Acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of stakeholders implementing the novel BPaL regimen to treat extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 07 2021
Historique:
received: 26 10 2020
accepted: 30 06 2021
entrez: 17 7 2021
pubmed: 18 7 2021
medline: 6 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

BPaL, a 6 month oral regimen composed of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid for treating extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) is a potential alternative for at least 20 months of individualized treatment regimens (ITR). The ITR has low tolerability, treatment adherence, and success rates, and hence to limit patient burden, loss to follow-up and the emergence of resistance it is essential to implement new DR-TB regimens. The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of implementing BPaL in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, and Nigeria. We conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study among a cross-section of health care workers, programmatic and laboratory stakeholders between May 2018 and May 2019. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to assess perceptions on acceptability and feasibility of implementing BPaL. We determined the proportions of a recoded 3-point Likert scale (acceptable; neutral; unacceptable), as well as the overall likelihood of implementing BPaL (likely; neutral; unlikely) that participants graded per regimen, pre-defined aspect and country. We analysed the qualitative results using a deductive framework analysis. In total 188 stakeholders participated in this study: 63 from Kyrgyzstan, 51 from Indonesia, and 74 from Nigeria The majority were health care workers (110). Overall, 88% (146/166) of the stakeholders would likely implement BPaL once available. Overall acceptability for BPaL was high, especially patient friendliness was often rated as acceptable (93%, 124/133). In contrast, patient friendliness of the ITR was rated as acceptable by 45%. Stakeholders appreciated that BPaL would reduce workload and financial burden on the health care system. However, several stakeholders expressed concerns regarding BPaL safety (monitoring), long-term efficacy, and national regulatory requirements regarding introduction of the regimen. Stakeholders stressed the importance of addressing current health systems constraints as well, especially in treatment and safety monitoring systems. Acceptability and feasibility of the BPaL regimen is high among TB stakeholders in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, and Nigeria. The majority is willing to start using BPaL as the standard of care for eligible patients despite country-specific health system constraints.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
BPaL, a 6 month oral regimen composed of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid for treating extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) is a potential alternative for at least 20 months of individualized treatment regimens (ITR). The ITR has low tolerability, treatment adherence, and success rates, and hence to limit patient burden, loss to follow-up and the emergence of resistance it is essential to implement new DR-TB regimens. The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of implementing BPaL in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, and Nigeria.
METHODS
We conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study among a cross-section of health care workers, programmatic and laboratory stakeholders between May 2018 and May 2019. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to assess perceptions on acceptability and feasibility of implementing BPaL. We determined the proportions of a recoded 3-point Likert scale (acceptable; neutral; unacceptable), as well as the overall likelihood of implementing BPaL (likely; neutral; unlikely) that participants graded per regimen, pre-defined aspect and country. We analysed the qualitative results using a deductive framework analysis.
RESULTS
In total 188 stakeholders participated in this study: 63 from Kyrgyzstan, 51 from Indonesia, and 74 from Nigeria The majority were health care workers (110). Overall, 88% (146/166) of the stakeholders would likely implement BPaL once available. Overall acceptability for BPaL was high, especially patient friendliness was often rated as acceptable (93%, 124/133). In contrast, patient friendliness of the ITR was rated as acceptable by 45%. Stakeholders appreciated that BPaL would reduce workload and financial burden on the health care system. However, several stakeholders expressed concerns regarding BPaL safety (monitoring), long-term efficacy, and national regulatory requirements regarding introduction of the regimen. Stakeholders stressed the importance of addressing current health systems constraints as well, especially in treatment and safety monitoring systems.
CONCLUSIONS
Acceptability and feasibility of the BPaL regimen is high among TB stakeholders in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, and Nigeria. The majority is willing to start using BPaL as the standard of care for eligible patients despite country-specific health system constraints.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34271884
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11427-y
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-11427-y
pmc: PMC8284025
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antitubercular Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1404

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0135802
pubmed: 26301748
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):893-902
pubmed: 32130813
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Mar;25(2):104-11
pubmed: 19917651
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221688
pubmed: 31449542
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 May 2;66(10):1625-1630
pubmed: 29126225
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 21;14:81
pubmed: 24559177
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jan;7(1):
pubmed: 34992077
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e18964
pubmed: 21573227
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 28;10:135
pubmed: 26416206
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Jan 1;21(1):23-31
pubmed: 28157461
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016 Jun;30(2):509-522
pubmed: 27208770
J Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 6;216(suppl_7):S724-S732
pubmed: 29117347
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147397
pubmed: 26807933
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141
pubmed: 27756414
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004 Jun;8(6):749-59
pubmed: 15182146

Auteurs

S E J van de Berg (SEJ)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.

P T Pelzer (PT)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands. puck.pelzer@kncvtbc.org.

A J van der Land (AJ)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.

E Abdrakhmanova (E)

National TB Program Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

A Muhammad Ozi (AM)

National Tuberculosis and Leprosy control Program Nigeria, Mabushi, Nigeria.

M Arias (M)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.

S Cook-Scalise (S)

TB Alliance, New York, USA.

G Dravniece (G)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
PATH, Kyiv, Ukraine.

A Gebhard (A)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.

S Juneja (S)

TB Alliance, New York, USA.

R Handayani (R)

National TB Program Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

D Kappel (D)

TB Alliance, New York, USA.

M Kimerling (M)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.

I Koppelaar (I)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.

S Malhotra (S)

TB Alliance, New York, USA.

B Myrzaliev (B)

KNCV country office Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

B Nsa (B)

KNCV country office Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.

J Sugiharto (J)

Yayasan KNCV Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

N Engel (N)

Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

C Mulder (C)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

S van den Hof (S)

KNCV Tuberculosis foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH