Technical Note: Volumetric computed tomography for radiotherapy simulation and treatment planning.
radiation treatment planning
radiotherapy simulation
volumetric computed tomography
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
revised:
07
04
2021
received:
23
01
2021
accepted:
29
05
2021
pubmed:
10
7
2021
medline:
18
8
2021
entrez:
9
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For lung and liver tumors requiring radiotherapy, motion artifacts are common in 4D-CT images due to the small axial field-of-view (aFOV) of conventional CT scanners. This may negatively impact contouring and dose calculation accuracy and could lead to a geographic miss during treatment. Recent advancements in volumetric CT (vCT) enable an aFOV up to 160 mm in a single rotation, which may reduce motion artifacts. However, the impact of large aFOV on CT number required for dose calculation needs to be evaluated before clinical implementation. The objective of this study was to determine the utility of a 256-slice vCT scanner for 4D-CT simulation by evaluating image quality and generating relative electron density (RED) curves. Images were acquired on a 256-slice GE Revolution CT scanner with 40 mm, 80 mm, 120 mm, 140 mm, and 160 mm aFOV. Image quality was assessed by evaluating CT number linearity, uniformity, noise, and low-contrast resolution. The relationship between each quality metric and aFOV was assessed. CT number linearity, uniformity, noise, and low-contrast resolution were within the expected range for each image set, except CT number in Teflon and Delrin, which were underestimated. Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) showed that the CT number for Teflon (ρ = 1.0, p = 0.02), Delrin (ρ = 1.0, p = 0.02), and air (ρ = 1.0, p = 0.02) was significantly related to aFOV, while all other measurements were not. The measured deviations from expected values were not clinically significant. These results suggest that vCT can be used for CT simulation for radiation treatment planning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34240548
doi: 10.1002/acm2.13336
pmc: PMC8364284
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
295-302Subventions
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Organisme : Lawson Health Research Institute
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):109-19
pubmed: 17185663
Med Phys. 2001 Sep;28(9):1850-6
pubmed: 11585216
Med Phys. 2016 Aug;43(8):4821
pubmed: 27487900
Med Phys. 2003 Oct;30(10):2762-92
pubmed: 14596315
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):164-170
pubmed: 31254457
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 15;72(4):1250-8
pubmed: 18823717
Med Phys. 2013 Feb;40(2):021904
pubmed: 23387752
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jul;148:229-234
pubmed: 32442870
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5120-7
pubmed: 19994522
Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):e735-e756
pubmed: 31408540
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 08;16(2):4972
pubmed: 26103172
Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):6431-42
pubmed: 23039678
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Aug;22(8):295-302
pubmed: 34240548
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Sep;21(9):178-186
pubmed: 32889789
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jan;21(1):11-17
pubmed: 31385421