Comprehensive review of surgical approaches to the elbow.

Anterior approach Elbow approaches Kaplan approach Kocher approach Olecranon osteotomy approach Triceps on and triceps off approaches

Journal

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 16 05 2021
revised: 03 06 2021
accepted: 19 06 2021
entrez: 15 7 2021
pubmed: 16 7 2021
medline: 16 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The choice of the most suitable surgical approach to the elbow forms the foundation of any successful elbow surgery. The surgical approach is based on the injury or pathology to be addressed and therefore specific anatomical details need to be considered. The surgeon must be comfortable with the bony, ligamentous and neurovascular anatomy of the elbow to consider and execute the best approach for each problem. This is an imperative to avoid iatrogenic injury. This article provides a detailed analysis, valuable technical tips, advantages and disadvantages of the most common approaches to the elbow. The lateral approaches include the Kocher, Kaplan and Extensor Digitorum Communis (EDC) Split approaches, the medial approaches include the Hotchkiss, Flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) splitting approach, the Taylor and Scham approach. The anterior approach includes the anterior neurovascular interval approach and the posterior approaches include the Olecranon osteotomy, triceps sparing, triceps reflecting approach and finally the Boyd interval approach. The text and illustrations will provide a structured overview for the practicing surgeon.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34262848
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101482
pii: S0976-5662(21)00350-7
pmc: PMC8254122
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101482

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Références

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 5;96(5):387-93
pubmed: 24599200
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Nov;38(11):2219-2226.e3
pubmed: 24206987
Acta Orthop Scand. 1972;43(6):479-90
pubmed: 4651928
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Dec;27(12):730-4
pubmed: 23412510
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2014 Dec;18(4):189-93
pubmed: 25289725
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2016 Mar;20(1):37-41
pubmed: 26709569
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Sep;77(5):696-9
pubmed: 7559692
Shoulder Elbow. 2017 Apr;9(2):105-111
pubmed: 28405222
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;10(4):380-2
pubmed: 11517370
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Apr;20(4):282-5
pubmed: 16721245
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2020;79(2):387-394
pubmed: 31448401
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Aug;21(8):1013-7
pubmed: 22071412
J Trauma. 1969 Jul;9(7):594-602
pubmed: 5793927
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Sep;34(7):1252-5
pubmed: 19700073
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 May;42(5):344-350
pubmed: 28359639

Auteurs

Saurabh Aggarwal (S)

Princess Royal University Hospital, Kings College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Farnborough Common, Orpington, BR6 8ND, UK.

Kiran Paknikar (K)

Princess Royal University Hospital, Kings College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Farnborough Common, Orpington, BR6 8ND, UK.

Joydeep Sinha (J)

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, Brixton, London, SE5 9RS, UK.

Jonathan Compson (J)

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, Brixton, London, SE5 9RS, UK.

Ines Reichert (I)

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, Brixton, London, SE5 9RS, UK.

Classifications MeSH