Impact of the 2014 coinsurance rate revision for the elderly on healthcare resource utilization in Japan.

Elderly Health Health insurance Medical care Public health

Journal

Health economics review
ISSN: 2191-1991
Titre abrégé: Health Econ Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101583209

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 26 04 2021
accepted: 26 06 2021
entrez: 6 7 2021
pubmed: 7 7 2021
medline: 7 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cost sharing, including copayment and coinsurance, is often used to contain medical expenditure by decreasing unnecessary or excessive use of healthcare resources. Previous studies in Japan have reported the effects of a coinsurance rate reduction for healthcare from 30 to 10% on the demand for healthcare among 70-74-year-old individuals. However, the coinsurance rate for this age group has recently increased from 10 to 20%. This study aimed to estimate the economic impact of coinsurance rate revision on healthcare resource utilization. We collected claims data from beneficiaries of the municipality National Health Insurance and the Japanese Health Insurance Association in Fukuoka Prefecture. We categorized subjects born between March 2, 1944 and April 1, 1944 into the 20% coinsurance rate reduction group and those born between April 2, 1944 and May 1, 1944 into the 10% reduction group. An interrupted time-series analysis for multiple groups was employed to compare healthcare resource utilization trends before and after coinsurance rate reduction at 70 years. The 10% coinsurance rate reduction led to a significant increase in healthcare expenditure for outpatient care. The 20% reduction group showed a significantly sharper increase in healthcare expenditure for outpatient care than the 10% reduction group. Similarly, the 10% coinsurance group significantly increased in the number of ambulatory visits. The 20% coinsurance rate reduction group had more frequent ambulatory care visits than the 10% reduction group. These results suggest that increasing the coinsurance rate among the elderly would reduce outpatient healthcare resource utilization; however, it would not necessarily reduce overall healthcare resource utilization.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cost sharing, including copayment and coinsurance, is often used to contain medical expenditure by decreasing unnecessary or excessive use of healthcare resources. Previous studies in Japan have reported the effects of a coinsurance rate reduction for healthcare from 30 to 10% on the demand for healthcare among 70-74-year-old individuals. However, the coinsurance rate for this age group has recently increased from 10 to 20%. This study aimed to estimate the economic impact of coinsurance rate revision on healthcare resource utilization.
METHODS METHODS
We collected claims data from beneficiaries of the municipality National Health Insurance and the Japanese Health Insurance Association in Fukuoka Prefecture. We categorized subjects born between March 2, 1944 and April 1, 1944 into the 20% coinsurance rate reduction group and those born between April 2, 1944 and May 1, 1944 into the 10% reduction group. An interrupted time-series analysis for multiple groups was employed to compare healthcare resource utilization trends before and after coinsurance rate reduction at 70 years.
RESULTS RESULTS
The 10% coinsurance rate reduction led to a significant increase in healthcare expenditure for outpatient care. The 20% reduction group showed a significantly sharper increase in healthcare expenditure for outpatient care than the 10% reduction group. Similarly, the 10% coinsurance group significantly increased in the number of ambulatory visits. The 20% coinsurance rate reduction group had more frequent ambulatory care visits than the 10% reduction group.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that increasing the coinsurance rate among the elderly would reduce outpatient healthcare resource utilization; however, it would not necessarily reduce overall healthcare resource utilization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34228243
doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00324-0
pii: 10.1186/s13561-021-00324-0
pmc: PMC8262058
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

24

Subventions

Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
ID : 17K15873
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
ID : 19H03879

Références

Am Econ Rev. 1987 Jun;77(3):251-77
pubmed: 10284091
BMJ. 2015 Jun 09;350:h2750
pubmed: 26058820
J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;45:115-30
pubmed: 26603160
Am Econ Rev. 2010 Mar 1;100(1):193-213
pubmed: 21103385
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1231-8
pubmed: 20973870
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 28;18(1):22
pubmed: 30691462

Auteurs

Takumi Nishi (T)

Department of Research Planning and Information Management, Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences, 39 Mukaizano, Dazaifu-shi, Fukuoka, 818-0135, Japan. nishi@fihes.pref.fukuoka.jp.

Toshiki Maeda (T)

Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Susumu Katsuki (S)

Department of Research Planning and Information Management, Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences, 39 Mukaizano, Dazaifu-shi, Fukuoka, 818-0135, Japan.

Akira Babazono (A)

Department of Health Care Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Classifications MeSH