Characteristics Associated With Treatment Failure 1 Year After Midurethral Sling in Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Exercise Therapy
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Pelvic Floor
/ physiopathology
Suburethral Slings
Treatment Failure
Urinary Incontinence
/ physiopathology
Urinary Incontinence, Stress
/ surgery
Urinary Incontinence, Urge
/ surgery
Urodynamics
/ physiology
Urologic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Journal
Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2021
01 08 2021
Historique:
received:
26
02
2021
accepted:
15
04
2021
pubmed:
9
7
2021
medline:
1
10
2021
entrez:
8
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate characteristics associated with treatment failure 1 year after midurethral sling in women with mixed urinary incontinence. Four-hundred three women who participated in a randomized trial that compared midurethral sling and behavioral and pelvic floor muscle therapy (combined group) compared with midurethral sling alone for mixed incontinence with 1-year follow-up data were eligible for this planned secondary analysis. Overall treatment failure was defined as meeting criteria for subjective or objective failure or both. Subjective failure was defined as not meeting the minimal clinical important difference for improvement on the UDI (Urogenital Distress Inventory) total score (26.1 points). Objective failure was defined as not achieving 70% improvement on mean incontinence episodes of any type per day or having undergone any additional treatment for persistent urinary symptoms at 12 months postoperative. Logistic regression models for treatment failure were constructed. Independent variables included site and treatment group, and clinical and demographic variables based on bivariate comparisons (P<.2). Treatment group interaction effects were evaluated. One hundred twelve of 379 (29.6%) women had overall treatment failure, with 56 of 379 (14.7%) undergoing additional treatment but only two needing intervention for stress incontinence. Previous overactive bladder (OAB) medication (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.19, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.96, 95% CI 1.17-3.31); detrusor overactivity on cystometrogram (OR 2.25, aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.60-4.97); and higher volume at first urge (OR 1.03, aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07) were associated with overall failure. Worse UDI-urgency scores were associated with failure, with an added interaction effect in the midurethral sling-alone group. Certain clinical and urodynamic variables are associated with treatment failure after midurethral sling in women with mixed urinary incontinence. Women with more severe urgency symptoms at baseline may benefit from perioperative behavioral and pelvic floor muscle therapy combined with midurethral sling. Overall, the need for additional urinary treatment was low and primarily for OAB. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01959347.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34237755
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004444
pii: 00006250-202108000-00006
pmc: PMC10184494
mid: NIHMS1890684
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01959347']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
199-207Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD041261
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD054215
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD054214
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U01 HD069031
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD041267
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD054241
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD069025
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD069010
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD069013
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD069006
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD069010
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD041267
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U10 HD054136
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial Disclosure Pamela Moalli received funding from Hologic for serving on the scientific advisory board. Diane K. Newman served on the Steering Committee and was Editor for UroToday Pelvic Health Center of Excellence. Alison C. Weidner was Consultant for Urocure and Dignify Therapeutics. Ariana Smith reports that her institution received funding from the NIDDK and the Pennsylvania Department of Health. Gena Dunivan received Research support from Pelvalon and Viveve. Beri Ridgeway was Consultant for Coloplast, Inc. Marie Gantz reports that money was paid to her institution from the NIDDK, NICHD, and NHLBI. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Minassian VA, Bazi T, Stewart WF. Clinical epidemiological insights into urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:687–96. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3314-7
doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3314-7
Dooley Y, Lowenstein L, Kenton K, FitzGerald M, Brubaker L. Mixed incontinence is more bothersome than pure incontinence subtypes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:1359–62. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0637-4
doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0637-4
Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, Ginsberg DA, Goldman HB, Gomelsky A, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 2017;198:875–83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.061
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.061
Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, et al. Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:213–40. doi: 10.1002/nau.20870
doi: 10.1002/nau.20870
Kammerer-Doak D, Rizk DE, Sorinola O, Agur W, Ismail S, Bazi T. Mixed urinary incontinence: international urogynecological association research and development committee opinion. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25:1303–12. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2485-8
doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2485-8
Sung VW, Borello-France D, Newman DK, Richter HE, Lukacz ES, Moalli P, et al. Effect of behavioral and pelvic floor muscle therapy combined with surgery vs surgery alone on incontinence symptoms Among women with mixed urinary incontinence: the ESTEEM randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019;322:1066–76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12467
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12467
Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2066–76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658
Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Vasavada S, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:611–21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162f22e
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162f22e
Sung VW, Borello-France D, Dunivan G, Gantz M, Lukacz ES, Moalli P, et al. Methods for a multicenter randomized trial for mixed urinary incontinence: rationale and patient-centeredness of the ESTEEM trial. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:1479–90. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3031-7
doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3031-7
Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1987–97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113595
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113595
Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) research group. Qual Life Res 1994;3:291–306. doi: 10.1007/BF00451721
doi: 10.1007/BF00451721
Coyne KS, Matza LS, Thompson CL, Kopp ZS, Khullar V. Determining the importance of change in the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire. J Urol 2006;176:627–32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.088
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.088
Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:98–101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379
doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379
Richter HE, Litman HJ, Lukacz ES, Sirls LT, Rickey L, Norton P, et al. Demographic and clinical predictors of treatment failure one year after midurethral sling surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:913–21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820f3892
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820f3892
Paick JS, Ku JH, Shin JW, Son H, Oh SJ, Kim SW. Tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence with low Valsalva leak point pressure. J Urol 2004;172:1370–3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000139882.57216.45
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000139882.57216.45
Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Ellerkmann M, Vasavada S, et al. Risk factors associated with failure 1 year after retropubic or transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:666–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.050
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.050