Systematic review and meta-analysis of noninstitutional psychosocial interventions to prevent juvenile criminal recidivism.


Journal

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
ISSN: 1939-2117
Titre abrégé: J Consult Clin Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0136553

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
entrez: 15 7 2021
pubmed: 16 7 2021
medline: 23 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the effectiveness of noninstitutional psychosocial interventions in preventing recidivism among criminal adolescents. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials assessing the impact on recidivism among juveniles aged 12-17. The included studies had a low to medium risk of bias and were published between 2000 and 2019. Standardized mean differences or risk differences were calculated. We included 35 (20 randomized, 15 nonrandomized) studies evaluating 17 unique, noninstitutional psychosocial interventions. A meta-analysis found no significant reductions in recidivism for studied interventions compared to control conditions. Although single studies suggested some positive effects, the evidence provided by these studies was found to have very low certainty. Post hoc analyses indicated that studies including a low-intensity control condition might have stronger relative intervention effects compared to studies with medium or high-intensity control conditions. This systematic review did not find any one noninstitutional psychosocial intervention to be more effective than control treatments in reducing future criminality among juvenile offenders aged 12-17. We discuss the implications of the present findings for social work and child and adolescent psychiatry practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 34264699
pii: 2021-62983-003
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000652
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

514-527

Auteurs

Tina M Olsson (TM)

Department of Social Work, University of Gothenburg.

Niklas Långström (N)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute.

Therése Skoog (T)

Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg.

Cecilia Andrée Löfholm (C)

National Board of Health and Welfare.

Lina Leander (L)

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.

Agneta Brolund (A)

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.

Anna Ringborg (A)

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.

Pia Nykänen (P)

Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg.

Anneth Syversson (A)

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.

Knut Sundell (K)

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH