Morphometric evaluation of canine hepatocellular carcinoma using computed tomography: a promising tool for predicting malignancy.
differentiation
dog
hepatic tumor
morphometry
Journal
The Journal of veterinary medical science
ISSN: 1347-7439
Titre abrégé: J Vet Med Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9105360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2021
27 Sep 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
9
7
2021
medline:
29
9
2021
entrez:
8
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The size of canine focal liver lesions (FLLs) is known to be one of the predicting criteria for malignancy. However, there are discrepancies for the measurement of maximum lesion size, resulting in contradicting results among studies and incidences of false positive outcomes. Thus far, the morphometric changes of FLLs for distinguishing malignancy from benignancy remains undocumented. This study aimed to investigate morphometric characteristics of FLLs using computed tomography (CT). CT images of 40 dogs with histopathological confirmation of 49 liver lesions, including 39 hepatocellular carcinomas and 10 nodular hyperplasias were retrospectively reviewed. The morphometric parameters including size (long and short axis diameters measured on transverse image), shape (measured by long to short axis (L/S) ratio), volume, and surface appearance of a liver lesion were evaluated using univariate and stepwise multivariate analyses, respectively. The results of univariate analysis showed that long and short axis diameters, L/S ratio, volume, and surface appearance of a lesion were significantly different between hepatocellular carcinomas and nodular hyperplasias. Multivariate analysis revealed that short axis diameter (>3.30 cm; odds ratio (OR): 36.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.36-387.05, P=0.0031) and L/S ratio (>1.23; OR: 18.1, 95% CI: 1.61-205.12, P=0.0191) were independent predictors of malignancy, with the area under the curve of 0.9154. These results suggest that the combination of short axis diameter and L/S ratio is a promising tool for predicting liver malignancy with outstanding discriminating ability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34234070
doi: 10.1292/jvms.21-0218
pmc: PMC8498825
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1459-1464Références
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2012 May-Jun;53(3):252-7
pubmed: 22244075
Am J Vet Res. 2017 Nov;78(11):1273-1283
pubmed: 29076364
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2020 Feb;118(1):11-17
pubmed: 31984690
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2009 Sep-Oct;50(5):513-8
pubmed: 19788037
Acad Radiol. 2020 Dec;27(12):1720-1726
pubmed: 29941397
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2014 Jan-Feb;55(1):7-15
pubmed: 24102918
Vet Pathol. 1980 Sep;17(5):553-64
pubmed: 7404966
J Vet Med Sci. 2019 May 31;81(5):723-729
pubmed: 30956270
Am J Vet Res. 2012 Jun;73(6):821-9
pubmed: 22620696
Clin Radiol. 1997 Dec;52(12):927-32
pubmed: 9413967
J Vet Med Sci. 2019 Dec 18;81(12):1697-1704
pubmed: 31597816
Hiroshima J Med Sci. 2009 Mar;58(1):17-24
pubmed: 19400553
Am J Surg. 1991 Oct;162(4):362-6
pubmed: 1951890
J Vet Intern Med. 2019 May;33(3):1403-1413
pubmed: 30883935
Br J Radiol. 1995 Mar;68(807):266-70
pubmed: 7735765
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 Oct 15;225(8):1225-30
pubmed: 15521445
Vet Pathol. 1981 Jul;18(4):427-38
pubmed: 6266116
Radiology. 1984 Sep;152(3):771-3
pubmed: 6463260