Mapping and Preserving the Visuospatial Network by repetitive nTMS and DTI Tractography in Patients With Right Parietal Lobe Tumors.
Hooper visual organization test
brain tumors
diffusion tensor imaging tractography
navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS)
parietal lobe
superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF)
visuospatial abilities
visuospatial network
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
07
03
2021
accepted:
17
05
2021
entrez:
12
7
2021
pubmed:
13
7
2021
medline:
13
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The goal of brain tumor surgery is the maximal resection of neoplastic tissue, while preserving the adjacent functional brain tissues. The identification of functional networks involved in complex brain functions, including visuospatial abilities (VSAs), is usually difficult. We report our preliminary experience using a preoperative planning based on the combination of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) and DTI tractography to provide the preoperative 3D reconstruction of the visuospatial (VS) cortico-subcortical network in patients with right parietal lobe tumors. Patients affected by right parietal lobe tumors underwent mapping of both hemispheres using an nTMS-implemented version of the Hooper Visual Organization Test (HVOT) to identify cortical areas involved in the VS network. DTI tractography was used to compute the subcortical component of the network, consisting of the three branches of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). The 3D reconstruction of the VS network was used to plan and guide the safest surgical approach to resect the tumor and avoid damage to the network. We retrospectively analyzed the cortical distribution of nTMS-induced errors, and assessed the impact of the planning on surgery by analyzing the extent of tumor resection (EOR) and the occurrence of postoperative VSAs deficits in comparison with a matched historical control group of patients operated without using the nTMS-based preoperative reconstruction of the VS network. Twenty patients were enrolled in the study (Group A). The error rate (ER) induced by nTMS was higher in the right vs. the left hemisphere (p=0.02). In the right hemisphere, the ER was higher in the anterior supramarginal gyrus (aSMG) (1.7%), angular gyrus (1.4%) superior parietal lobule (SPL) (1.3%), and dorsal lateral occipital gyrus (dLoG) (1.2%). The reconstruction of the cortico-subcortical VS network was successfully used to plan and guide tumor resection. A gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 85% of cases. After surgery no new VSAs deficits were observed and a slightly significant improvement of the HVOT score (p=0.02) was documented. The historical control group (Group B) included 20 patients matched for main clinical characteristics with patients in Group A, operated without the support of the nTMS-based planning. A GTR was achieved in 90% of cases, but the postoperative HVOT score resulted to be worsened as compared to the preoperative period (p=0.03). The comparison between groups showed a significantly improved postoperative HVOT score in Group A vs. Group B (p=0.03). The nTMS-implemented HVOT is a feasible approach to map cortical areas involved in VSAs. It can be combined with DTI tractography, thus providing a reconstruction of the VS network that could guide neurosurgeons to preserve the VS network during tumor resection, thus reducing the occurrence of postoperative VSAs deficits as compared to standard asleep surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34249716
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.677172
pmc: PMC8268025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
677172Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Raffa, Quattropani, Marzano, Curcio, Rizzo, Sebestyén, Tamás, Büki and Germanò.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Neurosurgery. 2007 Dec;61(6):E1340
pubmed: 18162882
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 03;9(7):e101805
pubmed: 24992634
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Feb;28(2):E6
pubmed: 20121441
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):523-8; discussion 528-9
pubmed: 20173547
Neurosurgery. 2005;56(1):130-7; discussion 138
pubmed: 15617595
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117(6):1032-8
pubmed: 23039151
Neurosurg Rev. 2013 Jan;36(1):123-31; discussion 132
pubmed: 22777660
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Feb;25(2):287-301
pubmed: 21331981
Neurosurgery. 2021 Apr 15;88(5):919-930
pubmed: 33463689
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 04;9(4):e93767
pubmed: 24705681
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 Sep;9(5):491-500
pubmed: 23116076
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 Nov;10(7):939-47
pubmed: 15803557
Cortex. 2015 Feb;63:27-41
pubmed: 25241396
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Feb;28(2):E1
pubmed: 20121436
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Oct;16(10):1365-72
pubmed: 24923875
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 May;24(5):937-41
pubmed: 12748097
Surg Neurol. 2009 Nov;72(5):464-9; discussion 469
pubmed: 19608227
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 30;10(4):e0125298
pubmed: 25928744
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 Jan;20(1):123-8
pubmed: 15620818
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Dec 1;47(6):E10
pubmed: 31786549
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 May;180:7-17
pubmed: 30870762
Appl Neuropsychol. 2007;14(4):275-83
pubmed: 18067424
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Mar;24(3):691-706
pubmed: 23162045
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1193-200
pubmed: 18711393
Percept Mot Skills. 2005 Jun;100(3 Pt 1):695-702
pubmed: 16060429
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000 Apr;10(2):232-7
pubmed: 10753803
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E18
pubmed: 27476842
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:81-97
pubmed: 28081452
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jan 23;11:4
pubmed: 28167906
Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Dec;14(6):2817-2830
pubmed: 31468374
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jul;61(1 Suppl):279-304; discussion 304-5
pubmed: 18813160
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Feb;28(2):Intro
pubmed: 20121445
Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(3):696-704; discussion 704-5
pubmed: 21471830
J Neurosurg Sci. 2019 Dec;63(6):670-678
pubmed: 31079439
Neurosurgery. 1996 Apr;38(4):678-84; discussion 684-5
pubmed: 8692384
Clin Neurosurg. 1994;41:444-63
pubmed: 7842620
Neurol Res. 2018 Apr;40(4):241-248
pubmed: 29380683
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:538-549
pubmed: 28427971
BMC Neurosci. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):40
pubmed: 29996777
Int J Rehabil Res. 2013 Mar;36(1):56-67
pubmed: 22960881
Brain. 1965 Jun;88(2):221-36
pubmed: 5828904
Neurosurgery. 1997 Dec;41(6):1431-6; discussion 1436-7
pubmed: 9402599
J Neurosurg. 2013 Feb;118(2):243-9
pubmed: 23121432
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1992;58(1-4):153-61
pubmed: 1439333
J Neurosurg. 2005 Dec;103(6):1010-7
pubmed: 16381187
Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Feb;11(1):17-29
pubmed: 26781482
Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6 Suppl):93-8; discussion 98-9
pubmed: 19935007
Brain Lang. 2010 Nov;115(2):101-12
pubmed: 20452661
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117(6):1039-52
pubmed: 23039150
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Jul;159(7):1187-1195
pubmed: 28456870
Neuropsychologia. 1994 Jul;32(7):805-17
pubmed: 7936164
J Vis. 2014 Aug 07;14(9):
pubmed: 25104830
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 04;6:110
pubmed: 22586384
Neuroreport. 2003 Dec 2;14(17):2239-43
pubmed: 14625455
Neurosurgery. 2018 Oct 1;83(4):768-782
pubmed: 29211865
J Digit Imaging. 2004 Sep;17(3):205-16
pubmed: 15534753
Neurol Sci. 2013 Sep;34(9):1551-7
pubmed: 23266868
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 3;33(14):6225-9
pubmed: 23554503
Neurosurgery. 2014 Dec;10 Suppl 4:542-54; discussion 554
pubmed: 25072115
Brain Stimul. 2017 Jan - Feb;10(1):171
pubmed: 27769831
Neurophysiol Clin. 2007 Dec;37(6):373-82
pubmed: 18083492
Assessment. 2003 Mar;10(1):66-70
pubmed: 12675385
J Neurotrauma. 2011 Dec;28(12):2493-501
pubmed: 21787168
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5585
pubmed: 28717226
Semin Neurol. 2012 Sep;32(4):466-75
pubmed: 23361489
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e378-e390
pubmed: 31029822
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 May;22(5):824-36
pubmed: 19400683
J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 20;33(12):5411-21
pubmed: 23516306
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Sep 18;14(10):1245-6
pubmed: 21926985
J Neurooncol. 2016 Nov;130(2):243-252
pubmed: 27317446
Brain Commun. 2020 Sep 29;2(2):fcaa158
pubmed: 33543136
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 May;168:127-139
pubmed: 29549813
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 20;7(38):61945-61954
pubmed: 27566556
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Sep;136:25-8
pubmed: 26056808
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Aug;28(6):1023-9
pubmed: 16822740
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;60(3):124-129
pubmed: 26874577
J Neurosurg. 2015 Feb;122(2):250-61
pubmed: 25423277
Front Neurosci. 2016 Dec 02;10:552
pubmed: 27994536
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11(3):223-9
pubmed: 14588926
Neurosurgery. 2012 May;70(5):1081-93; discussion 1093-4
pubmed: 22067417
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Feb;37(2):225-31
pubmed: 10080380
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2017;124:263-270
pubmed: 28120082
Cortex. 2008 Sep;44(8):983-95
pubmed: 18603235
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:219-36
pubmed: 24945663
Brain Res Rev. 2010 Mar;62(2):233-44
pubmed: 20026191
World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:425-433
pubmed: 28109861
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Nov 7;583:136-41
pubmed: 25224631
Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2475-81
pubmed: 20455066
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:68-76
pubmed: 25062545
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Jan;24(1):1-10
pubmed: 15593268
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014 Apr;16(4):284
pubmed: 24595756
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Apr;35(4):1334-50
pubmed: 23417885
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jun 14;:1-12
pubmed: 31200378
J Neurooncol. 2015 Oct;125(1):143-8
pubmed: 26272599
Cancer. 1994 Sep 15;74(6):1784-91
pubmed: 8082081
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Jul 29;354(1387):1229-38
pubmed: 10466148
BMC Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;16:5
pubmed: 25880838