Harsh is large: nonlinear vocal phenomena lower voice pitch and exaggerate body size.
acoustic communication
body size
nonlinear vocal phenomena
pitch
roughness
voice
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 07 2021
14 07 2021
Historique:
entrez:
7
7
2021
pubmed:
8
7
2021
medline:
4
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A lion's roar, a dog's bark, an angry yell in a pub brawl: what do these vocalizations have in common? They all sound harsh due to nonlinear vocal phenomena (NLP)-deviations from regular voice production, hypothesized to lower perceived voice pitch and thereby exaggerate the apparent body size of the vocalizer. To test this yet uncorroborated hypothesis, we synthesized human nonverbal vocalizations, such as roars, groans and screams, with and without NLP (amplitude modulation, subharmonics and chaos). We then measured their effects on nearly 700 listeners' perceptions of three psychoacoustic (pitch, timbre, roughness) and three ecological (body size, formidability, aggression) characteristics. In an explicit rating task, all NLP lowered perceived voice pitch, increased voice darkness and roughness, and caused vocalizers to sound larger, more formidable and more aggressive. Key results were replicated in an implicit associations test, suggesting that the 'harsh is large' bias will arise in ecologically relevant confrontational contexts that involve a rapid, and largely implicit, evaluation of the opponent's size. In sum, nonlinearities in human vocalizations can flexibly communicate both formidability and intention to attack, suggesting they are not a mere byproduct of loud vocalizing, but rather an informative acoustic signal well suited for intimidating potential opponents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34229494
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0872
pmc: PMC8261225
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5479636']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20210872Références
Cogn Psychol. 1992 Jan;24(1):99-142
pubmed: 1537233
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):758-771
pubmed: 27130172
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Aug;220(3-4):319-33
pubmed: 22706551
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 10;6:31660
pubmed: 27721476
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 12;12(1):968
pubmed: 33579910
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Aug;102(2 Pt 1):1213-22
pubmed: 9265764
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Oct;33(5):1208-19
pubmed: 17924818
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Dec 2;7(12):201306
pubmed: 33489278
J Exp Biol. 2008 Jun;211(Pt 12):1978-91
pubmed: 18515729
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 27;283(1829):
pubmed: 27122553
J Exp Child Psychol. 1980 Oct;30(2):290-307
pubmed: 7430946
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0213034
pubmed: 30830931
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):764-777
pubmed: 30547381
Phonetica. 1984;41(1):1-16
pubmed: 6204347
J Exp Biol. 2006 Dec;209(Pt 24):4984-93
pubmed: 17142687
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;288(1954):20210872
pubmed: 34229494
J Voice. 2002 Dec;16(4):443-59
pubmed: 12512631
Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 3;25(15):2051-6
pubmed: 26190070
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):778-792
pubmed: 30054898
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 24;11(1):4468
pubmed: 33627739
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2004;29(4):147-53
pubmed: 15764208
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2275-84
pubmed: 21973383
J Voice. 2001 Jun;15(2):165-75
pubmed: 11411471
J Exp Biol. 2016 Apr 15;219(Pt 8):1224-36
pubmed: 27103677
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 30;6:34389
pubmed: 27687571
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Mar;121(3):1758-67
pubmed: 17407912
Nat Commun. 2016 Sep 06;7:12739
pubmed: 27598835