Application of low-dose CT combined with model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in oncologic patients during follow-up: dose reduction and image quality.
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2021
01 Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
9
7
2021
medline:
6
8
2021
entrez:
8
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare image quality and radiation dose of CT images reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and hybrid-iterative (HIR) algorithm in oncologic patients. 125 oncologic patients underwent both contrast-enhanced low- (100 kV), and standard (120 kV) dose CT, were enrolled. Image quality was assessed by using a 4-point Likert scale. CT attenuation values, expressed in Hounsfield unit (HU), were recorded within a regions of interest (ROI) of liver, spleen, paraspinal muscle, aortic lumen, and subcutaneous fat tissue. Image noise, expressed as standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Radiation dose were analyzed. Paired Student's The overall median score assessed as image quality for CT images with the MBIR algorithm was significantly higher in comparison with HIR [4 (range 3-4) MBIR combined with low-kV setting allows an important dose reduction in whole-body CT imaging, reaching a better image quality both qualitatively and quantitatively. MBIR with low-dose approach allows a reduction of dose exposure, maintaining high image quality, especially in patients which deserve a longlasting follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34233459
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201223
pmc: PMC8764930
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20201223Références
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jan;84(1):2-10
pubmed: 25458225
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(4):613-9
pubmed: 24651746
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
pubmed: 18046031
Eur Radiol. 2015 Aug;25(8):2362-70
pubmed: 25749813
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan;86:190-197
pubmed: 28027746
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2014 Jun;45(2):131-136
pubmed: 31051943
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11514
pubmed: 30045274
Neuroradiology. 2016 Mar;58(3):245-51
pubmed: 26715558
Eur Radiol. 2012 Aug;22(8):1613-23
pubmed: 22538629
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1735-6; author reply 1736-7
pubmed: 23158241
Insights Imaging. 2011 Aug;2(4):357-362
pubmed: 22358387
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Sep;42(9):2279-2288
pubmed: 28417170
Radiographics. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(7):1823-32
pubmed: 21969662
Acad Radiol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1114-1124
pubmed: 28365232
Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2521-6
pubmed: 21822785
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jan 6;112(1):185-93
pubmed: 25314057
Br J Radiol. 2008 May;81(965):362-78
pubmed: 18440940
Neuroradiology. 2018 Dec;60(12):1273-1280
pubmed: 30196373
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505
pubmed: 22681860
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep;199(3):588-94
pubmed: 22915398