Deposition of dust with active substances in pesticides from treated seeds in adjacent fields during drilling: disentangling the effects of various factors using an 8-year field experiment.
Adjacent field
Drilling technique
Dust drift deposition
Exposure
Non-target organisms (NTA)
Responsible Editor: Ester Heath
Seed treatment
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
30
03
2021
accepted:
28
06
2021
pubmed:
9
7
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
8
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The side effects from the use of plant protection products and their potential effects on non-target arthropods (NTAs) such as honey bees, other insects within the vegetation layer and epigeic arthropods nowadays receive more attention. However, uncertainties about the factors driving the deposition of active substances (a.s.) into off-crop areas persist, in particular during sowing of treated seeds. Analysing a highly standardised 8-year field experiment, we assessed the importance of various factors potentially affecting dust drift and deposition of a.s., emitted during the sowing process of treated seeds and deposited on fields adjacent to the drilling field, i.e. on the ground, on flowers, and on nonflowering plant parts. Regarding a.s. deposition, the Heubach a.s. value has a predictive capability, which is independent from all other factors taken into account in this study, and can thus be considered as a scenario-independent measure of potential dust deposition. Petri dish samplers, an established standard method for measuring a.s. deposition, were representative of the results from the plant samplers for a given combination of drilling technique and adjacent crop type. Adjacent crop type is likely to impact on a.s. deposition. The present work will enable a more field-realistic exposure assessment for bees and other NTAs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34235683
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15247-w
pii: 10.1007/s11356-021-15247-w
pmc: PMC8642378
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dust
0
Pesticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
66613-66627Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 6;46(5):2592-9
pubmed: 22292570
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016 Feb;35(2):303-10
pubmed: 26395849
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Nov 3;49(21):12731-40
pubmed: 26439915
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Jun;73(6):1134-1142
pubmed: 27607021
Pest Manag Sci. 2001 Aug;57(8):663-75
pubmed: 11517719
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Sep;73(9):1908-1920
pubmed: 28233456
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 24;10(2):e0118139
pubmed: 25710560
J Environ Sci Health B. 2011;46(6):438-48
pubmed: 21726139
Pest Manag Sci. 2013 May;69(5):564-75
pubmed: 23456984
J Environ Sci Health B. 2011;46(1):1-23
pubmed: 20981606
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Sep;14(134):
pubmed: 28904005
Int J Pest Manag. 2016 Oct 1;62(4):348-359
pubmed: 27812241
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Apr 24;:
pubmed: 29688591
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;579:966-971
pubmed: 27887834
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(47):66613-66627
pubmed: 34235683
Nature. 2018 Sep;561(7721):109-112
pubmed: 30111837