Systematic review on potential brain dead donor estimations and conversion rates to actually realized organ donations.
Deceased organ donation
Detection of potential organ donors
Organ donation rates
Organ donations per million population
Transplants per million population
Waiting list for transplantation
Journal
Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.)
ISSN: 1557-9816
Titre abrégé: Transplant Rev (Orlando)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8804364
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
26
02
2021
revised:
29
06
2021
accepted:
29
06
2021
pubmed:
11
7
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
10
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate estimations of potential organ donors (POTDs) are required to improve transplant systems. This systematic review analyses current studies on national estimations of potential donors for transplantation as well as the practical and policy implications of detected differences. A systematic review of literature published between 01.01.2010 and 01.04.2020 in PubMed was conducted. Data was extracted into a self-developed matrix, and further data retrieved on national population sizes, waiting lists and transplant activities. Six studies were included. Investigated populations, underlying data collections and eligibility criteria for POTDs varied widely. Estimated POTDs per million population (p.m.p.) ranged from 25.8 to 333.6, conversion rates from 3.2% to 47.5% leading to 41.2 to 86.4 transplanted organs p.m.p.. Patients on the waiting lists varied from 66.7 to 338.9 p.m.p., defining gaps between organ supply and demand in countries. Not all studies adhered to the definitions and processes of the critical pathway for deceased donation which is the latest international consensus statement on deceased organ donation. Differences in estimated POTDs and differences in supply and demand of donor organs between countries cannot be satisfactorily explained yet due to an obvious lack of evidence, consistent methodology, international consensus and robust underlying datasets. Future studies should be based on robust underlying data sets and aim for potential donor estimations that allow national comparisons due to the adherence to the international consensus on definitions, processes and methodology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34246111
pii: S0955-470X(21)00044-6
doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100638
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100638Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.