[All in the mix? Blended psychotherapy as an example of digitalization in psychotherapy].

Die Mischung macht’s eben? Blended-Psychotherapie als Ansatz der Digitalisierung in der Psychotherapie.
Combined modality therapy Face to face psychotherapy Internet-based intervention Mental health eHealth

Journal

Psychotherapeut
ISSN: 0935-6185
Titre abrégé: Psychotherapeut (Berl)
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9423832

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
accepted: 08 06 2021
pubmed: 15 7 2021
medline: 15 7 2021
entrez: 14 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Over the last decades various approaches to digitalization of psychotherapy (PT) have been developed. The concept of blended PT, the combination of face to face and online interventions is one such example. While research interest on blended PT has greatly increased in the past years, the implementation of blended PT has lagged behind in German speaking countries. Also, due to the global pandemic caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), blended PT and other online approaches seem to be more relevant than ever before. The aim is to give an overview on the various forms of blended PT. Furthermore, the efficacy, the perspectives of patients and therapists as well as the topic of implementation are discussed. Narrative review of the literature on the topic of blended PT. Important considerations and findings are classified and described based on a comprehensive search. Blended psychotherapy is a concept in need of definition. By taking inspiration from blended learning concepts, we propose that a definition of blended psychotherapy should consider different levels of blends and may also consider the transforming effect on face to face psychotherapy. In transforming blends face to face PT is fundamentally changed. For some forms of blended PT the effectiveness has already been confirmed but for others there is an urgent need for research. Compared to face to face PT and purely online therapy, blended psychotherapy could provide several advantages. The interest in blended PT is increasing among patients and therapists. To be able to successfully provide evidence-based blended PT, close cooperation between science, institutions, therapists and relevant stakeholders is needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Over the last decades various approaches to digitalization of psychotherapy (PT) have been developed. The concept of blended PT, the combination of face to face and online interventions is one such example. While research interest on blended PT has greatly increased in the past years, the implementation of blended PT has lagged behind in German speaking countries. Also, due to the global pandemic caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), blended PT and other online approaches seem to be more relevant than ever before.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim is to give an overview on the various forms of blended PT. Furthermore, the efficacy, the perspectives of patients and therapists as well as the topic of implementation are discussed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
Narrative review of the literature on the topic of blended PT. Important considerations and findings are classified and described based on a comprehensive search.
RESULTS RESULTS
Blended psychotherapy is a concept in need of definition. By taking inspiration from blended learning concepts, we propose that a definition of blended psychotherapy should consider different levels of blends and may also consider the transforming effect on face to face psychotherapy. In transforming blends face to face PT is fundamentally changed. For some forms of blended PT the effectiveness has already been confirmed but for others there is an urgent need for research. Compared to face to face PT and purely online therapy, blended psychotherapy could provide several advantages.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The interest in blended PT is increasing among patients and therapists. To be able to successfully provide evidence-based blended PT, close cooperation between science, institutions, therapists and relevant stakeholders is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34257478
doi: 10.1007/s00278-021-00524-3
pii: 524
pmc: PMC8268619
doi:

Types de publication

English Abstract Journal Article Review

Langues

ger

Pagination

447-454

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Auteurs

Laura Luisa Bielinski (LL)

Abteilung Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Institut für Psychologie, Universität Bern, Fabrikstr. 8, 3012 Bern, Schweiz.

Leonie Trimpop (L)

Lehrstuhl für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland.

Thomas Berger (T)

Abteilung Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Institut für Psychologie, Universität Bern, Fabrikstr. 8, 3012 Bern, Schweiz.

Classifications MeSH