Healthcare provider satisfaction with environmental conditions in rural healthcare facilities of 14 low- and middle-income countries.

And hygiene (WaSH) Environmental health Health worker Infection prevention and control (IPC) Job satisfaction Sanitation Water healthcare facilities

Journal

International journal of hygiene and environmental health
ISSN: 1618-131X
Titre abrégé: Int J Hyg Environ Health
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100898843

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
received: 13 03 2021
revised: 23 06 2021
accepted: 29 06 2021
pubmed: 11 7 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 10 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Healthcare provider (HCP) satisfaction is important for staff retention and effective health service delivery. Inadequate resources, understaffing, and ineffective organizational structure may reduce HCP satisfaction in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Some qualitative studies have described links between environmental conditions and job satisfaction in HCPs; however, few studies have explored this link using survey data. This study explores associations between HCP satisfaction and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) infrastructure, cleanliness, and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in rural healthcare facilities (HCFs) in LMICs. This study analyzes 2002 HCFs in rural areas of 14 LMICs. Generalized linear mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between HCP satisfaction, WaSH infrastructure, and cleanliness and IPC practices. Most respondents reported that they were unsatisfied with water (65%), sanitation (68%), and hygiene infrastructure (54%) at their HCF. Insufficient supply and poor quality of WaSH resources were the most commonly reported reasons for provider dissatisfaction. Respondents were less likely to report dissatisfaction with cleanliness and IPC practices (36%). Dissatisfaction with cleanliness and IPC were most reported because patients and staff did not wash their hands at the correct times or with proper materials, or because the facility was not clean. Several characteristics of the WaSH environment were significantly associated with provider satisfaction at their HCFs, including acceptable water quality, readily available supply of water (on premises and improved), accessible supply of WaSH infrastructure to people with reduced mobility, accessible supplies of sanitation and hygiene materials, and sufficient training and budgeting for WaSH or IPC needs. Our results suggest that the provision of on premises, improved water service accessible to people with reduced mobility, interventions that prioritize the acceptability of sanitation facilities within the local context, and the provision of hygienic materials are key interventions to improve HCP satisfaction. Dedicated funding and oversight should be established at the HCF level to ensure access to consumable hygiene and IPC products and maintenance of WASH infrastructure. Improvements to WaSH in HCF may improve HCP satisfaction and ultimately patient outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34246055
pii: S1438-4639(21)00117-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113802
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

113802

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Donald Fejfar (D)

The Water Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States; Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.

Amy Guo (A)

The Water Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.

Emma Kelly (E)

The Water Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States; IMPACT, 9 Chemin de Balexrt, 1219 Geneva, Switzerland.

James Benjamin Tidwell (JB)

World Vision International, 300 I St NE, Washington, DC 20002, USA.

Oscar Ochieng (O)

World Vision International, 300 I St NE, Washington, DC 20002, USA.

Ryan Cronk (R)

The Water Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States; ICF, 2635 Meridian Pkwy Suite 200, Durham, NC 27713, United States. Electronic address: rcronk@alumni.unc.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH