Willingness to Share yet Maintain Influence: A Cross-Sectional Study on Attitudes in Sweden to the Use of Electronic Health Data.


Journal

Public health ethics
ISSN: 1754-9973
Titre abrégé: Public Health Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101463048

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
entrez: 8 7 2021
pubmed: 9 7 2021
medline: 9 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We have investigated attitudes towards the use of health data among the Swedish population by analyzing data from a survey answered by 1645 persons. Health data are potentially useful for a variety of purposes. Yet information about health remains sensitive. A balance therefore has to be struck between these opposing considerations in a number of contexts. The attitudes among those whose data is concerned will influence the perceived legitimacy of policies regulating health data use. We aimed to investigate what views are held by the general public, and what aspects matter for the willingness to let one's data be used not only for one's own care but also for other purposes. We found that while there is a broad willingness to let one's data be used, the possibility to influence that use is considered important. The study also indicated that when respondents are required to balance different interests, priority is typically given to compulsory schemes ensuring that data are available where needed, rather than voluntary participation and data protection. The policy implications to be drawn from this are not self-evident, however, since the fact that a majority has a certain attitude does not by itself determine the most adequate policy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34234841
doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa035
pii: phaa035
pmc: PMC8254641
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

23-34

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Références

Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Jun 21;2(4):230-243
pubmed: 29507784
J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Fall;31(3):429-33
pubmed: 14626550
Scand J Public Health. 2002;30(2):81-5
pubmed: 12028856
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1373-5
pubmed: 19336713
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jul 17;16:48
pubmed: 26183438
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2012 Jan;21(1):40-50
pubmed: 22152457
J Med Ethics. 2011 Jan;37(1):50-5
pubmed: 21071570
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Jul;71:143-146
pubmed: 28578074
Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):32-3
pubmed: 18987719
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 6;166(11):842-843
pubmed: 28462419
Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 Sep;13(9):1071-6
pubmed: 15986039
Elife. 2020 Jul 07;9:
pubmed: 32633718
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:93-102
pubmed: 23974554
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Fall;37(3):507-12
pubmed: 19723261
BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Jul 24;10:10
pubmed: 19630941
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2014 Dec;10:15
pubmed: 26085451
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jan;64(1):223-35
pubmed: 17045717
BMJ. 2016 Jul 14;354:i3636
pubmed: 27418128
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):303-41
pubmed: 26002496
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 01;20(11):e278
pubmed: 30389647
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;31(2):125-36
pubmed: 26769609
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:341-345
pubmed: 29677979
Health Policy. 2019 Jun;123(6):564-571
pubmed: 30961905
J Legal Stud. 2001 Jun;30(2):709-14
pubmed: 12656087
Eur J Health Law. 2007 Jul;14(2):105-12
pubmed: 17847827
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:336-340
pubmed: 29677978

Auteurs

Sara Belfrage (S)

Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics; Karolinska Institutet.

Niels Lynöe (N)

Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics; Karolinska Institutet.

Gert Helgesson (G)

Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics; Karolinska Institutet.

Classifications MeSH