Factors affecting guardians' decision making on clinic-based purchase of children's spectacles in Nigeria.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
19
04
2021
accepted:
29
06
2021
entrez:
12
7
2021
pubmed:
13
7
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aims to understand the key factors influencing guardians' decisions when purchasing spectacles for their children in semi-urban and urban areas of Cross River State, Nigeria, where a spectacle cross-subsidisation scheme will be implemented. This cross-sectional study was conducted among all consecutive guardians visiting the Calabar (urban), Ugep, Ikom and Ogoja (semi-urban) public eye clinics in Cross River State, southern Nigeria, from August 1 to October 31 2019, and whose children had significant refractive errors (myopia ≤-0.50D, hyperopia ≥1.50D, astigmatism >0.75D) and received spectacles. Guardians were interviewed using a questionnaire which included i) close-ended questions on reasons guardians choose to purchase spectacles for their children in eye clinics, ii) guardians' perceptions of the quality and design of children's current spectacle, iii) factors most heavily influencing their choice of spectacles for children, and iv) open-ended questions to seek guardians' suggestions on how to improve the current spectacle range. All 137 eligible guardians (67.2% women [n = 92]) who visited the selected eye clinics participated in the study (response rate = 100%), with 109 (79.6%) from semi-urban and 28 (20.4%) attending urban clinics. Guardians from both urban and semi-urban clinics prioritised frame design, quality, and material as the main factors affecting their decision when purchasing spectacles for their children. Female guardians and those with higher incomes were both 1.5 times more likely to emphasise frame quality when describing selection criteria for purchasing spectacles for their children than male guardians (p = 0.01) or guardians earning less (p = 0.03). Design, material, and frame quality are key factors influencing guardians when purchasing spectacles for their children in these setting and female guardians or those with higher income prioritise frame quality. This study could guide the planning and implementation of a novel cross-subsidisation scheme in Cross River State.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
This study aims to understand the key factors influencing guardians' decisions when purchasing spectacles for their children in semi-urban and urban areas of Cross River State, Nigeria, where a spectacle cross-subsidisation scheme will be implemented.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was conducted among all consecutive guardians visiting the Calabar (urban), Ugep, Ikom and Ogoja (semi-urban) public eye clinics in Cross River State, southern Nigeria, from August 1 to October 31 2019, and whose children had significant refractive errors (myopia ≤-0.50D, hyperopia ≥1.50D, astigmatism >0.75D) and received spectacles. Guardians were interviewed using a questionnaire which included i) close-ended questions on reasons guardians choose to purchase spectacles for their children in eye clinics, ii) guardians' perceptions of the quality and design of children's current spectacle, iii) factors most heavily influencing their choice of spectacles for children, and iv) open-ended questions to seek guardians' suggestions on how to improve the current spectacle range.
RESULTS
All 137 eligible guardians (67.2% women [n = 92]) who visited the selected eye clinics participated in the study (response rate = 100%), with 109 (79.6%) from semi-urban and 28 (20.4%) attending urban clinics. Guardians from both urban and semi-urban clinics prioritised frame design, quality, and material as the main factors affecting their decision when purchasing spectacles for their children. Female guardians and those with higher incomes were both 1.5 times more likely to emphasise frame quality when describing selection criteria for purchasing spectacles for their children than male guardians (p = 0.01) or guardians earning less (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION
Design, material, and frame quality are key factors influencing guardians when purchasing spectacles for their children in these setting and female guardians or those with higher income prioritise frame quality. This study could guide the planning and implementation of a novel cross-subsidisation scheme in Cross River State.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34252145
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254517
pii: PONE-D-21-12910
pmc: PMC8274875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0254517Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
VFC is a Trustee of Vision Aid Overseas, a non-governmental organisation involved in delivering refractive services in LMICs, including Africa. NC is the Director of Research for Orbis International, an organisation involved in delivering eyecare, including children’s refractive services, in Africa and other settings. The conflict of interest stated in the manuscript does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. We have included this in both the manuscript and covering letter.
Références
Community Eye Health. 2000;13(33):9-10
pubmed: 17491946
Niger J Clin Pract. 2011 Oct-Dec;14(4):473-6
pubmed: 22248953
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Dec;1(6):e339-49
pubmed: 25104599
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Mar;47(3):925-8
pubmed: 16505025
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 3;15(3):e0229108
pubmed: 32126114
BMJ. 2014 Sep 23;349:g5740
pubmed: 25249453
Community Eye Health. 2007 Sep;20(63):37-9
pubmed: 17971908
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;17(1):83-7
pubmed: 20543943
Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jul;101(4):560-564
pubmed: 27990681
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jan;92(1):59-69
pubmed: 25379630
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 03;9(3):e88857
pubmed: 24594799
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1019-e1027
pubmed: 30049615
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 May;94(5):582-587
pubmed: 28406857
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Mar;93(3):235-42
pubmed: 26760581
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160
pubmed: 33275949