Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines.
COVID-19
journalism (see medical journalism)
public health
world wide web technology
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 07 2021
08 07 2021
Historique:
entrez:
10
7
2021
pubmed:
11
7
2021
medline:
15
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Countries have major differences in the acceptance of face mask use for the prevention of COVID-19. This work aims at studying the information online in different countries in terms of information quality and content. Content analysis. We analysed 450 webpages returned by searching the string 'are face masks dangerous' in Italy, the UK and the USA using three search engines (Bing, Duckduckgo and Google) in August 2020. The type of website and the stance about masks were assessed by two raters for each language and inter-rater agreement reported as Cohen's kappa. The text of the webpages was collected from the web using WebBootCaT and analysed using a corpus analysis software to identify issues mentioned. Most pages were news outlets, and few (2%-6%) from public health agencies. Webpages with a negative stance on masks were more frequent in Italian (28%) than English (19%). Google returned the highest number of mask-positive pages and Duckduckgo the lowest. Google also returned the lowest number of pages mentioning conspiracy theories and Duckduckgo the highest. Webpages in Italian scored lower than those in English in transparency (reporting authors, their credentials and backing the information with references). When issues about the use of face masks were analysed, mask effectiveness was the most discussed followed by hypercapnia (accumulation of carbon dioxide), contraindication in respiratory disease and hypoxia, with issues related to their contraindications in mental health conditions and disability mentioned by very few pages. This study suggests that: (1) public health agencies should increase their web presence in providing correct information on face masks; (2) search engines should improve the information quality criteria in their ranking; (3) the public should be more informed on issues related to the use of masks and disabilities, mental health and stigma arising for those people who cannot wear masks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34244263
pii: bmjopen-2020-046364
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046364
pmc: PMC8275368
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e046364Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 5;7(4):e26780
pubmed: 33720841
Front Immunol. 2018 Jun 05;9:1215
pubmed: 29922286
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):6-14
pubmed: 33225745
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 19;17(18):
pubmed: 32961702
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106263
pubmed: 33017601
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 11;7:400
pubmed: 32850905
JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1244-5
pubmed: 9103351
Front Immunol. 2015 Dec 08;6:616
pubmed: 26697012
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1881-7
pubmed: 22857909
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7828):186-189
pubmed: 33024333
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):371-374
pubmed: 32461658
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):21851-21853
pubmed: 32820078
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Dec;8:100119
pubmed: 34173443
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Sep 3;16:76
pubmed: 32905318
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Oct 14;7(10):201199
pubmed: 33204475
Nature. 2020 Apr 27;:
pubmed: 32341556
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Apr;174(4):511-520
pubmed: 33370173
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 20;9(2):e89177
pubmed: 24586574
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):663-673
pubmed: 32592420
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 1;6(2):e18717
pubmed: 32217507
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 13;8:606635
pubmed: 33520918
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 25;6:165
pubmed: 31403046
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987
pubmed: 32497510
Vaccine. 2012 May 28;30(25):3778-89
pubmed: 22172504