FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective per real-world evidence synthesized across a multi-state health system.


Journal

Med (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 2666-6340
Titre abrégé: Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101769215

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 08 2021
Historique:
received: 05 03 2021
revised: 05 05 2021
accepted: 17 06 2021
pubmed: 6 7 2021
medline: 6 7 2021
entrez: 5 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), have demonstrated high efficacy in large phase 3 randomized clinical trials. It is important to assess their effectiveness in a real-world setting. This is a retrospective analysis of 136,532 individuals in the Mayo Clinic health system (Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) with PCR testing data between December 1, 2020 and April 20, 2021. We compared clinical outcomes for a vaccinated cohort of 68,266 individuals who received at least one dose of either vaccine (n The real-world vaccine effectiveness of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection was 86.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.4%-89.1%) for BNT162b2 and 93.3% (95% CI: 85.7%-97.4%) for mRNA-1273. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were 88.8% (95% CI: 75.5%-95.7%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 71.6%-93.9%) effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalization. Both vaccines were 100% effective (95% CI BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are effective in a real-world setting and are associated with reduced rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and decreased burden of COVID-19 on the healthcare system. This study was funded by nference.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), have demonstrated high efficacy in large phase 3 randomized clinical trials. It is important to assess their effectiveness in a real-world setting.
METHODS
This is a retrospective analysis of 136,532 individuals in the Mayo Clinic health system (Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) with PCR testing data between December 1, 2020 and April 20, 2021. We compared clinical outcomes for a vaccinated cohort of 68,266 individuals who received at least one dose of either vaccine (n
FINDINGS
The real-world vaccine effectiveness of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection was 86.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.4%-89.1%) for BNT162b2 and 93.3% (95% CI: 85.7%-97.4%) for mRNA-1273. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were 88.8% (95% CI: 75.5%-95.7%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 71.6%-93.9%) effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalization. Both vaccines were 100% effective (95% CI
CONCLUSIONS
BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are effective in a real-world setting and are associated with reduced rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and decreased burden of COVID-19 on the healthcare system.
FUNDING
This study was funded by nference.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34223401
doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.06.007
pii: S2666-6340(21)00238-5
pmc: PMC8238652
doi:

Substances chimiques

COVID-19 Vaccines 0
2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 EPK39PL4R4
BNT162 Vaccine N38TVC63NU

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

979-992.e8

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

C.P., P.L., A.P., V.A., A.V., M.J.M.N., and V.S. are employees of nference and have financial interests in the company and in the successful application of this research. J.C.O. receives personal fees from Elsevier and Bates College and small grants from nference, Inc., outside of the submitted work. A.D.B. is a consultant for Abbvie, is on scientific advisory boards for nference and Zentalis, and is founder and President of Splissen Therapeutics. J.H., J.C.O., M.D.S., A.V., and A.D.B. are employees of the Mayo Clinic. The Mayo Clinic may stand to gain financially from the successful outcome of the research. nference collaborates with Janssen and other bio-pharmaceutical companies on data science initiatives unrelated to this study. These collaborations had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.

Auteurs

Colin Pawlowski (C)

nference, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

Patrick Lenehan (P)

nference, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

Arjun Puranik (A)

nference, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

Vineet Agarwal (V)

nference, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

A J Venkatakrishnan (AJ)

nference, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

Michiel J M Niesen (MJM)

nference, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

John C O'Horo (JC)

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.

Abinash Virk (A)

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.

Melanie D Swift (MD)

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.

Andrew D Badley (AD)

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.

John Halamka (J)

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.

Venky Soundararajan (V)

nference, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH