Three Delays Model applied to prevention of unsafe abortion in Ghana: a qualitative study.
abortion
induced
qualitative research
Journal
BMJ sexual & reproductive health
ISSN: 2515-2009
Titre abrégé: BMJ Sex Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101715577
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
16
10
2020
accepted:
24
06
2021
pubmed:
18
7
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
17
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Unsafe abortion is an important public health problem in Ghana, making significant contributions to the morbidity and mortality of reproductive-aged women. Although mostly used in explaining mortality associated with perinatal care, recent calls for research on induced abortion in Africa suggest that the Three Delays Model could be used to enhance understanding of women's experiences and access to induced abortion care. We conducted 47 face-to-face interviews with women who had experienced unsafe abortions, with formal abortion providers (abortion providers in hospitals) and with informal and non-legal abortion providers (pharmacy workers and herb sellers). Study participants were recruited from selected hospitals, community pharmacies and markets within the Ashanti region of Ghana. We drew on phenomenology to analyse the data. The first delay (in seeking care) occurred because of women's poor knowledge of pregnancy, the influence of religion, and as a result of women underestimating the seriousness of abortion complications. Factors including cost, provider attitudes, stigma, and the proximity of pharmacies to women's homes delayed their access to safe abortion and resulted in their experience of the second delay (in reaching a healthcare facility). The third delay (in receiving appropriate care) was a result of hospitals' non-prioritisation of abortion complications and a shortage of equipment, resulting in long hospital waiting times before treatment. This study has shown the value of the Three Delays Model in illustrating women's experiences of unsafe abortions and ways of preventing the first, second and third delays in their access to care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Unsafe abortion is an important public health problem in Ghana, making significant contributions to the morbidity and mortality of reproductive-aged women. Although mostly used in explaining mortality associated with perinatal care, recent calls for research on induced abortion in Africa suggest that the Three Delays Model could be used to enhance understanding of women's experiences and access to induced abortion care.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted 47 face-to-face interviews with women who had experienced unsafe abortions, with formal abortion providers (abortion providers in hospitals) and with informal and non-legal abortion providers (pharmacy workers and herb sellers). Study participants were recruited from selected hospitals, community pharmacies and markets within the Ashanti region of Ghana. We drew on phenomenology to analyse the data.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
The first delay (in seeking care) occurred because of women's poor knowledge of pregnancy, the influence of religion, and as a result of women underestimating the seriousness of abortion complications. Factors including cost, provider attitudes, stigma, and the proximity of pharmacies to women's homes delayed their access to safe abortion and resulted in their experience of the second delay (in reaching a healthcare facility). The third delay (in receiving appropriate care) was a result of hospitals' non-prioritisation of abortion complications and a shortage of equipment, resulting in long hospital waiting times before treatment.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study has shown the value of the Three Delays Model in illustrating women's experiences of unsafe abortions and ways of preventing the first, second and third delays in their access to care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34272209
pii: bmjsrh-2020-200903
doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200903
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e75-e80Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.