Patient-tailored Contrast Delivery Protocols for Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: Lower Contrast Dose and Better Image Quality.


Journal

Journal of thoracic imaging
ISSN: 1536-0237
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8606160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Nov 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 17 7 2021
medline: 26 11 2021
entrez: 16 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The first objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a patient-tailored contrast delivery protocol for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTCA), in terms of diagnostic coronary attenuation and total iodine load (TIL), by adjusting the iodine delivery rate (IDR) via dilution for body weight and tube voltage (kV), as compared with a protocol with a fixed bolus of contrast in a clinical setting. The secondary objective was to assess the association between the test-bolus data and luminal attenuation in CTCA. Patients who underwent CTCA with fixed IDR contrast delivery (cohort 1) or with IDR adjusted for body weight and kV settings (70 to 120 kV) (cohort 2) were included, and compared for intravascular luminal attenuation and TIL. The association between intravascular luminal attenuation and test-bolus scan data was investigated with linear regression. In cohort 1 (176 patients), the mean luminal attenuation differed markedly between kV categories, whereas in cohort 2 (154 patients), there were no marked differences. The mean TIL reduced significantly (20.1±1.2 g in cohort 1, 17.7±3.0 g in cohort 2, P<0.001). The peak height of the test-bolus scan was independently associated with luminal attenuation in the ascending aorta, with a 0.58 HU increase per HU peak-height increase (SE=0.18, P<0.001). Clinical implementation of a patient-tailored contrast delivery protocol for CTCA, adjusted for body weight and kV, improves luminal attenuation and significantly reduces the TIL. The peak height of the test-bolus scan is associated with luminal attenuation in the ascending aorta in the CTCA scan.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34269752
doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000593
pii: 00005382-202111000-00003
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0
Iodine 9679TC07X4

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

353-359

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Références

Tan SK, Yeong CH, Aman RRAR, et al. Low tube voltage prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography: a systematic review of image quality and radiation dose. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170874.
Isogai T, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y, et al. Body weight-tailored contrast material injection protocol for 64-detector row computed tomography coronary angiography. Jpn J Radiol. 2011;29:33–38.
Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo AA, et al. Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:576–583.
Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA, et al. Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:634–638.
Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kanao S, et al. Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:272–280.
Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A, et al. Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:690–694.
Nakaura T, Awai K, Yauaga Y, et al. Contrast injection protocols for coronary computed tomography angiography using a 64-detector scanner: comparison between patient weight-adjusted- and fixed iodine-dose protocols. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:512–519.
Fei X, Du X, Yang Q, et al. 64-MDCT coronary angiography: phantom study of effects of vascular attenuation on detection of coronary stenosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:43–49.
Mihl C, Maas M, Turek J, et al. Contrast media administration in coronary computed tomography angiography—a systematic review. Rofo. 2017;189:312–325.
Kok M, Mihl C, Hendriks BMF, et al. Optimizing contrast media application in coronary CT angiography at lower tube voltage: evaluation in a circulation phantom and sixty patients. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:1068–1074.
Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S, et al. Novel contrast-injection protocol for coronary computed tomographic angiography: contrast-injection protocol customized according to the patient’s time-attenuation response. Heart Vessels. 2014;29:149–155.
Zhu X, Zhu Y, Liu W, et al. Improved image-quality consistency in coronary CT angiography using a test-bolus-based individually tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:1113–1119.
Mihl C, Kok M, Altintas S, et al. Evaluation of individually body weight adapted contrast media injection in coronary CT-angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:830–836.
Canstein C, Korporaal JG. Reduction of contrast agent dose at low kV settings. Siemens Med Solut. 2015.
Mihl C, Kok M, Wildberger JE, et al. Coronary CT angiography using low concentrated contrast media injected with high flow rates: feasible in clinical practice. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2155–2160.
Uder M, Korporaal JG, Lell MM, et al. Optimizing contrast media injection protocols in state-of-the art computed tomographic angiography. Invest Radiol. 2014;50:161–167.
Kok M, Turek J, Muehlenbruch G, et al. Computed tomography angiography with high flow rates. Invest Radiol. 2015;50:464–469.
Chaturvedi A, Chengazi H, Baran T. Identification of patients with heart failure from test bolus of computed tomography angiography in patients undergoing preoperative evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Imaging. 2020;35:309–316.
Eberhard M, Alkadhi H. Machine learning and deep neural networks: applications in patient and scan preparation, contrast medium, and radiation dose optimization. J Thorac Imaging. 2020;35(suppl 1):S17–S20.

Auteurs

Thomas P W van den Boogert (TPW)

Departments of Clinical and Experimenta Cardiology.

Ricardo R Lopes (RR)

Biomedical Engineering and Physics.

Nick H J Lobe (NHJ)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences.

Tim A Verwest (TA)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences.

Jaap Stoker (J)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

José P Henriques (JP)

Departments of Clinical and Experimenta Cardiology.

Henk A Marquering (HA)

Biomedical Engineering and Physics.
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences.

R Nils Planken (RN)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH