Intra-operative use of biological products-Are we aware of their derivatives?


Journal

International journal of clinical practice
ISSN: 1742-1241
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Pract
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9712381

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 08 02 2021
accepted: 06 07 2021
pubmed: 17 7 2021
medline: 22 9 2021
entrez: 16 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Global medical advances within healthcare have subsequently led to the widespread introduction of biological products such as grafts, haemostats, and sealants. Although these products have been used for many decades, this subject is frequently not discussed during the consent process and remains an area of contention. A nationwide confidential online survey was distributed to UK-based junior registrars (ST3-5), senior registrars (ST6-8), post-CCT fellows, specialist associates/staff grade doctors and consultants working in general/vascular surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, oral and maxillofacial surgery and plastic surgery. Data were collected from a total of 308 survey respondents. Biological derivatives were correctly identified in surgical products by only 25% of survey respondents, only 19% stated that they regularly consent for use of these products. Our results demonstrate that most participants in this study do not routinely consent (81%) to the intra-operative use of biological materials. An overwhelming 74% of participants agreed that further education on the intra-operative use of biological materials would be valuable. This study highlights deficiencies in knowledge that results in potential compromise of the consenting process for surgical procedures. A solution to this would be for clinicians to increase their awareness via educational platforms and to incorporate an additional statement on the consent form which addresses the potential intraoperative use of biological products and what their derivatives may be. Modernising the current consent process to reflect the development and use of surgical biological products will help to ensure improved patient satisfaction, fewer future legal implications as well as a better surgeon-patient relationship.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34270848
doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14633
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biological Products 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14633

Informations de copyright

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Jolly K, Darr A, Aslanidou A, Bowyer D, Ahmed S. The intra-operative use of biological products: a multi-centre regional patient perspective of a potential consenting conundrum. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44:831-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13367
Enoch S, Shaaban H, Dunn KW. Informed consent should be obtained from patients to use products (skin substitutes) and dressings containing biological material. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:2-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.005272
Eriksson A, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. Animal derived products may conflict with religious patients’ beliefs. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-48
Sattar SP, Ahmed MS, Majeed F, Petty F. Inert medication ingredients causing nonadherence due to religious beliefs. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:621-624. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1d324
Easterbrook C. Porcine and bovine surgical products. Arch Surg. 2008;143:366. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.4.366
Dixon JL, Smalley MG. Jehova’s witnesses: the surgical/ethical challenge. JAMA. 1981;246:2471-2472.
Sulmasy DP. The Healer’s Calling: A Spirituality for Physicians and other Health Care Professionals. New York: Paulist Press; 1997.
Silvestri GA, Knittig S, Zoller JS, Nietert PJ. Importance of faith on medical decisions regarding cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1379-1382.
The Vegan Society. Food and you survey. https://www.vegansociety.com/my-account/the-vegan/issue-3-2018/survey. Accessed April 1, 2020.

Auteurs

Navdeep Bhamra (N)

Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Karan Jolly (K)

Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Adnan Darr (A)

Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Duncan J Bowyer (DJ)

Department of Otolaryngology, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.

Shahzada K Ahmed (SK)

Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH