Preferences for work arrangements: A discrete choice experiment.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 13 07 2020
accepted: 24 06 2021
entrez: 12 7 2021
pubmed: 13 7 2021
medline: 23 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study investigates individual preferences for work arrangements in a discrete choice experiment. Based on sociological and economic literature, we identified six essential job attributes-earnings, job security, training opportunities, scheduling flexibility, prestige of the company, and gender composition of the work team-and mapped these into hypothetical job offers. Out of three job offers, with different specifications in the respective job attributes, respondents had to choose the offer they considered as most attractive. In 2017, we implemented our choice experiment in two large-scale surveys conducted in two countries: Germany (N = 2,659) and the Netherlands (N = 2,678). Our analyses revealed that respondents considered all six job attributes in their decision process but had different priorities for each. Moreover, we found gendered preferences. Women preferred scheduling flexibility and a company with a good reputation, whereas men preferred jobs with high earnings and a permanent contract. Despite different national labor market regulations, different target populations, and different sampling strategies for the two surveys, job preferences for German and Dutch respondents were largely parallel.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34252148
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254483
pii: PONE-D-20-21169
pmc: PMC8274907
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0254483

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Appl Psychol. 1997 Apr;82(2):262-70
pubmed: 9109284
Q J Econ. 2018 Feb;133(1):457-507
pubmed: 30237622
Soc Indic Res. 2020;151(2):365-381
pubmed: 33029036
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15
pubmed: 27325321
Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1181-7
pubmed: 23231724
Stress Health. 2017 Aug;33(3):288-297
pubmed: 27647548
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16489-93
pubmed: 20823223

Auteurs

Peter Valet (P)

Department of Sociology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.

Carsten Sauer (C)

Department of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Jochem Tolsma (J)

Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Sociology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH