Diagnostic safety of a machine learning-based automatic patient selection algorithm for stress-only myocardial perfusion SPECT.


Journal

Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-6551
Titre abrégé: J Nucl Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9423534

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 17 05 2021
accepted: 18 05 2021
pubmed: 7 7 2021
medline: 15 10 2022
entrez: 6 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) markedly reduces radiation dose, scanning time, and cost. We developed an automated clinical algorithm to safely cancel unnecessary rest imaging with high sensitivity for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients without known CAD undergoing both MPI and invasive coronary angiography from REFINE SPECT were studied. A machine learning score (MLS) for prediction of obstructive CAD was generated using stress-only MPI and pre-test clinical variables. An MLS threshold with a pre-defined sensitivity of 95% was applied to the automated patient selection algorithm. Obstructive CAD was present in 1309/2079 (63%) patients. MLS had higher area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for prediction of CAD than reader diagnosis and TPD (0.84 vs 0.70 vs 0.78, P < .01). An MLS threshold of 0.29 had superior sensitivity than reader diagnosis and TPD for obstructive CAD (95% vs 87% vs 87%, P < .01) and high-risk CAD, defined as stenosis of the left main, proximal left anterior descending, or triple-vessel CAD (sensitivity 96% vs 89% vs 90%, P < .01). The MLS is highly sensitive for prediction of both obstructive and high-risk CAD from stress-only MPI and can be applied to a stress-first protocol for automatic cancellation of unnecessary rest imaging.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) markedly reduces radiation dose, scanning time, and cost. We developed an automated clinical algorithm to safely cancel unnecessary rest imaging with high sensitivity for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS AND RESULTS
Patients without known CAD undergoing both MPI and invasive coronary angiography from REFINE SPECT were studied. A machine learning score (MLS) for prediction of obstructive CAD was generated using stress-only MPI and pre-test clinical variables. An MLS threshold with a pre-defined sensitivity of 95% was applied to the automated patient selection algorithm. Obstructive CAD was present in 1309/2079 (63%) patients. MLS had higher area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for prediction of CAD than reader diagnosis and TPD (0.84 vs 0.70 vs 0.78, P < .01). An MLS threshold of 0.29 had superior sensitivity than reader diagnosis and TPD for obstructive CAD (95% vs 87% vs 87%, P < .01) and high-risk CAD, defined as stenosis of the left main, proximal left anterior descending, or triple-vessel CAD (sensitivity 96% vs 89% vs 90%, P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS
The MLS is highly sensitive for prediction of both obstructive and high-risk CAD from stress-only MPI and can be applied to a stress-first protocol for automatic cancellation of unnecessary rest imaging.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34228341
doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02698-4
pii: 10.1007/s12350-021-02698-4
pmc: PMC9020793
mid: NIHMS1792900
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2295-2307

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL089765
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Références

Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease. J Card Fail 2014;20:65-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.12.002
Einstein AJ, Pascual TN, Mercuri M, Karthikeyan G, Vitola JV, Mahmarian JJ, et al. Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: Results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS). Eur Heart J 2015;36:1689-96.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv117
Mercuri M, Pascual TN, Mahmarian JJ, Shaw LJ, Dondi M, Paez D, et al. Estimating the reduction in the radiation burden from nuclear cardiology through use of stress-only imaging in the united states and worldwide. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:269-73.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7106
Jerome SD, Tilkemeier PL, Farrell MB, Shaw LJ. Nationwide laboratory adherence to myocardial perfusion imaging radiation dose reduction practices: A report from the intersocietal accreditation commission data repository. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:1170-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.07.008
Gowd BM, Heller GV, Parker MW. Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: A review. J Nucl Cardiol 2014;21:1200-12.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9944-y
Bhalodkar NC, Blum S. Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: Similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2611-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.036
Ueyama T, Takehana K, Maeba H, Iwasaka T. Prognostic value of normal stress-only technetium-99m myocardial perfusion imaging protocol. Comparison with standard stress-rest protocol. Circ J 2012;76:2386-91.
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0081
Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian JJ. Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: Similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:221-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.022
Gowdar S, Chaudhry W, Ahlberg AW, Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL. Triage of patients for attenuation-corrected stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI using a simplified clinical pre-test scoring model. J Nucl Cardiol 2018;25:1178-87.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0832-0
Betancur J, Otaki Y, Motwani M, Fish MB, Lemley M, Dey D, et al. Prognostic value of combined clinical and myocardial perfusion imaging data using machine learning. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:1000-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.07.024
Hu LH, Betancur J, Sharir T, Einstein AJ, Bokhari S, Fish MB, et al. Machine learning predicts per-vessel early coronary revascularization after fast myocardial perfusion SPECT: results from multicentre REFINE SPECT registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;21:549-59.
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jez177
Hu LH, Miller RJH, Sharir T, Commandeur F, Rios R, Einstein AJ et al. Prognostically safe stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging guided by machine learning: Report from REFINE SPECT. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020.
Slomka PJ, Betancur J, Liang JX, Otaki Y, Hu LH, Sharir T, et al. Rationale and design of the REgistry of Fast Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with NExt generation SPECT (REFINE SPECT). J Nucl Cardiol 2020;27:1010-21.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1326-4
Miller RJH, Klein E, Gransar H, Slomka PJ, Friedman JD, Hayes S, et al. Prognostic significance of previous myocardial infarction and previous revascularization in patients undergoing SPECT MPI. Int J Cardiol 2020;313:9-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.012
Molinaro AM, Simon R, Pfeiffer RM. Prediction error estimation: A comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3301-7.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti499
Motwani M, Dey D, Berman DS, Germano G, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah MH, et al. Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis. Eur Heart J 2017;38:500-7.
pubmed: 27252451
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-45.
doi: 10.2307/2531595
Duvall WL, Hiensch RJ, Levine EJ, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. The prognosis of a normal Tl-201 stress-only SPECT MPI study. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:914-21.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9601-2
Duvall WL, Baber U, Levine EJ, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. A model for the prediction of a successful stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1124-34.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9606-x
Budoff MJ, Li D, Kazerooni EA, Thomas GS, Mieres JH, Shaw LJ. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study. A prospective multicenter trial. Acad Radiol 2017;24:22-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.008
George RT, Mehra VC, Chen MY, Kitagawa K, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Myocardial CT perfusion imaging and SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A head-to-head comparison from the CORE320 multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology 2015;274:626.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.14144050
Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Min JK, Hachamovitch R, Abidov A, Germano G, et al. SPECT/PET myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary CT angiography in patients with known or suspected CAD. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;54:177-200.
pubmed: 20592682
Nakanishi R, Gransar H, Slomka P, Arsanjani R, Shalev A, Otaki Y, et al. Predictors of high-risk coronary artery disease in subjects with normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:530-41.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0150-3
Cosmai EM, Heller GV. The clinical importance of electrocardiographic changes during pharmacologic stress testing with radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:466-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.04.011
Emmett L, Iwanochko RM, Freeman MR, Barolet A, Lee DS, Husain M. Reversible regional wall motion abnormalities on exercise technetium-99m-gated cardiac single photon emission computed tomography predict high-grade angiographic stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:991-8.
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01707-2
Otaki Y, Betancur J, Sharir T, Hu L-H, Gransar H, Liang JX, et al. 5-year prognostic value of quantitative versus visual mpi in subtle perfusion defects. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:774-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.028
Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Kuest SM, Pazhenkottil AP, Wolfrum M, Nkoulou RN, et al. Nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with a novel cadmium-zinc-telluride detector SPECT/CT device: First validation versus invasive coronary angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:2025-30.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1877-y

Auteurs

Evann Eisenberg (E)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Robert J H Miller (RJH)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Lien-Hsin Hu (LH)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Richard Rios (R)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Julian Betancur (J)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Peyman Azadani (P)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Donghee Han (D)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Tali Sharir (T)

Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Andrew J Einstein (AJ)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Sabahat Bokhari (S)

Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Mathews B Fish (MB)

Sacred Heart Medical Center, Springfield, OR, USA.

Terrence D Ruddy (TD)

University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Philipp A Kaufmann (PA)

University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Albert J Sinusas (AJ)

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Edward J Miller (EJ)

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Timothy M Bateman (TM)

Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies LLC, Kansas City, MO, USA.

Sharmila Dorbala (S)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Marcelo Di Carli (M)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Joanna X Liang (JX)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Yuka Otaki (Y)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Balaji K Tamarappoo (BK)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Damini Dey (D)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Daniel S Berman (DS)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Piotr J Slomka (PJ)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Ste. Metro 203, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. slomkap@cshs.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH