Perinatal Outcomes and Influence of Amniotic Fluid Volume Following Previable, Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes (pPPROM): A Historical Cohort Study.
amniotic fluid
neonatal survival
pregnancy complications
prelabor rupture of membranes
prematurity
previability
Journal
International journal of women's health
ISSN: 1179-1411
Titre abrégé: Int J Womens Health
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101531698
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
17
02
2021
accepted:
02
06
2021
entrez:
8
7
2021
pubmed:
9
7
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine perinatal outcomes and influence of amniotic fluid volume in pregnancies complicated by previable, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (pPPROM). This was a historical cohort study from two tertiary-level maternity hospitals (January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2015). All pregnancies complicated by pPPROM were identified using ICD coding of discharge abstracts. Hospital charts were reviewed to collect maternal demographics, pregnancy and delivery events, and immediate postnatal outcomes (including survival). Post-processing review of stored ultrasound images was performed to evaluate the relationship between amniotic fluid volume and outcomes. A total of 113 pregnancies were eligible and 99 were included in the final analysis (74 with "expectant management" and 25 opting for elective termination). The median gestational age at pPPROM was 20+6 weeks [IQR 19+4 to 21+5]. For those choosing expectant management, the median latency between pPPROM and delivery was 7 days, median gestational at delivery was 23+1 weeks, and neonatal survival to discharge was 27.5% overall. There was a trend towards higher rates of pregnancy termination at one hospital (31.7%) compared to the other (15.4%), but no difference between sites with respect to latency, mode of delivery, or survival amongst those managed expectantly. There was a relationship between survival and gestational age at pPPROM ( After expectant management, more than one in four newborns following pPPROM survived to hospital discharge. While gestational age at rupture was most strongly correlated with survival, normal initial amniotic fluid volumes were mostly seen in survivors whereas stillbirths more frequently had anhydramnios. These findings will help to improve counseling and care of patients with pPPROM and in guiding long-term follow-up studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34234574
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S303120
pii: 303120
pmc: PMC8254139
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
627-637Informations de copyright
© 2021 Pylypjuk and Majeau.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Christy Pylypjuk reports receiving grants from Manitoba Medical Services Foundation and Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, and the Winnipeg Foundation Martha Donovan Women’s Leadership Award, as well as transportation and lodging to speak at the annual conference of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (no direct payments received), outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Jan;32(1):57-62
pubmed: 24819145
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;50(2):487-96
pubmed: 17513934
JAMA. 1997 Sep 24;278(12):989-95
pubmed: 9307346
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;47(4):633-651
pubmed: 33121650
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 3;20(1):662
pubmed: 33143671
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 04;10(1):
pubmed: 33406795
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 May;301(5):1207-1212
pubmed: 32274636
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1039-51
pubmed: 26348753
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 29;16:25
pubmed: 26831896
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;47(4):587-594
pubmed: 33121646
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Nov;24(11):874-83
pubmed: 12417902
Klin Padiatr. 2016 Mar;228(2):69-76
pubmed: 26886145
Clin Perinatol. 2001 Dec;28(4):849-60
pubmed: 11758532
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;26(2):67-76
pubmed: 24614021
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Aug;2(3):100176
pubmed: 33345890
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;47(4):595-603
pubmed: 33121647
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;183(4):925-9
pubmed: 11035339
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Nov 15;5:100102
pubmed: 32021974
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 13;19(1):282
pubmed: 31409304
J Perinat Med. 2017 Jan 1;45(1):29-44
pubmed: 27780154
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Aug;91(8):923-9
pubmed: 22536879
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1497-502
pubmed: 15507990
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;285(6):1529-34
pubmed: 22203092
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;201(3):230-40
pubmed: 19733274
Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(8):465-472
pubmed: 32902844