Does your team know how to respond safely to an operating room fire? Outcomes of a virtual reality, AI-enhanced simulation training.
Artificial intelligence
Education
Operating room fires
Patient safety
Simulation
Virtual reality
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
received:
17
01
2021
accepted:
06
06
2021
pubmed:
16
7
2021
medline:
15
4
2022
entrez:
15
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Operating room (OR) fires are rare but devastating events requiring immediate and effective response. Virtual Reality (VR) simulation training can provide a safe environment for practice of skills in such highly stressful situation. This study assessed interprofessional participants' ability to respond to VR-simulated OR fire scenarios, attitudes, numbers of attempt of the VR simulation do participants need to successfully respond to OR fires and does prior experience, confidence level, or professional role predict the number of attempts needed to demonstrate safety and pass the simulation. 180 surgical team members volunteered to participate in this study at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. Each participant completed five VR OR simulation trials; the final two trials incorporated AI assistance. Primary outcomes were performance scores, number of attempts needed to pass, and pre- and post-survey results describing participant confidence and experiences. Differences across professional or training role were assessed using chi-square tests and analyses of variance. Differences in pass rates over time were assessed using repeated measures logistic regression. One hundred eighty participants completed simulation testing; 170 (94.4%) completed surveys. Participants included surgeons (17.2%), anesthesiologists (10.0%), allied health professionals (41.7%), and medical trainees (31.1%). Prior to training, 45.4% of participants reported feeling moderately or very confident in their ability to respond to an OR fire. Eight participants (4.4%) responded safely on the first simulation attempt. Forty-three participants (23.9%) passed by the third attempt (VR only); an additional 97 participants (53.9%) passed within the 4-5th attempt (VR with AI assistance). Providers are unprepared to respond to OR fires. VR-based simulation training provides a practical platform for individuals to improve their knowledge and performance in the management of OR fires with a 79% pass rate in our study. A VR AI approach to teaching this essential skill is innovative, feasible, and effective.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Operating room (OR) fires are rare but devastating events requiring immediate and effective response. Virtual Reality (VR) simulation training can provide a safe environment for practice of skills in such highly stressful situation. This study assessed interprofessional participants' ability to respond to VR-simulated OR fire scenarios, attitudes, numbers of attempt of the VR simulation do participants need to successfully respond to OR fires and does prior experience, confidence level, or professional role predict the number of attempts needed to demonstrate safety and pass the simulation.
METHODS
180 surgical team members volunteered to participate in this study at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. Each participant completed five VR OR simulation trials; the final two trials incorporated AI assistance. Primary outcomes were performance scores, number of attempts needed to pass, and pre- and post-survey results describing participant confidence and experiences. Differences across professional or training role were assessed using chi-square tests and analyses of variance. Differences in pass rates over time were assessed using repeated measures logistic regression.
RESULTS
One hundred eighty participants completed simulation testing; 170 (94.4%) completed surveys. Participants included surgeons (17.2%), anesthesiologists (10.0%), allied health professionals (41.7%), and medical trainees (31.1%). Prior to training, 45.4% of participants reported feeling moderately or very confident in their ability to respond to an OR fire. Eight participants (4.4%) responded safely on the first simulation attempt. Forty-three participants (23.9%) passed by the third attempt (VR only); an additional 97 participants (53.9%) passed within the 4-5th attempt (VR with AI assistance).
CONCLUSIONS
Providers are unprepared to respond to OR fires. VR-based simulation training provides a practical platform for individuals to improve their knowledge and performance in the management of OR fires with a 79% pass rate in our study. A VR AI approach to teaching this essential skill is innovative, feasible, and effective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34264400
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08602-y
pii: 10.1007/s00464-021-08602-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3059-3067Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB005807
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : 1R01EB014305
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
Jones TS, Jones EL (2019) Operating room fires: reply. Anesthesiology 131:947. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002923
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002923
pubmed: 31403973
Mehta S, Bhananker S, Posner K, Domino K (2013) Operating room fires: a closed claims analysis. Surv Anesthesiol 57:262. https://doi.org/10.1097/SA.0b013e3182a49586
doi: 10.1097/SA.0b013e3182a49586
Authority PPS (2007) Three ‘“never complications of surgery”’ are hardly that. PA-PSRS Patient Saf Advis 4:82
Institute E (2009) New clinical guide to surgical fire prevention. Patients can catch fire–here’s how to keep them safer. Health Devices 38:314–332
FDA Preventing Surgical Fires (2020). https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/recommendations-reduce-surgical-fires-and-related-patient-injury-fda-safety-communication . Accessed 19 July 2020
Furness WBTA, Barfield W, Furness TA (1995) Virtual environments and advanced interface design. Oxford University Press, USA
doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195075557.003.0006
Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation–Resources—Fire Safety Video. In: Anesth. Analg. http://www.apsf.org/resources/fire-safety/ . Accessed 4 July 2020
Feldman L, Fuchshuber P, Jones D (2012) The SAGES manual on the fundamental use of surgical energy (FUSE). Springer, New York
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2074-3
Fuchshuber P, Schwaitzberg S, Jones D et al (2018) The SAGES fundamental use of surgical energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose. Surg Endosc 32(6):2583–2602
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5933-y
Feldman LS, Brunt LM, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Jones SB, Mischna J, Munro MG, Rozner MA, Schwaitzberg SD (2013) Rationale for the Fundamental use of surgical energyTM (FUSE) curriculum assessment: focus on safety. Surg Endosc 27:4054–4059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3059-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3059-4
pubmed: 23860606
Sankaranarayanan G, Li B, Miller A, Wakily H, Jones SB, Schwaitzberg S, Jones DB, De S, Olasky J (2016) Face validation of the virtual electrosurgery skill trainer (VEST©). Surg Endosc 30:730–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4267-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4267-x
pubmed: 26092003
Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Irias N, Albano HA, Malinow A, Jones SB, Moorman DW, Pawlowski JB, Jones DB (2008) Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: an approach to enhance the surgical team performance. Surg Endosc 22:885–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9678-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9678-x
pubmed: 18071813
Rehrig ST, Powers K, Jones DB (2008) Integrating simulation in surgery as a teaching tool and credentialing standard. J Gastrointest Surg 12:222–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0250-8
doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0250-8
pubmed: 18004630
Tsuda ST, Scott DJ, Jones DB (2012) Textbook of simulation: skills and team training. Ciné-Med Publishing, USA, p 864
McGaghie WC, Harris IB (2018) Learning theory foundations of simulation-based mastery learning. Simul Healthc 13:S15–S20. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000279
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000279
pubmed: 29373384
Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, Euhus DM, Jeyarajah DR, Thompson WM, Jones DB (2000) Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 191:272–283
doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00339-2
Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Irias N, Albano HA, Malinow A, Jones SB, Moorman DW, Pawlowski JB, Jones DB (2008) Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: an approach to enhance the surgical team performance. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 22:885–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9678-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9678-x
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ (2005) Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 27:10–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924
pubmed: 16147767
Eisenkraemer RE, Jaeger A, Stein LM (2013) A systematic review of the testing effect in learning. Paideia 23:397–406. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272356201314
doi: 10.1590/1982-43272356201314
Hauk L (2018) Virtual reality may prove useful for surgical fire education and training. AORN J 108:P4. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12406
doi: 10.1002/aorn.12406
pubmed: 30265395
Keane J, Pawlowski J (2019) Using simulation for or team training on fire safety. AORN J 109:374–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12630
doi: 10.1002/aorn.12630
pubmed: 30811573
Alaraj A, Lemole M, Finkle J, Yudkowsky R, Wallace A, Luciano C, Pp B, Rizzi S, Charbel F (2011) Virtual reality training in neurosurgery: review of current status and future applications. Surg Neurol Int 2:52. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.80117
doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.80117
pubmed: 21697968
pmcid: 3114314
Ruthenbeck GS, Reynolds KJ (2015) Virtual reality for medical training: the state-of-the-art. J Simul 9:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2014.14
doi: 10.1057/jos.2014.14
Fu Y, Cavuoto L, Qi D, Panneerselvam K, Yang G, Artikala VS, Enquobahrie A, De S, Schwaitzberg SD (2019) Validation of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator. Surg Endosc 33:2468–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6531-3
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6531-3
pubmed: 30334151
Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, Rege RV, Laycock R, Bergen PC, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2002) Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 16:406–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-8149-z
doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8149-z
Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sachdeva AK, Meakins JL, Blumgart LH (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–464. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008
pubmed: 12368674
pmcid: 1422600
Fu Y, Cavuoto L, Qi D, Panneerselvam K, Arikatla VS, Enquobahrie A, De S, Schwaitzberg SD (2019) Characterizing the learning curve of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator (Vblast-ss©). Surg Endosc 33:S5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06703-3
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06703-3
Hashimoto DA, Sirimanna P, Gomez ED, Beyer-Berjot L, Ericsson KA, Williams NN, Darzi A, Aggarwal R (2015) Deliberate practice enhances quality of laparoscopic surgical performance in a randomized controlled trial: from arrested development to expert performance. Surg Endosc 29:3154–3162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4042-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4042-4
pubmed: 25539697
Qi D, Ryason A, Milef N, Alfred S, Abu-Nuwar MR, Kappus M, De S, Jones DB (2020) Virtual reality operating room with AI guidance: design and validation of a fire scenario. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07447-1
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07447-1
pubmed: 33237467
pmcid: 7431365
Allen BF, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg SD, Suvranu D (2014) Survey-based analysis of fundamental tasks for effective use of electrosurgical instruments. Surg Endosc 28:1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3301-0
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3301-0
pubmed: 24253563
Dorozhkin D, De S, Olasky J, Jones DB, Molina M, Henriques S, Schwaitzberg SD, Jones SB, Cao CGL, Wang J, Flinn J (2017) OR fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity. Surg Endosc 31:3527–3533
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5379-7
Mahmood T, Darzi A (2004) The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 18:1224–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4
Vaughan N, Gabrys B, Dubey VN (2016) An overview of self-adaptive technologies within virtual reality training. Comput Sci Rev 22:65–87
doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2016.09.001
Heuvelink A, van den Bosch K, Doesburg WA van, Harbers M (2009) Intelligent agent supported training in virtual simulations. Proc NATO HFM-169 Work Hum Dimens Embed Virtual Simulation NATO Hum Factors Med Panel nd
Arikatla VS, Milef N, Girault A, Enquobahrie A, Halic T, De S (2018) Interactive Medical Simulation Toolkit (iMSTK)
HTC (2018) Vive VR System. In: Htc. https://www.vive.com/us/product/vive-virtual-reality-system/ . Accessed 12 July 2020
Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD, Forrester JE (2000) Statistical analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE): an orientation. Am J Epidemiol 157(4):364–375
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf215
Rossler KL, Sankaranarayanan G, Duvall A (2019) Acquisition of fire safety knowledge and skills with virtual reality simulation. Nurse Educ 44:88–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000551
doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000551
pubmed: 29847356
pmcid: 6252293
Sankaranarayanan G, Wooley L, Hogg D, Dorozhkin D, Olasky J, Chauhan S, Fleshman JW, De S, Scott D, Jones DB (2018) Immersive virtual reality-based training improves response in a simulated operating room fire scenario. Surg Endosc 32:3439–3449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6063-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6063-x
pubmed: 29372313