Effect of Oral Azithromycin vs Placebo on COVID-19 Symptoms in Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 08 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 17 7 2021
medline: 17 8 2021
entrez: 16 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Azithromycin has been hypothesized to have activity against SARS-CoV-2. To determine whether oral azithromycin in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to absence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms at day 14. Randomized clinical trial of azithromycin vs matching placebo conducted from May 2020 through March 2021. Outpatients from the US were enrolled remotely via internet-based surveys and followed up for 21 days. Eligible participants had a positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test result (nucleic acid amplification or antigen) within 7 days prior to enrollment, were aged 18 years or older, and were not hospitalized at the time of enrollment. Among 604 individuals screened, 297 were ineligible, 44 refused participation, and 263 were enrolled. Participants, investigators, and study staff were masked to treatment randomization. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to a single oral 1.2-g dose of azithromycin (n = 171) or matching placebo (n = 92). The primary outcome was absence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms at day 14. There were 23 secondary clinical end points, including all-cause hospitalization at day 21. Among 263 participants who were randomized (median age, 43 years; 174 [66%] women; 57% non-Hispanic White and 29% Latinx/Hispanic), 76% completed the trial. The trial was terminated by the data and safety monitoring committee for futility after the interim analysis. At day 14, there was no significant difference in proportion of participants who were symptom free (azithromycin: 50%; placebo: 50%; prevalence difference, 0%; 95% CI, -14% to 15%; P > .99). Of 23 prespecified secondary clinical end points, 18 showed no significant difference. By day 21, 5 participants in the azithromycin group had been hospitalized compared with 0 in the placebo group (prevalence difference, 4%; 95% CI, -1% to 9%; P = .16). Among outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, treatment with a single dose of azithromycin compared with placebo did not result in greater likelihood of being symptom free at day 14. These findings do not support the routine use of azithromycin for outpatient SARS-CoV-2 infection. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04332107.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34269813
pii: 2782166
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11517
pmc: PMC8285753
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Azithromycin 83905-01-5

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04332107']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

490-498

Auteurs

Catherine E Oldenburg (CE)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

Benjamin A Pinsky (BA)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Clinical Virology Laboratory, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California.
Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Jessica Brogdon (J)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Cindi Chen (C)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Kevin Ruder (K)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Lina Zhong (L)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Fanice Nyatigo (F)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Catherine A Cook (CA)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Armin Hinterwirth (A)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Elodie Lebas (E)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.

Travis Redd (T)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.

Travis C Porco (TC)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

Thomas M Lietman (TM)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

Benjamin F Arnold (BF)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.

Thuy Doan (T)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH