A Web-Based Social Network Tool (GENIE) for Supporting Self-management Among High Users of the Health Care System: Feasibility and Usability Study.
feasibility
health and social services
high systems users
linkages
primary care
self-management
social network
usability
volunteers
web-based tool
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jul 2021
12 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
28
10
2020
accepted:
31
05
2021
revised:
01
04
2021
entrez:
13
7
2021
pubmed:
14
7
2021
medline:
14
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Primary care providers are well positioned to foster self-management through linking patients to community-based health and social services (HSSs). This study evaluated a web-based tool-GENIE (Generating Engagement in Network Involvement)-to support the self-management of adults. GENIE empowers patients to leverage their personal social networks and increase their access to HSSs. GENIE maps patients' personal social networks, elicits preferences, and filters local HSSs from a community service directory based on patient's interests. Trained volunteers (an extension of the primary care team) conducted home visits and conducted surveys related to life and health goals in the context of the Health TAPESTRY (Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality) program, in which the GENIE tool was implemented. GENIE reports were uploaded to an electronic medical record for care planning by the team. This study aims to explore patients', volunteers', and clinicians' perceptions of the feasibility, usability, and perceived outcomes of GENIE-a tool for community-dwelling adults who are high users of the health care system. This study involved 2 primary care clinician focus groups and 1 clinician interview (n=15), 1 volunteer focus group (n=3), patient telephone interviews (n=8), field observations that captured goal-action sequences to complete GENIE, and GENIE utilization statistics. The patients were enrolled in a primary care program-Health TAPESTRY-and Ontario's Health Links Program, which coordinates care for the highest users of the health care system. NVivo 11 (QSR International) was used to support qualitative data analyses related to feasibility and perceived outcomes, and descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data. Most participants reported positive overall perceptions of GENIE. However, feasibility testing showed that participants had a partial understanding of the tool; volunteer facilitation was critical to support the implementation of GENIE; clinicians perceived their navigation ability as superior to that of GENIE supported by volunteers; and tool completion took 39 minutes, which made the home visit too long for some. Usability challenges included difficulties completing some sections of the tool related to medical terminology and unclear instructions, limitations in the quality and quantity of HSSs results, and minor technological challenges. Almost all patients identified a community program or activity of interest. Half of the patients (4/8, 50%) followed up on HSSs and added new members to their network, whereas 1 participant lost a member. Clinicians' strengthened their understanding of patients' personal social networks and needs, and patients felt less social isolation. This study demonstrated the potential of GENIE, when supported by volunteers, to expand patients' social networks and link them to relevant HSSs. Volunteers require training to implement GENIE for self-management support, which may help overcome the time limitations faced by primary care clinicians. Refining the filtering capability of GENIE to address adults' needs may improve primary care providers' confidence in using such tools.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Primary care providers are well positioned to foster self-management through linking patients to community-based health and social services (HSSs). This study evaluated a web-based tool-GENIE (Generating Engagement in Network Involvement)-to support the self-management of adults. GENIE empowers patients to leverage their personal social networks and increase their access to HSSs. GENIE maps patients' personal social networks, elicits preferences, and filters local HSSs from a community service directory based on patient's interests. Trained volunteers (an extension of the primary care team) conducted home visits and conducted surveys related to life and health goals in the context of the Health TAPESTRY (Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality) program, in which the GENIE tool was implemented. GENIE reports were uploaded to an electronic medical record for care planning by the team.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to explore patients', volunteers', and clinicians' perceptions of the feasibility, usability, and perceived outcomes of GENIE-a tool for community-dwelling adults who are high users of the health care system.
METHODS
METHODS
This study involved 2 primary care clinician focus groups and 1 clinician interview (n=15), 1 volunteer focus group (n=3), patient telephone interviews (n=8), field observations that captured goal-action sequences to complete GENIE, and GENIE utilization statistics. The patients were enrolled in a primary care program-Health TAPESTRY-and Ontario's Health Links Program, which coordinates care for the highest users of the health care system. NVivo 11 (QSR International) was used to support qualitative data analyses related to feasibility and perceived outcomes, and descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Most participants reported positive overall perceptions of GENIE. However, feasibility testing showed that participants had a partial understanding of the tool; volunteer facilitation was critical to support the implementation of GENIE; clinicians perceived their navigation ability as superior to that of GENIE supported by volunteers; and tool completion took 39 minutes, which made the home visit too long for some. Usability challenges included difficulties completing some sections of the tool related to medical terminology and unclear instructions, limitations in the quality and quantity of HSSs results, and minor technological challenges. Almost all patients identified a community program or activity of interest. Half of the patients (4/8, 50%) followed up on HSSs and added new members to their network, whereas 1 participant lost a member. Clinicians' strengthened their understanding of patients' personal social networks and needs, and patients felt less social isolation.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated the potential of GENIE, when supported by volunteers, to expand patients' social networks and link them to relevant HSSs. Volunteers require training to implement GENIE for self-management support, which may help overcome the time limitations faced by primary care clinicians. Refining the filtering capability of GENIE to address adults' needs may improve primary care providers' confidence in using such tools.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34255654
pii: v5i7e25285
doi: 10.2196/25285
pmc: PMC8315309
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e25285Informations de copyright
©Ruta Valaitis, Laura Cleghorn, Ivaylo Vassilev, Anne Rogers, Jenny Ploeg, Anita Kothari, Cathy Risdon, James Gillett, Dale Guenter, Lisa Dolovich. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 12.07.2021.
Références
CMAJ. 2019 May 6;191(18):E491-E500
pubmed: 31061074
Trials. 2020 Aug 14;21(1):714
pubmed: 32795381
Chronic Illn. 2013 Jun;9(2):145-55
pubmed: 23585634
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 19;12:284-293
pubmed: 30406006
Age Ageing. 2018 May 01;47(3):374-380
pubmed: 29370339
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 14;15(2):e35
pubmed: 23410671
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Dec 12;4:184
pubmed: 30564435
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e028718
pubmed: 31427326
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):681-690
pubmed: 32162435
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Jan;63(1):e31-e42
pubmed: 28115458
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 15;21(1):63
pubmed: 32295524
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6
pubmed: 25384822
Int J Med Inform. 2009 May;78(5):340-53
pubmed: 19046928
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e109135
pubmed: 25330169
CMAJ Open. 2017 Oct 12;5(4):E753-E759
pubmed: 29025737
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):503-513
pubmed: 29986975
J Ambul Care Manage. 2018 Oct/Dec;41(4):288-297
pubmed: 29923845
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 02;9(6):e98340
pubmed: 24887107
Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29
pubmed: 19460163
Fam Syst Health. 2010 Mar;28(1):1-18
pubmed: 20438199
Psychol Health Med. 2020 Oct 23;:1-13
pubmed: 33095059
Health Educ Behav. 2003 Apr;30(2):170-95
pubmed: 12693522
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 21;9:129
pubmed: 25331942
Exp Parasitol. 2003 Jul-Aug;104(3-4):96-103
pubmed: 14552856
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 7;7(4):e013384
pubmed: 28389486
JMIR Diabetes. 2020 Jan 6;5(1):e15744
pubmed: 31904580
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Sep;23(5):467-84
pubmed: 25494621
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0161027
pubmed: 27536988
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):116
pubmed: 28166776
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 13;9:19
pubmed: 24524253
JAMA. 2002 Nov 20;288(19):2469-75
pubmed: 12435261
Implement Sci. 2016 Apr 05;11:49
pubmed: 27044360
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59723
pubmed: 23565162
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 29;11:27
pubmed: 26926837
Healthc Pap. 2014;14(2):21-5; discussion 58-60
pubmed: 25880859
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):96
pubmed: 29422057
Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):e48-59
pubmed: 23731452
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 23;21(1):69
pubmed: 32326880
Prev Med. 2016 Oct;91:24-31
pubmed: 27471027
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Feb 26;5:48
pubmed: 29536010
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Dec;60(12):1123-33
pubmed: 25642490
Diabet Med. 2020 Feb;37(2):298-310
pubmed: 31618464
Health Expect. 2019 Apr;22(2):173-182
pubmed: 30318769
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Mar 04;12:29
pubmed: 24593668