Attitudes Toward Four Levels of Self-Driving Technology Among Elderly Drivers.
SAE levels
attitudes
autonomous vehicle
elderly drivers
preferences
sustainable transportation
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
19
03
2021
accepted:
27
05
2021
entrez:
12
7
2021
pubmed:
13
7
2021
medline:
13
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Automatization and autonomous vehicles can drastically improve elderly drivers' safety and mobility, with lower costs to the driver and the environment. While autonomous vehicle technology is developing rapidly, much less attention and resources have been devoted to understanding the acceptance, attitudes, and preferences of vehicle automatization among driver groups, such as the elderly. In this study, 236 elderly drivers (≥65 years) evaluated four vehicles representing SAE levels 2-5 in terms of safety, trustworthiness, enjoyment, reliability, comfort, ease of use, and attractiveness, as well as reporting preferences for vehicles employing each of the four levels of automation. The results of a repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the elderly drivers rated the SAE level 2 vehicle highest and the fully automated vehicle (SAE 5) lowest across all attributes. The preference for the vehicle declined as a function of increasing automatization. The seven attributes formed an internally coherent "attitude to automatization" scale, a strong correlate of vehicle preference. Age or annual mileage were not related to attitudes or preferences for automated vehicles. The current study shows that elderly drivers' attitudes toward automatization should be studied further, and these results should be taken into account when developing automated vehicles. The full potential of automatization may not be realized if elderly drivers are ignored.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34248785
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682973
pmc: PMC8261150
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
682973Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Lajunen and Sullman.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2019 Apr;39(2):97-107
pubmed: 30791814
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016 Jun;31(4):351-60
pubmed: 26655744
Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 Nov 16;4(4):
pubmed: 31744041
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1018-24
pubmed: 20441808
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 Sep;63(5):S298-303
pubmed: 18818450
Occup Ther Health Care. 2014 Jul;28(3):264-76
pubmed: 24971894
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:193-199
pubmed: 31847995
Ergonomics. 2004 Nov;47(14):1561-70
pubmed: 15697070
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Feb;64(2):332-41
pubmed: 26780879
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S176-S179
pubmed: 31674855
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):490-500
pubmed: 31343185
Gerontologist. 2014 Jun;54(3):423-33
pubmed: 23651920
Innov Aging. 2020 Jun 18;4(3):igaa017
pubmed: 32582868