Changes to summative skills-based assessments within the Big Ten Academic Alliance Performance-Based Assessment Collaborative (BTAA-PBAC) due to COVID-19.
COVID‐19
United States
clinical
competence
pharmacy
schools
students
Journal
Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP
ISSN: 2574-9870
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Clin Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101723133
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
18
12
2020
revised:
10
03
2021
accepted:
10
03
2021
pubmed:
7
7
2021
medline:
7
7
2021
entrez:
6
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In Spring 2020 many academic institutions transitioned to remote learning in response to the developing COVID-19 pandemic. These changes affected skills-based training, as schools of pharmacy were forced to transition traditionally in-person assessments to a remote setting. The purpose of this article is to describe the experience of pharmacy skills lab coordinators when transitioning summative skills-based assessments (SSBA). A web-based survey instrument administered through Qualtrics Nine of ten invited institutions responded to the survey. Of the nine respondents, three participated in the post-survey interview. Overall, 79.5% (93/117) of skills planned to be assessed were assessed with or without modification, with 8.5% (10/117) of skills canceled and 10.3% (12/117) of skills assessments postponed. The most common challenges mentioned were the lack of preparation time, inability to assess certain skills virtually, and student barriers. The most common recommendations made were to prioritize lab components and incorporate flexibility in planning and scheduling. The results indicate that most skills were still assessed during the Spring 2020 semester. Though the transition to remote learning was challenging and unique for each institution, common strategies and recommendations identified here provide opportunities for academics to analyze and prioritize learning objectives and to rethink how to develop and deliver SSBAs as remote assessments.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
In Spring 2020 many academic institutions transitioned to remote learning in response to the developing COVID-19 pandemic. These changes affected skills-based training, as schools of pharmacy were forced to transition traditionally in-person assessments to a remote setting. The purpose of this article is to describe the experience of pharmacy skills lab coordinators when transitioning summative skills-based assessments (SSBA).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A web-based survey instrument administered through Qualtrics
Results
UNASSIGNED
Nine of ten invited institutions responded to the survey. Of the nine respondents, three participated in the post-survey interview. Overall, 79.5% (93/117) of skills planned to be assessed were assessed with or without modification, with 8.5% (10/117) of skills canceled and 10.3% (12/117) of skills assessments postponed. The most common challenges mentioned were the lack of preparation time, inability to assess certain skills virtually, and student barriers. The most common recommendations made were to prioritize lab components and incorporate flexibility in planning and scheduling.
Discussion
UNASSIGNED
The results indicate that most skills were still assessed during the Spring 2020 semester. Though the transition to remote learning was challenging and unique for each institution, common strategies and recommendations identified here provide opportunities for academics to analyze and prioritize learning objectives and to rethink how to develop and deliver SSBAs as remote assessments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34226886
doi: 10.1002/jac5.1445
pii: JAC51445
pmc: PMC8242699
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
827-836Informations de copyright
© 2021 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):3399
pubmed: 26632083
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1595-1599
pubmed: 33119561
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Sep 15;78(7):137
pubmed: 25258442
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2021 Jul;4(7):827-836
pubmed: 34226886
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Aug;20(6):760-761
pubmed: 32505690
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):929-936
pubmed: 32004427
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Nov;84(11):7976
pubmed: 34283750
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jun;84(6):ajpe8157
pubmed: 32665728
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jun;84(6):ajpe8088
pubmed: 32665717
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jun;84(6):ajpe8131
pubmed: 32665718
Med Teach. 2002 Sep;24(5):483-7
pubmed: 12474813
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Feb;85(2):8072
pubmed: 34283736
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Aug 12;77(6):130
pubmed: 23966733
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Dec 27;15:10867
pubmed: 32051850
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Aug;84(8):ajpe8197
pubmed: 32934392