Differential binding of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein variants to its cognate receptor hACE2 using molecular modeling based binding analysis.
RBD
SARS-CoV-2
Spike protein
binding affinity
hACE2
molecular docking
molecular modeling
Journal
Bioinformation
ISSN: 0973-2063
Titre abrégé: Bioinformation
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101258255
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
05
01
2021
revised:
24
02
2021
accepted:
27
02
2021
entrez:
8
7
2021
pubmed:
9
7
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The current emergence of novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 and its ceaseless expansion worldwide has posed a global health emergency that has adversely affected the humans. With the entire world striving to understand the newly emerged virus, differences in morbidity and infection rate of SARS-CoV-2 have been observed across varied geographic areas, which have been ascribed to viral mutation and evolution over time. The homotrimeric Spike (S) glycoprotein on the viral envelope surface is responsible for binding, priming, and initiating infection in the host. Our phylogeny analysis of 1947 sequences of S proteins indicated there is a change in amino acid (aa) from aspartate (Group-A) to glycine (Group-B) at position 614, near the receptor- binding domain (RBD; aa positions 331-524). The two variants are reported to be in circulation, disproportionately across the world, with Group-A dominant in Asia and Group-B in North America. The trimeric, monomeric, and RBD of S protein of both the variant groups (A & B) were modeled using the Swiss-Model server and were docked with the human receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) employing the PatchDock server and visualized in PyMol. Group-A S protein's RBD bound imperceptibly to the two binding clefts of the hACE2 protein, on the other hand, Group-B S protein's RBD perfectly interacted inside the binding clefts of hACE2, with higher number of hydrogen and hydrophobic interactions. This implies that the S protein's amino acid at position 614 near the core RBD influences its interaction with the cognate hACE2 receptor, which may induce its infectivity that should be explored further with molecular and biochemical studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34234394
doi: 10.6026/97320630017337
pii: 97320630017337
pmc: PMC8225600
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
337-347Informations de copyright
© 2021 Biomedical Informatics.
Références
FEBS Lett. 1995 Oct 30;374(2):253-6
pubmed: 7589547
Comput Biol Chem. 2005 Jun;29(3):254-7
pubmed: 15979045
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Pathogens. 2020 Mar 04;9(3):
pubmed: 32143502
J Virol. 2020 Mar 17;94(7):
pubmed: 31996437
PLoS Pathog. 2015 Nov 06;11(11):e1005261
pubmed: 26545254
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
Infect Genet Evol. 2020 Oct;84:104330
pubmed: 32335334
Bioinformatics. 2020 Mar 1;36(6):1765-1771
pubmed: 31697312
Nature. 2020 May;581(7807):215-220
pubmed: 32225176
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):13967-13974
pubmed: 32503918
Viruses. 2020 Jan 10;12(1):
pubmed: 31936749
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273
pubmed: 32015507
Science. 2020 Mar 13;367(6483):1260-1263
pubmed: 32075877
J Virol. 2011 Jun;85(11):5331-7
pubmed: 21411533
JFMS Open Rep. 2019 Jun 26;5(1):2055116919856103
pubmed: 31534775
Cell. 1998 Oct 30;95(3):409-17
pubmed: 9814710
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):450-452
pubmed: 32284615
Cell. 2020 Apr 16;181(2):281-292.e6
pubmed: 32155444
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 Mar;7(3):226-36
pubmed: 19198616
J Biol Chem. 2004 Jan 30;279(5):3197-201
pubmed: 14670965
Science. 2005 Sep 16;309(5742):1864-8
pubmed: 16166518
Science. 2020 Mar 27;367(6485):1444-1448
pubmed: 32132184
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;19(7):1066-73
pubmed: 23763835
J Virol. 1985 Dec;56(3):912-20
pubmed: 2999444