Oocyte accumulation for fertility preservation in women with benign ovarian tumours with a history of previous surgery, multiple or large cysts.
Adult
Cohort Studies
Cryopreservation
/ methods
Cystadenoma, Mucinous
/ complications
Cystadenoma, Serous
/ complications
Endometriosis
/ complications
Female
Fertility Preservation
/ methods
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
/ rehabilitation
Humans
Oocyte Retrieval
/ methods
Ovarian Cysts
/ complications
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ complications
Ovarian Reserve
/ physiology
Ovary
/ surgery
Ovulation Induction
/ methods
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Teratoma
/ complications
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Benign ovarian tumors
Endometriomas
Fertility preservation
Oocyte vitrification
Journal
Reproductive biomedicine online
ISSN: 1472-6491
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biomed Online
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101122473
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
30
11
2020
revised:
23
04
2021
accepted:
27
04
2021
pubmed:
13
7
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
12
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
What are ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes and acceptance rates of an oocyte accumulation programme in young women with benign ovarian tumour (BOT)? Retrospective cohort study conducted at the Academic Assisted Reproductive Technology and Fertility Preservation Centre, Lille University Hospital, between January 2016 and December 2019. The number of metaphase II oocytes per cycle and per patient after accumulation were evaluated. Two groups were identified for the analysis: endometrioma ('endometrioma') and dermoid, mucinous or serous cyst ('other cysts'). A total of 113 fertility-preservation cycles were analysed in 70 women aged 27.9 ± 4.8 years. Almost all women had undergone previous ovarian surgery before fertility preservation (89%). Mean anti-Müllerian hormone levels before ovarian stimulation was 12.5 ± 8.7 pmol/l. A total of 6.4 ± 3.4 oocytes were retrieved, and 4.3 ± 3.4 metaphase II (MII) oocytes were vitrified per cycle. All agreed to the oocyte accumulation programme and all underwent at least one cycle. To date, 36 (51%) patients achieved two or three fertility- preservation cycles. After accumulation, 7.0 ± 5.23 MII oocytes were vitrified per patient. No difference was found in ovarian response and oocyte cohort between the 'endometrioma' and 'other cysts' groups. Questionnaires completed after oocyte retrieval revealed abdominal bloating and pelvic pain in most patients, with no difference according to the type of cyst. No serious adverse events occurred. Oocyte accumulation should be systematically offered to young women with BOT irrespective of histological type, as it seems to be well-tolerated. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the efficiency of oocyte accumulation to optimize the chances of subsequent pregnancies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34247989
pii: S1472-6483(21)00196-6
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.04.020
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
205-214Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.