Demographic Characteristics and Treatment Patterns Among Patients Receiving Palbociclib for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Real-World Experience.
metastatic breast cancer
palbociclib
real-world
retrospective
Journal
OncoTargets and therapy
ISSN: 1178-6930
Titre abrégé: Onco Targets Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101514322
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
18
03
2021
accepted:
12
06
2021
entrez:
8
7
2021
pubmed:
9
7
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This nationwide retrospective study reports data on the real-world use of the selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib in a large population of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients during a 2-year period in Hungary. All patients with ABC who received palbociclib between May 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019 were included in the analysis. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, disease-related factors and treatment patterns were examined during the early access program and in the regular reimbursement period. Altogether, 962 patients were included (mean age: 60.6 years). A total of 399 patients (41%) were treated with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitors (P+AI), and 563 patients (59%) received palbociclib and fulvestrant (P+F). The most commonly prescribed AI was letrozole (n=359; 90%). Of those with metastatic disease (n=733; 76%), 241 patients (33%) had visceral metastases and 449 (61%) had bone-only disease. The majority of patients (79%) received palbociclib as first- or second-line therapy for ABC. The starting dose of palbociclib was 125 mg in 98% of patients; dose reductions were required in 32% of patients receiving P+AI and 31% of those treated with P+F. At the time of data collection, palbociclib therapy was ongoing in 270 patients (68%) in the P+AI group and 245 patients (44%) in the P+F group. This nationwide analysis is the first to provide insights into the real-world use of palbociclib in a large patient population from a Central-Eastern European country. The findings confirm the good tolerability of palbociclib with similar dose reduction rates to those reported from registration trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This nationwide retrospective study reports data on the real-world use of the selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib in a large population of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients during a 2-year period in Hungary.
METHODS
METHODS
All patients with ABC who received palbociclib between May 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019 were included in the analysis. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, disease-related factors and treatment patterns were examined during the early access program and in the regular reimbursement period.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Altogether, 962 patients were included (mean age: 60.6 years). A total of 399 patients (41%) were treated with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitors (P+AI), and 563 patients (59%) received palbociclib and fulvestrant (P+F). The most commonly prescribed AI was letrozole (n=359; 90%). Of those with metastatic disease (n=733; 76%), 241 patients (33%) had visceral metastases and 449 (61%) had bone-only disease. The majority of patients (79%) received palbociclib as first- or second-line therapy for ABC. The starting dose of palbociclib was 125 mg in 98% of patients; dose reductions were required in 32% of patients receiving P+AI and 31% of those treated with P+F. At the time of data collection, palbociclib therapy was ongoing in 270 patients (68%) in the P+AI group and 245 patients (44%) in the P+F group.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This nationwide analysis is the first to provide insights into the real-world use of palbociclib in a large patient population from a Central-Eastern European country. The findings confirm the good tolerability of palbociclib with similar dose reduction rates to those reported from registration trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34234466
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S309862
pii: 309862
pmc: PMC8257075
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3971-3981Informations de copyright
© 2021 Boér et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Katalin Boér has been a consultant or on the advisory board for Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. György Rokszin and Zsolt Abonyi-Tóth are employees of RxTarget Ltd., where their contribution to this study analysis was financially compensated by Pfizer Hungary Ltd. During the writing of the manuscript Csenge Földesi was employee of and owned stock in Pfizer Inc. Magdolna Dank has been a consultant or on the advisory board for Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche. Gábor Rubovszky had consulting or lecturer fee from Amgen, Eli Lilly, MDS, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SWIXX. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;168(2):381-387
pubmed: 29218462
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Apr;100:57-68
pubmed: 26944782
Breast. 2018 Apr;38:86-91
pubmed: 29287189
Breast. 2019 Feb;43:22-27
pubmed: 30391832
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Feb;15(3):407-20
pubmed: 24369047
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Nov-Dec;6(6):i-ii
pubmed: 25628499
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 Mar;74:21-28
pubmed: 30685576
J Glob Oncol. 2019 May;5:JGO1800239
pubmed: 31050919
J Cell Physiol. 2019 Jun;234(6):7708-7717
pubmed: 30536609
Future Oncol. 2020 Nov;16(32):2661-2672
pubmed: 32805138
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1925-1936
pubmed: 27959613
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Jun 17;14:1058
pubmed: 32582373
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 28;106(5):
pubmed: 24777111
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar;142(3):669-78
pubmed: 26531187
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jan;57(1):129-134
pubmed: 29202645
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):25-35
pubmed: 25524798
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jan;14(1):174-179
pubmed: 30841738
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 Sep;13:16-22
pubmed: 29073982
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Sep;30(9):931-941
pubmed: 31280456
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jul;21(7):1115-25
pubmed: 22573797
Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Apr;17(2):79-90
pubmed: 27687476
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;174(3):719-729
pubmed: 30632023
Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1623-1649
pubmed: 32979513
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Aug;70(8):989-95
pubmed: 25733718
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-439
pubmed: 26947331
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 03;21(17):
pubmed: 32899139
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):209-19
pubmed: 26030518
JAMA. 2001 Feb 21;285(7):885-92
pubmed: 11180731
J Pers Med. 2015 Jun 26;5(3):229-42
pubmed: 26132751
Future Oncol. 2020 Nov;16(31):2475-2485
pubmed: 32787449