Effect of needle type on plane block spread in a cadaveric porcine model.


Journal

BMJ military health
ISSN: 2633-3775
Titre abrégé: BMJ Mil Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761581

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 06 03 2021
accepted: 27 06 2021
medline: 24 7 2023
pubmed: 17 7 2021
entrez: 16 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Plane blocks are an increasingly common type of regional anaesthesia technique in the perioperative period. Increased spread of local anaesthesia during plane blocks is thought to be related to an increased area of pain coverage. This study sought to assess differences in injectate spread comparing Tuohy needles with standard insulated stimulating block needles. 10 Yorkshire-Cross porcine cadavers were used in this study. Immediately following euthanasia, the cadavers underwent bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block injection with radiopaque contrast dye, with one side placed with a 20 g Tuohy needle, and the other side with a 20 g insulated stimulating block needle. Injectate spread was assessed using plain film X-ray and area of spread was measured to compare differences. All 10 animals underwent successful ultrasound-guided TAP block placement. In all 10 animals, the area of contrast spread was greater with the Tuohy than stimulating needle. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyse the difference between the groups. The average difference between the two sides was 33.02% (p=0.002). This is the first study to demonstrate differences in injectate spread with different needle types. This suggests enhanced spread with Tuohy needle compared with standard block needle, and may encourage its use during plane blocks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34266972
pii: bmjmilitary-2021-001827
doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-001827
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

307-309

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Scott Hughey (S)

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA scott.b.hughey.mil@mail.mil.
Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.

J Cole (J)

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.
Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.

G J Booth (GJ)

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.
Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.

R Gliniecki (R)

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.

E Stedjelarsen (E)

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.
Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH