Changes to summative skills-based assessments within the Big Ten Academic Alliance Performance-Based Assessment Collaborative (BTAA-PBAC) due to COVID-19.

COVID‐19 United States clinical competence pharmacy schools students

Journal

Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP
ISSN: 2574-9870
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Clin Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101723133

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 18 12 2020
revised: 10 03 2021
accepted: 10 03 2021
pubmed: 7 7 2021
medline: 7 7 2021
entrez: 6 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In Spring 2020 many academic institutions transitioned to remote learning in response to the developing COVID-19 pandemic. These changes affected skills-based training, as schools of pharmacy were forced to transition traditionally in-person assessments to a remote setting. The purpose of this article is to describe the experience of pharmacy skills lab coordinators when transitioning summative skills-based assessments (SSBA). A web-based survey instrument administered through Qualtrics Nine of ten invited institutions responded to the survey. Of the nine respondents, three participated in the post-survey interview. Overall, 79.5% (93/117) of skills planned to be assessed were assessed with or without modification, with 8.5% (10/117) of skills canceled and 10.3% (12/117) of skills assessments postponed. The most common challenges mentioned were the lack of preparation time, inability to assess certain skills virtually, and student barriers. The most common recommendations made were to prioritize lab components and incorporate flexibility in planning and scheduling. The results indicate that most skills were still assessed during the Spring 2020 semester. Though the transition to remote learning was challenging and unique for each institution, common strategies and recommendations identified here provide opportunities for academics to analyze and prioritize learning objectives and to rethink how to develop and deliver SSBAs as remote assessments.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
In Spring 2020 many academic institutions transitioned to remote learning in response to the developing COVID-19 pandemic. These changes affected skills-based training, as schools of pharmacy were forced to transition traditionally in-person assessments to a remote setting. The purpose of this article is to describe the experience of pharmacy skills lab coordinators when transitioning summative skills-based assessments (SSBA).
Methods UNASSIGNED
A web-based survey instrument administered through Qualtrics
Results UNASSIGNED
Nine of ten invited institutions responded to the survey. Of the nine respondents, three participated in the post-survey interview. Overall, 79.5% (93/117) of skills planned to be assessed were assessed with or without modification, with 8.5% (10/117) of skills canceled and 10.3% (12/117) of skills assessments postponed. The most common challenges mentioned were the lack of preparation time, inability to assess certain skills virtually, and student barriers. The most common recommendations made were to prioritize lab components and incorporate flexibility in planning and scheduling.
Discussion UNASSIGNED
The results indicate that most skills were still assessed during the Spring 2020 semester. Though the transition to remote learning was challenging and unique for each institution, common strategies and recommendations identified here provide opportunities for academics to analyze and prioritize learning objectives and to rethink how to develop and deliver SSBAs as remote assessments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34226886
doi: 10.1002/jac5.1445
pii: JAC51445
pmc: PMC8242699
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

827-836

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Références

Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):3399
pubmed: 26632083
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1595-1599
pubmed: 33119561
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Sep 15;78(7):137
pubmed: 25258442
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2021 Jul;4(7):827-836
pubmed: 34226886
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Aug;20(6):760-761
pubmed: 32505690
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):929-936
pubmed: 32004427
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Nov;84(11):7976
pubmed: 34283750
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jun;84(6):ajpe8157
pubmed: 32665728
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jun;84(6):ajpe8088
pubmed: 32665717
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jun;84(6):ajpe8131
pubmed: 32665718
Med Teach. 2002 Sep;24(5):483-7
pubmed: 12474813
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Feb;85(2):8072
pubmed: 34283736
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Aug 12;77(6):130
pubmed: 23966733
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Dec 27;15:10867
pubmed: 32051850
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Aug;84(8):ajpe8197
pubmed: 32934392

Auteurs

Mary Nolan (M)

Purdue University College of Pharmacy West Lafayette Indiana USA.

Marina Maes (M)

University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy Madison Wisconsin USA.

Deanna Tran (D)

University of Maryland School of Pharmacy Baltimore Maryland USA.

Tara Driscoll (T)

University of Illinois Chicago College of Pharmacy Chicago Illinois USA.

Laura Knockel (L)

The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy Iowa City Iowa USA.

Jared Van Hooser (J)

University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy Duluth Minnesota USA.

Colleen Dula (C)

The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy Columbus Ohio USA.

Kristen Cook (K)

University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy Omaha Nebraska USA.

Morgan Stoa (M)

University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy Duluth Minnesota USA.

Amy Ives (A)

University of Maryland School of Pharmacy Baltimore Maryland USA.

Lucio Volino (L)

Rutgers University Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Piscataway New Jersey USA.

Nichole Rupnow (N)

University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy Duluth Minnesota USA.

Kristine Parbuoni (K)

University of Maryland School of Pharmacy Baltimore Maryland USA.

Jamie L Woodyard (JL)

Purdue University College of Pharmacy West Lafayette Indiana USA.

Classifications MeSH