Impact of Digital Educational Interventions to Support Parents Caring for Acutely Ill Children at Home and Factors That Affect Their Use: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
acute disease
child
child health
childhood disease
childhood illness
digital intervention
health education
health literacy
help-seeking behavior
mHealth
pediatrics
primary care
sick child
telemedicine
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 06 2021
30 06 2021
Historique:
received:
27
01
2021
accepted:
07
04
2021
revised:
04
03
2021
entrez:
6
7
2021
pubmed:
7
7
2021
medline:
7
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Urgent and emergency care health services are overburdened, and the use of these services by acutely ill infants and children is increasing. A large proportion of these visits could be sufficiently addressed by other health care professionals. Uncertainty about the severity of a child's symptoms is one of many factors that play a role in parents' decisions to take their children to emergency services, demonstrating the need for improved support for health literacy. Digital interventions are a potential tool to improve parents' knowledge, confidence, and self-efficacy at managing acute childhood illness. However, existing systematic reviews related to this topic need to be updated and expanded to provide a contemporary review of the impact, usability, and limitations of these solutions. The purpose of this systematic review protocol is to present the method for an evaluation of the impact, usability, and limitations of different types of digital educational interventions to support parents caring for acutely ill children at home. The review will be structured using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) and Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) frameworks. Five databases will be systematically searched for studies published in English during and after 2014: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, APA PsycNet, and Web of Science. Two reviewers will independently screen references' titles and abstracts, select studies for inclusion based on the eligibility criteria, and extract the data into a standardized form. Any disagreements will be discussed and resolved by a third reviewer if necessary. Risk of bias of all studies will be assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and a descriptive analysis will be used to evaluate the outcomes reported. The systematic review will commence during 2021. This systematic review will summarize the impact, usability, and limitations of digital interventions for parents with acutely ill children. It will provide an overview of the field; identify reported impacts on health and behavioral outcomes as well as parental knowledge, satisfaction, and decision making; and identify the factors that affect use to help inform the development of more effective and sustainable interventions. PRR1-10.2196/27504.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Urgent and emergency care health services are overburdened, and the use of these services by acutely ill infants and children is increasing. A large proportion of these visits could be sufficiently addressed by other health care professionals. Uncertainty about the severity of a child's symptoms is one of many factors that play a role in parents' decisions to take their children to emergency services, demonstrating the need for improved support for health literacy. Digital interventions are a potential tool to improve parents' knowledge, confidence, and self-efficacy at managing acute childhood illness. However, existing systematic reviews related to this topic need to be updated and expanded to provide a contemporary review of the impact, usability, and limitations of these solutions.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this systematic review protocol is to present the method for an evaluation of the impact, usability, and limitations of different types of digital educational interventions to support parents caring for acutely ill children at home.
METHODS
The review will be structured using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) and Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) frameworks. Five databases will be systematically searched for studies published in English during and after 2014: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, APA PsycNet, and Web of Science. Two reviewers will independently screen references' titles and abstracts, select studies for inclusion based on the eligibility criteria, and extract the data into a standardized form. Any disagreements will be discussed and resolved by a third reviewer if necessary. Risk of bias of all studies will be assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and a descriptive analysis will be used to evaluate the outcomes reported.
RESULTS
The systematic review will commence during 2021.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review will summarize the impact, usability, and limitations of digital interventions for parents with acutely ill children. It will provide an overview of the field; identify reported impacts on health and behavioral outcomes as well as parental knowledge, satisfaction, and decision making; and identify the factors that affect use to help inform the development of more effective and sustainable interventions.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
PRR1-10.2196/27504.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34228628
pii: v10i6e27504
doi: 10.2196/27504
pmc: PMC8280832
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e27504Investigateurs
Wendy Clyne
(W)
Ron Daniels
(R)
Linda Glennie
(L)
Matt Halkes
(M)
Hugh Kelly
(H)
Amy Wyatt-Haines
(A)
Richard Wyatt-Haines
(R)
Joanne Hughes
(J)
Alex Leach
(A)
William Lilley
(W)
Paula Lorgelly
(P)
Lucie Riches
(L)
Informations de copyright
©Madison Milne-Ives, Sarah Neill, Natasha Bayes, Mitch Blair, Jane Blewitt, Lucy Bray, Enitan D Carrol, Bernie Carter, Rob Dawson, Paul Dimitri, Monica Lakhanpaul, Damian Roland, Alison Tavare, Edward Meinert, ASK SNIFF Consortium. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 30.06.2021.
Références
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018 May 30;2(1):e000247
pubmed: 29942865
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Aug 28;23:4141-4148
pubmed: 28845042
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):843-851
pubmed: 27745684
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Feb 27;70(692):e172-e178
pubmed: 32041764
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 10;20(10):e10361
pubmed: 30305263
Perspect Public Health. 2014 Mar;134(2):93-100
pubmed: 24336511
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e033761
pubmed: 32371509
ACP J Club. 1995 Nov-Dec;123(3):A12-3
pubmed: 7582737
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236013
pubmed: 32702034
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):663
pubmed: 32680518
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 28;16(7):
pubmed: 30925706
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Apr;18(3):289-296
pubmed: 28625711
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 15;7(283):283rv3
pubmed: 25877894
Pediatr Rev. 2019 Jun;40(6):263-277
pubmed: 31152099
J Child Health Care. 2010 Dec;14(4):327-44
pubmed: 20823078
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Mar;55(3):271-277
pubmed: 30570182
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 16;5(12):e008280
pubmed: 26674495
Int J Equity Health. 2020 May 1;19(1):58
pubmed: 32357879
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Feb;167(2):112-8
pubmed: 23254373
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:49-59.e1
pubmed: 30905698
BMC Med. 2018 Sep 17;16(1):151
pubmed: 30220255
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;177(3):381-388
pubmed: 29260375
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Apr;36(4):e192-e198
pubmed: 30624425
JRSM Open. 2016 Feb 12;7(3):2054270415623695
pubmed: 26981256
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2811-2819
pubmed: 31350761