Assessment of the Usefulness of Image Reconstruction in the Oblique and Double-oblique Sagittal Planes for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament.

MRI dog imaging stifle joint

Journal

Journal of veterinary research
ISSN: 2450-7393
Titre abrégé: J Vet Res
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101696630

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 03 09 2020
accepted: 21 04 2021
entrez: 12 7 2021
pubmed: 13 7 2021
medline: 13 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of the study was to determine the quality and significance of the magnetic resonance image of the canine knee after reconstruction in the oblique and double-oblique sagittal plane. This reconstruction and 3D images are rarely used in common protocols due to the longer study time they require. The study aimed to demonstrate significance for such diagnostic images in specific sequences in order to stimulate consideration of their more frequent use in diagnosis of diseases of the cruciate ligament in dogs. All tests were carried out using an open magnetic resonance tomography scanner with magnetic field induction. The images obtained from the 30 canine patients examined were reconstructed and evaluated by independent appraisers. Statistical analysis was performed. The study showed that MRI of the stifle joint using 3D sequences provides higher quality images of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. The results of the statistical analysis showed that multi-faceted reconstruction allows the secondary determination of the oblique imaging planes and obtains images of adequate quality. It can be concluded that multi-faceted reconstruction facilitates the secondary determination of oblique imaging planes. This reconstruction additionally makes images available of better quality compared to the 2D sequence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34250306
doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2021-0024
pii: jvetres-2021-0024
pmc: PMC8256465
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

209-216

Informations de copyright

© 2021 A. Przeworski et al. published by Sciendo.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest Conflict of Interests Statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Références

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;251(1):71-79
pubmed: 28621599
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2016 Nov;57(6):601-610
pubmed: 27629105
Acta Radiol. 2015 Mar;56(3):312-21
pubmed: 24589443
Vet Surg. 2011 Jun;40(4):395-401
pubmed: 21418258
BMC Vet Res. 2013 Feb 28;9:40
pubmed: 23448526
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2018 Jul;31(4):261-272
pubmed: 29859514
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2014 Jul-Aug;55(4):407-13
pubmed: 24450293
Vet J. 2016 Mar;209:150-5
pubmed: 26831152
Clin Radiol. 2012 Dec;67(12):e58-63
pubmed: 22974569
Anat Histol Embryol. 2015 Dec;44(6):468-74
pubmed: 25376635
Eur Radiol. 2009 May;19(5):1263-72
pubmed: 19137309
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2014;27(1):1-7
pubmed: 24226972
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Sep;14(3):203-6
pubmed: 11536395
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Nov;125(9):622-7
pubmed: 15690166
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007 Mar-Apr;48(2):95-100
pubmed: 17385363
Eur Radiol. 1997;7(7):1020-4
pubmed: 9265666
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Feb;42(2):209-17
pubmed: 22349646
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008 Sep-Oct;49(5):425-31
pubmed: 18833948
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81(9):2358-65
pubmed: 21974974
Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Dec;40(12):1587-94
pubmed: 21643885
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):W199-206
pubmed: 25055294
Clin Radiol. 2009 Mar;64(3):291-7
pubmed: 19185659
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):794-8
pubmed: 17729337
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2000 May-Jun;41(3):200-13
pubmed: 10850868
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):W308-W316
pubmed: 28858544
Radiology. 2009 Aug;252(2):486-95
pubmed: 19703886
Vet Surg. 2008 Feb;37(2):166-77
pubmed: 18251811
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2014 Jul-Aug;55(4):414-9
pubmed: 24438513
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2012 Nov-Dec;53(6):628-35
pubmed: 22897385
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2011 Jul-Aug;52(4):428-35
pubmed: 21470338
Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):526-35
pubmed: 18227545
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006 Oct-Nov;47(6):515-22
pubmed: 17153058
Acta Radiol. 2016 Nov;57(11):1372-1379
pubmed: 25585852
Invest Radiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):585-97
pubmed: 19668001
Acad Radiol. 2008 Jul;15(7):928-33
pubmed: 18572130
Acta Radiol. 2007 Oct;48(8):869-74
pubmed: 17924218
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Nov;30(6):391-397
pubmed: 29202501
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Feb;198(2):W173-80
pubmed: 22268208
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2007 Jul-Aug;48(4):312-7
pubmed: 17691628
Vet J. 2007 Sep;174(2):351-61
pubmed: 17097320
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178086
pubmed: 28575001
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2018 Jan;59(1):64-78
pubmed: 29094513
Radiol Oncol. 2013 Mar;47(1):19-25
pubmed: 23450118
Br J Radiol. 2015 Aug;88(1052):20150189
pubmed: 26067920
Radiology. 1990 Apr;175(1):276-7
pubmed: 2315495

Auteurs

Adam Przeworski (A)

Veterinary Clinic Tworkowski Przeworscy, 10-685 Olsztyn, Poland.

Zbigniew Adamiak (Z)

Small Animal Clinic, 15-306 Białystok, Poland.

Michał Nowicki (M)

Vet4Pet Veterinary Clinic, 04-052 Warsaw, Poland.

Marta Mieszkowska (M)

Department of Surgery and Roentgenology with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.

Angelika Tobolska (A)

Department of Surgery and Roentgenology with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.

Joanna Głodek (J)

Department of Surgery and Roentgenology with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.

Classifications MeSH