992061
Resuscitation. 2013 Jul;84(7):952-6
pubmed: 23313425
J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Aug;58(8):747-52
pubmed: 27218279
Heart. 2011 Sep;97(17):1391-6
pubmed: 21715444
Resuscitation. 2020 Jul;152:39-49
pubmed: 32272235
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 19;28(1):103
pubmed: 33076942
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:288-301
pubmed: 26477418
Resuscitation. 2019 May;138:168-181
pubmed: 30898569
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 25;28(1):60
pubmed: 32586339
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 22;24(1):61
pubmed: 32087741
Circulation. 2004 Nov 23;110(21):3385-97
pubmed: 15557386
Resuscitation. 2006 May;69(2):221-8
pubmed: 16519986
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2316-25
pubmed: 26061836
Resuscitation. 2002 Jul;54(1):37-45
pubmed: 12104107
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:30-6
pubmed: 26215481
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 20;55(16):1713-20
pubmed: 20394876
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):994-1004
pubmed: 20237345
Resuscitation. 2009 May;80(5):602-3
pubmed: 19249148