Impact of prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors on dacarbazine efficacy in metastatic melanoma.


Journal

British journal of cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Titre abrégé: Br J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370635

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
received: 14 03 2021
accepted: 01 07 2021
revised: 07 06 2021
pubmed: 16 7 2021
medline: 18 12 2021
entrez: 15 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite its low efficacy, chemotherapy with dacarbazine remains an option in metastatic melanoma patients after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± targeted therapy. Some observations suggested an increased efficacy of chemotherapy in melanoma or lung cancer patients previously treated with ICI; we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dacarbazine in a controlled-group study of patients pre-treated or not with ICI. We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive patients treated with dacarbazine for advanced cutaneous melanoma without brain metastasis, in our skin cancer centre between June 2006 and September 2019. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety of dacarbazine. Among 72 patients, 17 (23.6%) received dacarbazine after ICI and 55 (76.3%) without prior ICI. Despite less favourable prognostic factors in patients ICI-pre-treated, median PFS was 4.27 months (range 0.89-43.69) in this group versus 2.04 months (range 1.25-39.25) P = 0.03 in non-ICI-pre-treated patients; ORR were 35.3% and 12.7%, respectively. The median OS and the occurrence of adverse events were similar in both groups. Dacarbazine seems to offer a short-lived benefit in patients with progressive advanced disease despite ICI (±targeted therapy), and could be an alternative before considering best supportive care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Despite its low efficacy, chemotherapy with dacarbazine remains an option in metastatic melanoma patients after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± targeted therapy. Some observations suggested an increased efficacy of chemotherapy in melanoma or lung cancer patients previously treated with ICI; we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dacarbazine in a controlled-group study of patients pre-treated or not with ICI.
METHODS
We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive patients treated with dacarbazine for advanced cutaneous melanoma without brain metastasis, in our skin cancer centre between June 2006 and September 2019. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety of dacarbazine.
RESULTS
Among 72 patients, 17 (23.6%) received dacarbazine after ICI and 55 (76.3%) without prior ICI. Despite less favourable prognostic factors in patients ICI-pre-treated, median PFS was 4.27 months (range 0.89-43.69) in this group versus 2.04 months (range 1.25-39.25) P = 0.03 in non-ICI-pre-treated patients; ORR were 35.3% and 12.7%, respectively. The median OS and the occurrence of adverse events were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION
Dacarbazine seems to offer a short-lived benefit in patients with progressive advanced disease despite ICI (±targeted therapy), and could be an alternative before considering best supportive care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34262147
doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01486-8
pii: 10.1038/s41416-021-01486-8
pmc: PMC8476529
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating 0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 0
Dacarbazine 7GR28W0FJI

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

948-954

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Ugurel S, Röhmel J, Ascierto PA, Flaherty KT, Grob JJ, Hauschild A, et al. Survival of patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: the impact of novel therapies-update 2017. Eur J Cancer. 2017;83:247–57.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.028
Robert C, Grob JJ, Stroyakovskiy D, Karaszewska B, Hauschild A, Levchenko E, et al. Five-year outcomes with dabrafenib plus trametinib in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:626–36.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904059
Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Gogas HJ, Flaherty KT, Arance A, Mandala M, et al. Update on tolerability and overall survival in COLUMBUS: landmark analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib vs vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2020;126:33–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.016
Ribas A, Daud A, Pavlick AC, Gonzalez R, Lewis KD, Hamid O, et al. Extended 5-year follow-up results of a phase Ib study (BRIM7) of vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:46–53.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-4180
Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Hodi FS, Hwu WJ, Kefford R, et al. Five-year survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:582–8.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz011
Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob J-J, Rutkowski P, Lao CD, et al. Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1535–46.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910836
Maio M, Grob J-J, Aamdal S, Bondarenko I, Robert C, Thomas L, et al. Five-year survival rates for treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab plus dacarbazine in a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1191–6.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6018
Kreft S, Gesierich A, Eigentler T, Franklin C, Valpione S, Ugurel S, et al. Efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy after radiologic progression on targeted therapy in stage IV melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2019;116:207–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.015
Schreuer MS, Chevolet IL, Jansen YJ, Seremet TC, Wilgenhof S, Liénard D, et al. Objective responses can be obtained by CTLA-4 inhibition in metastatic melanoma after BRAF inhibitor failure. Melanoma Res. 2015;25:68–74.
doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000131
Seth R, Messersmith H, Kaur V, Kirkwood JM, Kudchadkar R, McQuade JL, et al. Systemic therapy for melanoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:3947–70.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00198
Robert C, Ribas A, Schachter J, Arance A, Grob J-J, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1239–51.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30388-2
Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, O’Day S, Weber J, Garbe C, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2517–26.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104621
Park SE, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Ahn M-J, Park K, Sun J-M. Increased response rates to salvage chemotherapy administered after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:106–11.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.10.011
Weichenthal M, Ugurel S, Leiter UM, Satzger I, Kähler KC, Welzel J, et al. Salvage therapy after failure from anti-PD-1 single agent treatment: a Study by the German ADOReg melanoma registry. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:9505–9505.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.9505
Saint-Jean M, Fronteau C, Peuvrel L, Khammari A, Varey E, Quéreux G, et al. Chemotherapy efficacy after first-line immunotherapy in 18 advanced melanoma patients. Medicine. 2020;99:e21329.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021329
Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Melanoma staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition and Beyond. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2105–10.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6513-7
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
Hodi FS, Hwu W-J, Kefford R, Weber JS, Daud A, Hamid O, et al. Evaluation of immune-related response criteria and RECIST v1.1 in patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1510–7.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0391
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–4.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Goldinger SM, Lo S, Hassel JC, Forschner A, McKean MA, Zimmer L, et al. The utility of chemotherapy after immunotherapy failure in metastatic melanoma: a multicenter case series. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:e21588–e21588.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e21588
Hadash-Bengad R, Hajaj E, Klein S, Merims S, Frank S, Eisenberg G, et al. Immunotherapy potentiates the effect of chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma—a retrospective study. Front Oncol. 2020;10:70.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00070
Hauschild A, Grob J-J, Demidov LV, Jouary T, Gutzmer R, Millward M, et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:358–65.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60868-X
Suissa S. Immortal time bias in observational studies of drug effects. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16:241–9.
doi: 10.1002/pds.1357
Gaudy-Marqueste C, Archier E, Grob A, Durieux O, Loundou A, Richard M-A, et al. Initial metastatic kinetics is the best prognostic indicator in stage IV metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:1120–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.015
Roger A, Finet A, Boru B, Beauchet A, Mazeron J-J, Otzmeguine Y, et al. Efficacy of combined hypo-fractionated radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 monotherapy in difficult-to-treat advanced melanoma patients. OncoImmunology. 2018;7:e1442166.
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1442166
Funck-Brentano E, Baghad B, Fort M, Aouidad I, Roger A, Beauchet A, et al. Efficacy of late concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy in advanced melanoma patients failing anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:1707–14.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32934
Tesniere A, Panaretakis T, Kepp O, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Zitvogel L, et al. Molecular characteristics of immunogenic cancer cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:3–12.
doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402269
Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Zitvogel L. Immunogenic cell death in cancer therapy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:51–72.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-100008
Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–92.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005
Kim JY, Lee KH, Kang J, Borcoman E, Saada-Bouzid E, Kronbichler A, et al. Hyperprogressive disease during anti-PD-1 (PDCD1) / PD-L1 (CD274) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:1699.
doi: 10.3390/cancers11111699
Powles T, Gschwend JE, Loriot Y, Bellmunt J, Geczi L, Vulsteke C, et al. Phase 3 KEYNOTE-361 trial: pembrolizumab (pembro) with or without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:TPS4590–TPS4590.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.TPS4590
Galsky MD, Necchi A, Sridhar SS, Ogawa O, Ruscica D, Angra N, et al. A phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter, global study of first-line (1L) durvalumab in combination with standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy and durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab and soc chemotherapy versus soc chemotherapy alone in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:TPS499–TPS499.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.TPS499
Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394:1915–28.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32591-7
Kato S, Goodman A, Walavalkar V, Barkauskas DA, Sharabi A, Kurzrock R. Hyperprogressors after immunotherapy: analysis of genomic alterations associated with accelerated growth rate. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4242–50.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3133
Di Giacomo AM, Ascierto PA, Pilla L, Santinami M, Ferrucci PF, Giannarelli D, et al. Ipilimumab and fotemustine in patients with advanced melanoma (NIBIT-M1): an open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:879–86.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70324-8
Vera Aguilera J, Paludo J, McWilliams RR, Zhang H, Li Y, Kumar AB, et al. Chemo-immunotherapy combination after PD-1 inhibitor failure improves clinical outcomes in metastatic melanoma patients. Melanoma Res. 2020;30:364–75.
doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000669
Crosby T, Fish R, Coles B, Mason M. Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;CD001215.

Auteurs

Sarah Bouchereau (S)

Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Louise Chaplain (L)

Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Research unit EA4340 'Biomarkers and clinical trials in cancerology and onco-hematology', Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Magali Fort (M)

Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Alain Beauchet (A)

Department of Public Health, GHU Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Thomas Sidibé (T)

Department of Pharmacy, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Marie Chapalain (M)

Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Leire Gonzalez-Lara (L)

Research unit EA4340 'Biomarkers and clinical trials in cancerology and onco-hematology', Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Christine Longvert (C)

Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Research unit EA4340 'Biomarkers and clinical trials in cancerology and onco-hematology', Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Astrid Blom (A)

Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Research unit EA4340 'Biomarkers and clinical trials in cancerology and onco-hematology', Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Philippe Saiag (P)

Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Research unit EA4340 'Biomarkers and clinical trials in cancerology and onco-hematology', Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Elisa Funck-Brentano (E)

Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. elisa.funck-brentano@aphp.fr.
Research unit EA4340 'Biomarkers and clinical trials in cancerology and onco-hematology', Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University, Paris-Saclay University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. elisa.funck-brentano@aphp.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH