Reinstatement of synaptic plasticity in the aging brain through specific dopamine transporter inhibition.


Journal

Molecular psychiatry
ISSN: 1476-5578
Titre abrégé: Mol Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607835

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 11 7 2021
medline: 15 3 2022
entrez: 10 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Aging-related neurological deficits negatively impact mental health, productivity, and social interactions leading to a pronounced socioeconomic burden. Since declining brain dopamine signaling during aging is associated with the onset of neurological impairments, we produced a selective dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitor to restore endogenous dopamine levels and improve cognitive function. We describe the synthesis and pharmacological profile of (S,S)-CE-158, a highly specific DAT inhibitor, which increases dopamine levels in brain regions associated with cognition. We find both a potentiation of neurotransmission and coincident restoration of dendritic spines in the dorsal hippocampus, indicative of reinstatement of dopamine-induced synaptic plasticity in aging rodents. Treatment with (S,S)-CE-158 significantly improved behavioral flexibility in scopolamine-compromised animals and increased the number of spontaneously active prefrontal cortical neurons, both in young and aging rodents. In addition, (S,S)-CE-158 restored learning and memory recall in aging rats comparable to their young performance in a hippocampus-dependent hole board test. In sum, we present a well-tolerated, highly selective DAT inhibitor that normalizes the age-related decline in cognitive function at a synaptic level through increased dopamine signaling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34244620
doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01214-x
pii: 10.1038/s41380-021-01214-x
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins 0

Types de publication

News Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7076-7090

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA. Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research, and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 2007;55:780–91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01156.x
Chiu CJ, Cheng YY. Utility of geriatric syndrome indicators for predicting subsequent health care utilization in older adults in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2019;16:456.
Murman DL. The impact of age on cognition. Semin Hearing. 2015;36:111–21.
doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555115
Kaasinen V, Rinne JO. Functional imaging studies of dopamine system and cognition in normal aging and Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:785–93.
pubmed: 12470690 doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00065-9
Dillman AA, Majounie E, Ding J, Gibbs JR, Hernandez D, Arepalli S, et al. Transcriptomic profiling of the human brain reveals that altered synaptic gene expression is associated with chronological aging. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16890.
pubmed: 29203886 pmcid: 5715102 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17322-0
Karrer TM, Josef AK, Mata R, Morris ED, Samanez-Larkin GR. Reduced dopamine receptors and transporters but not synthesis capacity in normal aging adults: a meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;57:36–46.
pubmed: 28599217 pmcid: 5645072 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.05.006
Hamilton TJ, Wheatley BM, Sinclair DB, Bachmann M, Larkum ME, Colmers WF. Dopamine modulates synaptic plasticity in dendrites of rat and human dentate granule cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:18185–90.
pubmed: 20921404 pmcid: 2964233 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011558107
Chowdhury R, Guitart-Masip M, Lambert C, Dayan P, Huys Q, Duzel E, et al. Dopamine restores reward prediction errors in old age. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:648–53.
pubmed: 23525044 pmcid: 3672991 doi: 10.1038/nn.3364
Neve KA, Seamans JK, Trantham-Davidson H. Dopamine receptor signaling. J Receptor Signal Transduct Res. 2004;24:165–205.
doi: 10.1081/RRS-200029981
Eagle DM, Wong JC, Allan ME, Mar AC, Theobald DE, Robbins TW. Contrasting roles for dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in the dorsomedial striatum but not the nucleus accumbens core during behavioral inhibition in the stop-signal task in rats. J Neurosci. 2011;31:7349–56.
pubmed: 21593319 pmcid: 3173842 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6182-10.2011
Nikiforuk A, Kalaba P, Ilic M, Korz V, Dragacevic V, Wackerlig J, et al. A novel dopamine transporter inhibitor CE-123 improves cognitive flexibility and maintains impulsivity in healthy male rats. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11:222.
pubmed: 29230168 pmcid: 5711856 doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00222
Gerrard P, Malcolm R. Mechanisms of modafinil: a review of current research. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2007;3:349–64.
pubmed: 19300566 pmcid: 2654794
Krushkal J, Xiong M, Ferrell R, Sing CF, Turner ST, Boerwinkle E. Linkage and association of adrenergic and dopamine receptor genes in the distal portion of the long arm of chromosome 5 with systolic blood pressure variation. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:1379–83.
pubmed: 9700190 doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.9.1379
Bisagno V, Gonzalez B, Urbano FJ. Cognitive enhancers versus addictive psychostimulants: The good and bad side of dopamine on prefrontal cortical circuits. Pharmacol Res. 2016;109:108–18.
pubmed: 26826399 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.01.013
Kalaba P, Aher NY, Ilic M, Dragacevic V, Wieder M, Miklosi AG, et al. Heterocyclic analogues of modafinil as novel, atypical dopamine transporter inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2017;60:9330–48.
pubmed: 29091428 doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01313
Kalaba P, Ilic M, Aher NY, Dragacevic V, Wieder M, Zehl M, et al. Structure-activity relationships of novel thiazole-based modafinil analogues acting at monoamine transporters. J Med Chem. 2020;63:391–417.
pubmed: 31841637 doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01938
Sagheddu C, Pintori N, Kalaba P, Dragacevic V, Piras G, Lubec J, et al. Neurophysiological and neurochemical effects of the putative cognitive enhancer (S)-CE-123 on mesocorticolimbic dopamine system. Biomolecules. 2020;10:779.
Underhill SM, Hullihen PD, Chen J, Fenollar-Ferrer C, Rizzo MA, Ingram SL, et al. Amphetamines signal through intracellular TAAR1 receptors coupled to Galpha13 and GalphaS in discrete subcellular domains. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:1208–23.
Harraz MM, Malla AP, Semenza ER, Shishikura M, Hwang Y, Kang IG, et al. Cocaine receptor identified as BASP1. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.23.392787v1 . 2020.
Scheller KJ, Williams SJ, Lawrence AJ, Jarrott B, Djouma E. An improved method to prepare an injectable microemulsion of the galanin-receptor 3 selective antagonist, SNAP 37889, using Kolliphor((R)) HS 15. MethodsX. 2014;1:212–216.
pubmed: 26150955 pmcid: 4472996 doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2014.09.003
Camats-Perna J, Kalaba P, Ebner K, Sartori SB, Vuyyuru H, Aher NY, et al. Differential effects of novel dopamine reuptake inhibitors on interference with long-term social memory in mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13:63.
pubmed: 31031603 pmcid: 6470289 doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00063
Kahn I, Shohamy D. Intrinsic connectivity between the hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, and ventral tegmental area in humans. Hippocampus. 2013;23:187–92.
pubmed: 23129267 doi: 10.1002/hipo.22077
Bromberg-Martin ES, Matsumoto M, Hikosaka O. Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron. 2010;68:815–34.
pubmed: 21144997 pmcid: 3032992 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.022
Kempadoo KA, Mosharov EV, Choi SJ, Sulzer D, Kandel ER. Dopamine release from the locus coeruleus to the dorsal hippocampus promotes spatial learning and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:14835–40.
pubmed: 27930324 pmcid: 5187750 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616515114
Takeuchi T, Duszkiewicz AJ, Sonneborn A, Spooner PA, Yamasaki M, Watanabe M, et al. Locus coeruleus and dopaminergic consolidation of everyday memory. Nature. 2016;537:357–62.
pubmed: 27602521 pmcid: 5161591 doi: 10.1038/nature19325
Tritsch NX, Sabatini BL. Dopaminergic modulation of synaptic transmission in cortex and striatum. Neuron. 2012;76:33–50.
pubmed: 23040805 pmcid: 4386589 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.023
Lubec J, Smidak R, Malikovic J, Feyissa DD, Korz V, Hoger H, et al. Dentate gyrus peroxiredoxin 6 levels discriminate aged unimpaired from impaired rats in a spatial memory task. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:198.
pubmed: 31417400 pmcid: 6684764 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00198
Rao Y, Liu ZW, Borok E, Rabenstein RL, Shanabrough M, Lu M, et al. Prolonged wakefulness induces experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in mouse hypocretin/orexin neurons. J Clin Investig. 2007;117:4022–33.
pubmed: 18060037 pmcid: 2104495 doi: 10.1172/JCI32829
Citri A, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity: multiple forms, functions, and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:18–41.
pubmed: 17728696 doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301559
Luscher C, Malenka RC. Drug-evoked synaptic plasticity in addiction: from molecular changes to circuit remodeling. Neuron. 2011;69:650–63.
pubmed: 21338877 pmcid: 4046255 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.017
Creed MC, Luscher C. Drug-evoked synaptic plasticity: beyond metaplasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:553–558.
pubmed: 23571119 doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.03.005
Jones SR, Gainetdinov RR, Jaber M, Giros B, Wightman RM, Caron MG. Profound neuronal plasticity in response to inactivation of the dopamine transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:4029–34.
pubmed: 9520487 pmcid: 19957 doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.4029
Ferreras S, Fernandez G, Danelon V, Pisano MV, Masseroni L, Chapleau CA, et al. Cdk5 is essential for amphetamine to increase dendritic spine density in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:372.
pubmed: 29225566 pmcid: 5705944 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00372
Ka M, Kook YH, Liao K, Buch S, Kim WY. Transactivation of TrkB by Sigma-1 receptor mediates cocaine-induced changes in dendritic spine density and morphology in hippocampal and cortical neurons. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2414.
pubmed: 27735948 pmcid: 5133986 doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.319
Gipson CD, Kupchik YM, Shen H, Reissner KJ, Thomas CA, Kalivas PW. Relapse induced by cues predicting cocaine depends on rapid, transient synaptic potentiation. Neuron. 2013;77:867–72.
pubmed: 23473317 pmcid: 3619421 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.005
Dickstein DL, Weaver CM, Luebke JI, Hof PR. Dendritic spine changes associated with normal aging. Neuroscience. 2013;251:21–32.
pubmed: 23069756 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.077
Kim BG, Dai HN, McAtee M, Vicini S, Bregman BS. Labeling of dendritic spines with the carbocyanine dye DiI for confocal microscopic imaging in lightly fixed cortical slices. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;162:237–43.
pubmed: 17346799 pmcid: 2692721 doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.01.016
Bahar AS, Shirvalkar PR, Shapiro ML. Memory-guided learning: CA1 and CA3 neuronal ensembles differentially encode the commonalities and differences between situations. J Neurosci. 2011;31:12270–81.
pubmed: 21865470 pmcid: 3167378 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1671-11.2011
Rubin RD, Watson PD, Duff MC, Cohen NJ. The role of the hippocampus in flexible cognition and social behavior. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:742.
pubmed: 25324753 pmcid: 4179699 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00742
Mahmmoud RR, Sase S, Aher YD, Sase A, Groger M, Mokhtar M, et al. Spatial and working memory is linked to spine density and mushroom spines. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139739.
pubmed: 26469788 pmcid: 4607435 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139739
Peters A, Kaiserman-Abramof IR. The small pyramidal neuron of the rat cerebral cortex. The perikaryon, dendrites and spines. Am J Anat. 1970;127:321–55.
pubmed: 4985058 doi: 10.1002/aja.1001270402
Bourne J, Harris KM. Do thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17:381–386.
pubmed: 17498943 doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.04.009
Harris KM, Jensen FE, Tsao B. Three-dimensional structure of dendritic spines and synapses in rat hippocampus (CA1) at postnatal day 15 and adult ages: implications for the maturation of synaptic physiology and long-term potentiation. J Neurosci. 1992;12:2685–705.
pubmed: 1613552 pmcid: 6575840 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-07-02685.1992
Birrell JM, Brown VJ. Medial frontal cortex mediates perceptual attentional set shifting in the rat. J Neurosci. 2000;20:4320–4324.
pubmed: 10818167 pmcid: 6772641 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04320.2000
van der Staay FJ, van Nies J, Raaijmakers W. The effects of aging in rats on working and reference memory performance in a spatial holeboard discrimination task. Behav neural Biol. 1990;53:356–70.
pubmed: 2350322 doi: 10.1016/0163-1047(90)90226-V
Barrash J. Age‐related decline in route learning ability. Developmental Neuropsychol. 1994;10:189–201.
doi: 10.1080/87565649409540578
Backman L, Lindenberger U, Li SC, Nyberg L. Linking cognitive aging to alterations in dopamine neurotransmitter functioning: recent data and future avenues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34:670–7.
pubmed: 20026186 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.008
Rosenberg PB, Lanctot KL, Drye LT, Herrmann N, Scherer RW, Bachman DL, et al. Safety and efficacy of methylphenidate for apathy in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74:810–6.
pubmed: 24021498 pmcid: 3902018 doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08099
Auriel E, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. Methylphenidate for the treatment of Parkinson disease and other neurological disorders. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2009;32:75–81.
pubmed: 18978488 doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e318170576c
Sassi KLM, Rocha NP, Colpo GD, John V, Teixeira AL. Amphetamine Use in the Elderly: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18:126–35.
pubmed: 31660835 pmcid: 7324882 doi: 10.2174/1570159X17666191010093021
Reece AS, Norman A, Hulse GK. Acceleration of cardiovascular-biological age by amphetamine exposure is a power function of chronological age. Heart Asia. 2017;9:30–8.
pubmed: 28243315 pmcid: 5307374 doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2016-010832
Schmitt KC, Rothman RB, Reith ME. Nonclassical pharmacology of the dopamine transporter: atypical inhibitors, allosteric modulators, and partial substrates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;346:2–10.
pubmed: 23568856 pmcid: 3684841 doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.191056
Minzenberg MJ, Carter CS. Modafinil: a review of neurochemical actions and effects on cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:1477–502.
pubmed: 17712350 doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301534
Keighron JD, Quarterman JC, Cao J, DeMarco EM, Coggiano MA, Gleaves A, et al. Effects of (R)-modafinil and modafinil analogues on dopamine dynamics assessed by voltammetry and microdialysis in the mouse nucleus accumbens shell. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10:2012–21.
pubmed: 30645944 doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00340
Desai RI, Kopajtic TA, Koffarnus M, Newman AH, Katz JL. Identification of a dopamine transporter ligand that blocks the stimulant effects of cocaine. J Neurosci. 2005;25:1889–93.
pubmed: 15728828 pmcid: 6726049 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4778-04.2005
Tanda G, Newman AH, Ebbs AL, Tronci V, Green JL, Tallarida RJ, et al. Combinations of cocaine with other dopamine uptake inhibitors: assessment of additivity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;330:802–9.
pubmed: 19483071 pmcid: 2729796 doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.154302
Rush CR, Kelly TH, Hays LR, Baker RW, Wooten AF. Acute behavioral and physiological effects of modafinil in drug abusers. Behav Pharmacol. 2002;13:105–15.
pubmed: 11981223 doi: 10.1097/00008877-200203000-00002
Kampman KM, Lynch KG, Pettinati HM, Spratt K, Wierzbicki MR, Dackis C, et al. A double blind, placebo controlled trial of modafinil for the treatment of cocaine dependence without co-morbid alcohol dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;155:105–10.
pubmed: 26320827 pmcid: 4582003 doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.005
Zhang HY, Bi GH, Yang HJ, He Y, Xue G, Cao J, et al. The novel modafinil analog, JJC8-016, as a potential cocaine abuse pharmacotherapeutic. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42:1871–83.
pubmed: 28266501 pmcid: 5564383 doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.41
Anderson AL, Li SH, Biswas K, McSherry F, Holmes T, Iturriaga E, et al. Modafinil for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;120:135–41.
pubmed: 21840138 doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.07.007
Villeda SA, Plambeck KE, Middeldorp J, Castellano JM, Mosher KI, Luo J, et al. Young blood reverses age-related impairments in cognitive function and synaptic plasticity in mice. Nat Med. 2014;20:659–63.
pubmed: 24793238 pmcid: 4224436 doi: 10.1038/nm.3569
Rotolo RA, Kalaba P, Dragacevic V, Presby RE, Neri J, Robertson E, et al. Behavioral and dopamine transporter binding properties of the modafinil analog (S, S)-CE-158: reversal of the motivational effects of tetrabenazine and enhancement of progressive ratio responding. Psychopharmacology. 2020;237:3459–70.
pubmed: 32770257 pmcid: 7572767 doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05625-6
Rotolo RA, Dragacevic V, Kalaba P, Urban E, Zehl M, Roller A, et al. The novel atypical dopamine uptake inhibitor (S)-CE-123 partially reverses the effort-related effects of the dopamine depleting agent tetrabenazine and increases progressive ratio responding. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:682.
pubmed: 31316379 pmcid: 6611521 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00682
Goetghebeur P, Dias R. Comparison of haloperidol, risperidone, sertindole, and modafinil to reverse an attentional set-shifting impairment following subchronic PCP administration in the rat–a back translational study. Psychopharmacology. 2009;202:287–93.
pubmed: 18392753 doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1132-9
Ilic M, Holy M, Jaentsch K, Liechti ME, Lubec G, Baumann MH, et al. Cell-based radiotracer binding and uptake inhibition assays: a comparison of in vitro methods to assess the potency of drugs that target monoamine transporters. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:673.
pubmed: 32508638 pmcid: 7248194 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00673
Niello M, Gradisch R, Loland CJ, Stockner T, Sitte HH. Allosteric modulation of neurotransmitter transporters as a therapeutic strategy. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020;41:446–63.
pubmed: 32471654 pmcid: 7610661 doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.04.006
Pifl C, Reither H, Hornykiewicz O. The profile of mephedrone on human monoamine transporters differs from 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine primarily by lower potency at the vesicular monoamine transporter. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;755:119–26.
pubmed: 25771452 doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.004
Au-Young SM, Shen H, Yang CR. Medial prefrontal cortical output neurons to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and their responses to burst-patterned stimulation of the VTA: neuroanatomical and in vivo electrophysiological analyses. Synapse. 1999;34:245–55.
pubmed: 10529719 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(19991215)34:4<245::AID-SYN1>3.0.CO;2-D
Connors BW, Gutnick MJ. Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:99–104.
pubmed: 1691879 doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90185-D
Secci ME, Mascia P, Sagheddu C, Beggiato S, Melis M, Borelli AC, et al. Astrocytic mechanisms involving kynurenic acid control delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced increases in glutamate release in brain reward-processing areas. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56:3563–75.
pubmed: 30151725 doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1319-y
Stojanovic T, Benes H, Awad A, Bormann D, Monje FJ. Nicotine abolishes memory-related synaptic strengthening and promotes synaptic depression in the neurogenic dentate gyrus of miR-132/212 knockout mice. Addict Biol. 2020;26:e12905.
Nguyen PV, Kandel ER. Brief theta-burst stimulation induces a transcription-dependent late phase of LTP requiring cAMP in area CA1 of the mouse hippocampus. Learn Mem. 1997;4:230–43.
pubmed: 10456066 doi: 10.1101/lm.4.2.230
Nguyen PV, Abel T, Kandel ER. Requirement of a critical period of transcription for induction of a late phase of LTP. Science. 1994;265:1104–1107.
pubmed: 8066450 doi: 10.1126/science.8066450
Young JW, Powell SB, Geyer MA, Jeste DV, Risbrough VB. The mouse attentional-set-shifting task: a method for assaying successful cognitive aging? Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010;10:243–51.
pubmed: 20498348 pmcid: 2877277 doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.2.243
Feyissa DD, Aher YD, Engidawork E, Hoger H, Lubec G, Korz V. Individual differences in male rats in a behavioral test battery: a multivariate statistical approach. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11:26.
pubmed: 28261069 pmcid: 5314104 doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00026
Kristofova M, Aher YD, Ilic M, Radoman B, Kalaba P, Dragacevic V, et al. A daily single dose of a novel modafinil analogue CE-123 improves memory acquisition and memory retrieval. Behav Brain Res. 2018;343:83–94.
pubmed: 29410048 doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.01.032

Auteurs

Jana Lubec (J)

Programme for Proteomics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Predrag Kalaba (P)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Ahmed M Hussein (AM)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Zoology, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.

Daniel Daba Feyissa (DD)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Mohamed H Kotob (MH)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Rasha R Mahmmoud (RR)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt.

Oliver Wieder (O)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Arthur Garon (A)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Claudia Sagheddu (C)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.

Marija Ilic (M)

Programme for Proteomics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Institute of Pharmacology, Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Vladimir Dragačević (V)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Anita Cybulska-Klosowicz (A)

Laboratory of Neuroplasticity, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.

Martin Zehl (M)

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Judith Wackerlig (J)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Simone B Sartori (SB)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), Leopold Franzens University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Karl Ebner (K)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), Leopold Franzens University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Shima Kouhnavardi (S)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Alexander Roller (A)

X-ray Structure Analysis Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Natalie Gajic (N)

X-ray Structure Analysis Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Marco Pistis (M)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Neuroscience and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy.
Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Section of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Nicolas Singewald (N)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), Leopold Franzens University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Johann Jakob Leban (JJ)

Programme for Proteomics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Volker Korz (V)

Programme for Proteomics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Jovana Malikovic (J)

Programme for Proteomics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Roberto Plasenzotti (R)

Division of Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Harald H Sitte (HH)

Institute of Pharmacology, Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Francisco J Monje (FJ)

Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Neurophysiology and Neuropharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Thierry Langer (T)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Ernst Urban (E)

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Christian Pifl (C)

Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Gert Lubec (G)

Programme for Proteomics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. gert.lubec@lubeclab.com.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH