Nomenclatural issues concerning cultured yeasts and other fungi: why it is important to avoid unneeded name changes.
Culture collection
Metabolically inactive
Nomenclatural type
Typification
Viable strains
Journal
IMA fungus
ISSN: 2210-6340
Titre abrégé: IMA Fungus
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101557546
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jul 2021
13 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
16
02
2021
accepted:
18
05
2021
entrez:
14
7
2021
pubmed:
15
7
2021
medline:
15
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The unambiguous application of fungal names is important to communicate scientific findings. Names are critical for (clinical) diagnostics, legal compliance, and regulatory controls, such as biosafety, food security, quarantine regulations, and industrial applications. Consequently, the stability of the taxonomic system and the traceability of nomenclatural changes is crucial for a broad range of users and taxonomists. The unambiguous application of names is assured by the preservation of nomenclatural history and the physical organisms representing a name. Fungi are extremely diverse in terms of ecology, lifestyle, and methods of study. Predominantly unicellular fungi known as yeasts are usually investigated as living cultures. Methods to characterize yeasts include physiological (growth) tests and experiments to induce a sexual morph; both methods require viable cultures. Thus, the preservation and availability of viable reference cultures are important, and cultures representing reference material are cited in species descriptions. Historical surveys revealed drawbacks and inconsistencies between past practices and modern requirements as stated in the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICNafp). Improper typification of yeasts is a common problem, resulting in a large number invalid yeast species names. With this opinion letter, we address the problem that culturable microorganisms, notably some fungi and algae, require specific provisions under the ICNafp. We use yeasts as a prominent example of fungi known from cultures. But viable type material is important not only for yeasts, but also for other cultivable Fungi that are characterized by particular morphological structures (a specific type of spores), growth properties, and secondary metabolites. We summarize potential proposals which, in our opinion, will improve the stability of fungal names, in particular by protecting those names for which the reference material can be traced back to the original isolate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34256869
doi: 10.1186/s43008-021-00067-x
pii: 10.1186/s43008-021-00067-x
pmc: PMC8278710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
18Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Yeast. 2016 Jul;33(7):243-60
pubmed: 27144478
IMA Fungus. 2020 Jul 10;11:14
pubmed: 32714773
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009 Apr;59(Pt 4):914-20
pubmed: 19329628
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012 Nov;102(4):653-8
pubmed: 22733059
FEMS Yeast Res. 2008 Dec;8(8):1357-63
pubmed: 19054136
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2):
pubmed: 30257904
Mikrobiologiia. 2002 Jul-Aug;71(4):526-32
pubmed: 12244724
Environ Microbiol. 2013 Oct;15(10):2631-41
pubmed: 23834245
Stud Mycol. 2015 Jun;81:149-89
pubmed: 26951631
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010 Jan;60(Pt 1):249-266
pubmed: 19700448
IMA Fungus. 2020 Oct 6;11:20
pubmed: 33062585
J Bacteriol. 1948 Mar;55(3):287-306
pubmed: 18902251
Anaerobe. 2016 Aug;40:95-9
pubmed: 27370902
FEMS Yeast Res. 2003 Jun;3(4):417-32
pubmed: 12748053
Stud Mycol. 2015 Jun;81:55-83
pubmed: 26955198
Fungal Syst Evol. 2019 Jun;3:57-134
pubmed: 32467898
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0136987
pubmed: 26375944
Extremophiles. 2014 Jul;18(4):707-21
pubmed: 24893860
Mycologia. 2013 Mar-Apr;105(2):486-95
pubmed: 23099516
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Apr;49(4):1597-9
pubmed: 15793149
IMA Fungus. 2019 Dec 27;10:21
pubmed: 32647625
FEMS Yeast Res. 2020 Sep 1;20(6):
pubmed: 32710773
Microbiol Immunol. 2009 Jan;53(1):41-4
pubmed: 19161556
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:805659
pubmed: 22629202
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014 Jul;106(1):67-84
pubmed: 24748333
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019 Jan;69(1A):S1-S111
pubmed: 26596770
Mycologia. 2018 Jan-Feb;110(1):179-191
pubmed: 29864002
IMA Fungus. 2010 Dec;1(2):109-16
pubmed: 22679569
FEMS Yeast Res. 2008 Sep;8(6):939-54
pubmed: 18671746
Yeast. 2020 Mar;37(3):251-252
pubmed: 32147858
MycoKeys. 2019 Feb 27;(47):75-95
pubmed: 30853836
Stud Mycol. 2020 Jan 28;96:17-140
pubmed: 32206137
Stud Mycol. 2015 Jun;81:85-147
pubmed: 26955199
IMA Fungus. 2021 May 3;12(1):11
pubmed: 33934723
Science. 2018 Jun 29;360(6396):1405-1406
pubmed: 29954970
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2011 Jan;99(1):13-23
pubmed: 20838888
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001;39:103-33
pubmed: 11701861
Cell. 2018 Nov 29;175(6):1533-1545.e20
pubmed: 30415838
FEMS Yeast Res. 2007 Dec;7(8):1399-408
pubmed: 17825066
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;59(3):
pubmed: 33268539