Management of a Mobile Floating Carotid Plaque Responsible for Calcified Cerebral Emboli: A Double Sword of Damocles.

Calcified cerebral emboli Endarterectomy Mobile carotid plaque Stroke Ultrasonography

Journal

EJVES vascular forum
ISSN: 2666-688X
Titre abrégé: EJVES Vasc Forum
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101766732

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 20 09 2019
revised: 18 11 2019
accepted: 26 11 2019
entrez: 6 7 2021
pubmed: 7 7 2021
medline: 7 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The management of a rare case of calcified cerebral emboli associated with a mobile carotid plaque (MCP) is reported and discussed. A 76 year old patient presented with sudden weakness of the left lower limb one month ago, which resolved spontaneously. A cerebral magnetic resonance imaging showed recent multiple infarcts in the right middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. Computed tomography cerebral angiogram (CTA) revealed calcified cerebral emboli (CCE) in the right MCA territory and an isolated calcified embolus in the M3 segment of the right MCA. No calcification was observed in the aorta. The echocardiogram findings were normal. Trans-oesophageal echocardiography did not show aortic or mitral valve calcifications. A cervical duplex ultrasound (DUS) was performed and demonstrated a highly mobile carotid plaque located in the right carotid bifurcation, contrasting with static CTA imaging showing a common calcified plaque, probably because the plaque appeared against the carotid wall during image acquisition. Antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy were initiated, and carotid endarterectomy was performed on day two to prevent further embolisation. One month follow up including carotid DUS was satisfactory. A case of mobile carotid plaque responsible for CCE which was diagnosed with DUS dynamic imaging is described, emphasizing the importance of multimodal imaging in such settings. Though the treatment of MCP remains controversial because of the paucity of published cases, carotid endarterectomy was considered to be the safest option to prevent recurrent stroke. Additional clinical data including large series and controlled trials are required to determine the best management of mobile carotid plaques with less than 50% diameter carotid stenosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34228771
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvssr.2019.11.004
pii: S2405-6553(19)30048-9
pmc: PMC8077171
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

69-72

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors.

Références

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Apr 17;:
pubmed: 29665308
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2009 Jul;12(3):185-7
pubmed: 20174501
J Endovasc Ther. 2003 Jun;10(3):653-6
pubmed: 12932182
Stroke. 2001 Nov;32(11):2559-66
pubmed: 11692017
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Jan;24(1):138-43
pubmed: 25440329
Arch Neurol. 2002 Dec;59(12):1866-8
pubmed: 12470172
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):199-205
pubmed: 17210411
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Aug;35(8):1515-9
pubmed: 24651819
J Neurol. 1988 Sep;235(7):425-7
pubmed: 3065465
J Neurosurg. 2013 Jan;118(1):34-41
pubmed: 23061393

Auteurs

Jean Sénémaud (J)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France.

Gaël Bounkong (G)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France.

Lilia Seddik (L)

Department of Neurology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France.

Asma Jaziri (A)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France.

Joseph Touma (J)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France.

Classifications MeSH